Marc

Are you ensuring that you are using the correct language pack in your Admin CP first of all? Also, ensure your language pack uses the correct locale, as some items are set by locale

As an update to this, there has now been a patch just released to resolve this issue. To apply the patch, please visit support in your Admin CP and select the "Optional Update" item shown

Just to let you all know, there has now been a patch just released to resolve this issue. To apply the patch, please visit support in your Admin CP and select the "Optional Update" item shown

This being the case, it sounds very much like it's a linked in issue, rather than one of your own there

Your articles look awesome btw 🙂 

I would suggest addressing these first of all, as they may well be what is causing the problem. 

There isnt a setting for this, however one of our customers has placed a suggestion on how to customise this if you wanted to look?

There is also an open suggestion for adding a setting for this. 

Do you have an example of this, so I can see what you mean here? Im not seeing any issues on my test instance here, and if what opentype mentions is the case on all posts there, its likely what is causing your issues

Limitations on the number of reactions that can be given per day can only be done at the group level. The correct way to do this would indeed be to add a secondary group which has those higher permissions, as you would with any other permission.

A -200 error would usually indicate an issue server side, rather than on the side of the software, however in your case I note you are using the cloud product. Do you have a copy of the GIF you can zip and then upload here. Note, it is important you zip it first as I need the original file preserves for my testing here

23 minutes ago, bearback said:

that's not good 🤨

Please bear in mind it can take some time for these to go through. From the point its determined to be a bug, it needs to actually be fixed, then reviewed, then applied to a version, then actually released.  These processes mean it may not have a fix for the next release. It may be the release after, and in some complex cases longer

10 minutes ago, AlexWebsites said:

Oh ok, I wasn’t aware of that. I assumed it would be fixed with the next version.

No, Sorry. When there is a bug report there is no guarentee as to which version it will appear in. It depends upon what is involved in fixing the issue, then it being fixed, reviewed, tested, then applied to a version. So it can take some time from bug report to actually being released, depending on where we are in the release cycle. 

7 hours ago, liquidfractal said:

Thank you Lucas.  But can you tell me if this will also prevent myISAM tables from being written through the installation of 3rd-party apps/plugins (I ask because the variable mentions "default" storage engine)?  And if so, might this prevent their installation or compromise their function?

tables are created using the default storage engine, so switching that will indeed have the desired effect

Also checking simple things first such as going to support in your AdminCP and ensuring you follow any suggestions in there. Items such as tables not using INNODB can affect performance for example.

6 hours ago, AlexWebsites said:

This was not fixed  

 

You still actually have a ticket in support open related to this, which is being looked at. The fix was not added to the latest release for that reason.

10 hours ago, NightOwlHacks984 said:

no renewals at all. 30 Days upon Purchase then Removal from A group.

As mentioned above, this is not something currently possible in that case unfortunately. I have moved this to the suggestions forum for you, so it can be considered in a future release

8 hours ago, asigno said:

Thank you @Marc Stridgenthat fixed it, I had only added the GTM code, but it was an older version of the globalTemplate.

Excellent 🙂 Glad we have you sorted

5 hours ago, AlexWebsites said:

So 4.6.6 is out and to my disappointment the issue remains. Was this fix not included? 

This is still showing as being worked on at present, and  your ticket on this is still active

You would need to speak to the author on this one to see if they have an updated version for you

Thank you for letting us know. I will make our developers aware of this so that it can be looked into.

12 minutes ago, Jeffrey Roberts said:

Can anyone report whether this was addressed in the latest release - 4.6.6 ?

Not as of yet. This is still ongoing

You can remove IP addresses from view, but you would not be able to stop them being logged entirely. And indeed in most cases that would be undesirable. Maybe if we can understand the reasons you would want to do this, it may help us assist further.

14 hours ago, Kjell Iver Johansen said:

I removed facebook login on my forum a week ago, and put the app in developer mode. Not a single member has complained after I did that.

I just don't like the way fb act towards other competitors in social media at the moment. 

 

Unfortunately this is indeed the case

6 hours ago, Fast Lane! said:

I'm still on Invision 4.4 and got the same message.  Something is a foot, not just a 4.6 issue....

I'll be upgrading soon but this issue has me boggled too. 

You will indeed be having the issue on 4.4, as there was a patch in 4.6 to resolve the problem. So 4.4 would have issues

4 hours ago, Fast Lane! said:

This may help folks. 

https://xenforo.com/community/threads/facebook-connected-account-login-crashing.197650/

Not sure how this would help, to be honest. 

7 hours ago, asigno said:

Thanks, I've found the problem from comparing to the IPS board, I don't get the burger menu.

I've just reset to the default IPS theme, and it's not appearing, and I can't seem to find any settings for it.

 

You would need to revert your globalTemplate there. At some point you have edited that template, and therefore its not updated. So your theme at present doesnt have the changes required to add that menu

12 hours ago, NightOwlHacks984 said:

correct but I don't see how to make purchases temporary, or add a duration period for a purchase.

Before we continue, could I ask about the "Temporary" part here? Is this on a renewal basis? For example, if they purchase that 30 days, could they then purchase another 30 once it expired?

Assuming you are referring to them not being able to renew anything after that period, then its not currently possible as mentioned. However if you are doing this in terms of trial periods that would be a different matter. It really depends on what you are trying to achieve