Sheffielder Posted April 26, 2020 Share Posted April 26, 2020 Thank you - appreciate the reply SeNioR-, sobrenome and asigno 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobrenome Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 On 4/6/2020 at 9:14 PM, AlexWebsites said: I'm currently serving webp mages on all my IPS sites using mod_pagespeed. I would like to use the “Priorize Critical CSS” function of mod_pagespeed to avoid render blocking. Do you use this feature? Does it break IPS or make TTFB to high? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexWebsites Posted May 2, 2020 Share Posted May 2, 2020 On 4/30/2020 at 1:03 PM, sobrenome said: I would like to use the “Priorize Critical CSS” function of mod_pagespeed to avoid render blocking. Do you use this feature? Does it break IPS or make TTFB to high? No idea, had server management install it a while ago. Whatever default settings are, that’s what I’m using. Probably could tweak, but haven’t. SeNioR- and sobrenome 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobrenome Posted May 2, 2020 Share Posted May 2, 2020 16 hours ago, AlexWebsites said: No idea, had server management install it a while ago. Whatever default settings are, that’s what I’m using. Probably could tweak, but haven’t. Do you have a PageSpeed Insight test to show is CSS is render blocking or not? 😀 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Ocio Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Can you share a tutorial about this? sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asigno Posted June 25, 2020 Share Posted June 25, 2020 Safari 14 now supports .webp https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-14-beta-release-notes rodege5389, 13., SeNioR- and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everade Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 How is webp still not a thing in IPBoard? Google basically forces you into webp with optimisation recommendations. asigno, rodege5389, sobrenome and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VR6Pete Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 any update on this? 🙂 sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey_M Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 Everywhere seems to be using .webp files these days, except Facebook. It makes using images (which I have permission for) a little difficult when they're downloaded as .webp files and, I then need to convert them to usable images. sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PPlanet Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 9 minutes ago, Joey_M said: Everywhere seems to be using .webp files these days, except Facebook. It makes using images (which I have permission for) a little difficult when they're downloaded as .webp files and, I then need to convert them to usable images. I use a plugin on my browser (Firefox) to convert back to Jpeg when downloading. I know it exists for Chrome too. I serve .webp files on my site via Cloudflare. Only the cached versions from Cloudflare are .webp, while on my server they remain the original format they have. sobrenome and Joey_M 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey_M Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 7 hours ago, PPlanet said: I use a plugin on my browser (Firefox) to convert back to Jpeg when downloading. I know it exists for Chrome too. I serve .webp files on my site via Cloudflare. Only the cached versions from Cloudflare are .webp, while on my server they remain the original format they have. Very useful, I'll look into this as it can become quite a chore. 👍🏻 PPlanet and SeNioR- 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wegorz23 Posted August 6, 2021 Share Posted August 6, 2021 Still nothing? After 5 years? IPS please do sth with that. sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Explosion Posted August 6, 2021 Share Posted August 6, 2021 It was added in 4.6.x Not working? Be more specific about what is not working. And also, ensure that your hosting provides the necessary support for webp: sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wegorz23 Posted August 10, 2021 Share Posted August 10, 2021 It works only when I add it from insert existing attachment. sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Explosion Posted August 10, 2021 Share Posted August 10, 2021 Ok - but when does it NOT work. You say "it works only" but if you need assistance with something then you need to tell us what you are doing, and what you want to happen? Otherwise, it's guess-work on our part. sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wegorz23 Posted August 11, 2021 Share Posted August 11, 2021 sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asigno Posted August 11, 2021 Share Posted August 11, 2021 On 8/10/2021 at 6:09 PM, Nathan Explosion said: Ok - but when does it NOT work. You say "it works only" but if you need assistance with something then you need to tell us what you are doing, and what you want to happen? Otherwise, it's guess-work on our part. I think the general consensus of dissapointment is that WebP support in IPB is limited to file uploads. It doesn't automatically serve reprocessed WebP images to supportive browsers. Which is what would have been expected. AlexWebsites and sobrenome 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opentype Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 (edited) 6 hours ago, asigno said: I think the general consensus of dissapointment is that WebP support in IPB is limited to file uploads. It doesn't automatically serve reprocessed WebP images to supportive browsers. Which is what would have been expected. You jump from what you personally expect to “general consensus” way too easily. Edited August 12, 2021 by opentype sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kims79 Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 3 hours ago, opentype said: You jump from what you personally expect to “general consensus” way too easily. It is safe to say that this is indeed a "general consensus". The wepb is hardly used as such when sending images, users always send in pnj or jpg. We were also expecting an automatic conversion of existing images in order to reduce bandwidth consumption and loading time. At least, this is what we have been asking for for several months now. sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opentype Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 37 minutes ago, kims79 said: It is safe to say that this is indeed a "general consensus". Based on what? Because a total of two people in this topic say so? Out of the thousands of IPS clients who you have not consulted? That’s not how consensus works. Not by a long shot. But you win. I shut up. I saw a questionable statement. I questioned it. That’s what my sceptic nature demands. Not gonna debate language on a tech forum. You wouldn’t care anyway. sobrenome and Luuuk 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexWebsites Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 5 hours ago, opentype said: Based on what? I’m at fault for initially assuming as well. I don’t see the need (although nice) for uploading as much as “on the fly” conversion and serving to browsers that support. You can achieve this in other ways but would have been a nice feature enhancement for SEO. sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kims79 Posted August 16, 2021 Share Posted August 16, 2021 On 12/08/2021 at 11:39, opentype said: Sur la base de quoi ? Parce qu'un total de deux personnes dans ce sujet le disent? Sur les milliers de clients IPS que vous n'avez pas consultés ? Ce n'est pas ainsi que fonctionne le consensus. Pas de loin. Mais tu gagnes. Je me tais. J'ai vu une déclaration douteuse. Je l'ai questionné. C'est ce que ma nature sceptique exige. Je ne vais pas débattre de la langue sur un forum technique. Vous vous en ficheriez de toute façon. Has the question been asked? If we have a subscription, it is to benefit from updates, especially those that help SEO, I do not know anyone who would say no to a gain in search engines and a decrease in bandwidth consumed. Whether WEPB, PWA, etc. ... It is a regular request from the community, especially for the improvement of referencing and pagespeed scores. sobrenome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts