Jump to content



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Everade

  • Rank
  • Birthday 01/11/1989

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

5,069 profile views
  1. It wouldn't really consider it being 2 things. Since webp, webm and mp4 (and anything else you may want to add) would all need to be added at the exact same spots. Yes webm and mp4 would require seperate handling, but the "locations" you've been asking for are all at the same spot. So you would save time by implementing them both together eventualy 😉 In any case, looking forward to any of it. Cheers.
  2. Yes, absolutely. Directly linking it within the editor works just fine, just like with webp. Also uploading into the editor works just fine, that's great. But you're missing out that we can not upload it as an "image". How about webm as: - Profile picture - Bug Report "image" upload on your custom PAGES - Cover Photo - Forum Icon - Grid Card Image That's what you get: What i'm asking for is, enabling mp4, webm uploads in all IMAGE locations and simply generate fake GIFs using: Just like Twitter, Giphy, Instagram and all the other big players do. <vi
  3. Thanks for hearing me out, appreciate it. Hope next to webp ,both webm +mp4 is being considered for "image" uploads in form of faking GIFs as well! Please note that: Twitter and Co. are faking GIFs as looping MP4 or WEBP videos since quite a while. Video format compressions are simply superior in any way. And a user can't tell the difference. Here's an example of a twitter post which has been uploaded as a GIF and shows as such in the bottom left corner. And here's the actual source as a mp4: https://video.twimg.com/tweet_video/EjB_QLaXYAEvrOB.mp4
  4. Regarding WEBM and MP4: https://web.dev/replace-gifs-with-videos/ It's so much better than gif, would be amazing to have support for these.
  5. 1.) Display webp as image instead of attachment (handle them just like all other image types) 2.) Allow webp as image upload option in all areas (Profile Picture, Cover Photo, Forum Icon, Grid Card Image, Pages when posting content and anywhere else that i've missed) Repeat the steps for .WEBM (would be lovely since video compression is in most cases superior to animated images such as GIF and WEBP) Would be really great to be able to be able to upload video format types in all the mentioned areas (Profile Pictures, Cover Photo, but especialy Pages) 3.) Add
  6. Exactly, uploading webp as an image simply isn't handled as such. Back in the days with IPB3, we were able to easily define custom file support for uploads. From what i can tell, IPB4 doesn't even give you that option anymore?! webp should be clearly added at least as an option for image upload. Of course there are other implementation options like profile pictures, thumbnail compression and so on. That would be amazing of course, but we're simply lacking the very basics already. As of today, IPB simply fully ignores the most likely best lossless and lossy image type in exis
  7. Why are invisioncommunity devs so blind for webp? It's not like it requires any other extra work, since the compression of webp is already existant by nature. Simply allowing webp by default shouldn't be the biggest deal, or is it? It's already widely accepted by all major browsers, so there's no excuse on that anymore, especially not since you dropped IE support yourselfs. But still, every request and any conversation about webp have either been put down, or ignored. Could we please get an explanation why you're so anti-fast-web? I'm honestly wondering why is that.
  8. How is webp still not a thing in IPBoard? Google basically forces you into webp with optimisation recommendations.
  9. How about adding the option to, rather than use fontAwesome integration directly, instead you allow us to upload the .svg files instead. In 95% of all cases people will most likely not require more than 5 different custom icons. And we cann still download the svg files. This would help with performance and will also fix the problems with the e-mails.
  10. Thank you for this great extension! However there are some things that are bothering me. 1. Does not show live-info on registration form like the official fields That means that after hitting registration the users will be returned with an error message rather than giving live feedback 2. Error message can not be modified which always states: This value is not unique, please enter/select another value. Would be great to edit the message accordingly based on the selected unique field And adding that little red icon would also be nice to match the official errors
    Not the easiest installation or configuration process, but definitely worth it!
  11. - Frontpage View, would be great if we could add date and text to the first rows rather than just showing images. I love the design, but the lacking text makes it hard to engage people to open the article. I'm now using the category view for my users instead. - Category View has issues displaying properly on Internet Explorer with Desktop sizing. Smaller window widths (tablets/smartphone) looks fine.
  12. While the custom profile fields currently allow for a maximum length setting. It does not allow us to set a minimum length at all. Not even for the Password field... I think it would be great to add a Minimum Length option to all fields which currently support the Maximum Length. That would be: Code Email Adress Password Telephone Number Text Text Area URL I personally would require it to be used for the Text field, which allows me to set the minimum length of a username used on registration. (SSO integration) Since IPB 4.x co
  13. @Nathan Explosion I noticed a bug. The icons are included in mails, but they don't display there.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use technologies, such as cookies, to customise content and advertising, to provide social media features and to analyse traffic to the site. We also share information about your use of our site with our trusted social media, advertising and analytics partners. See more about cookies and our Privacy Policy