Jimi Wikman

Hi Brian, The custom emojis are a little funky, but it should be possible to fix with CSS :) Font-size will define the height of the font object. This is affecting the text the emoji will be connected to, but since your emojis are images, they will not be directly affected. Line-height will add or remove some padding to the fonts at the top and bottom. If the line-height is higher or lower than the height of your emoji, then they can be affected and look superscript. Vertical-align will align the image with the content, and if you set it to middle, it should align to the center of the text. There are plenty of other CSS attributes that affect this, however. For me, I had an issue where the emojis did not scale properly and became huge, so I added this small snippet to my theme CSS: .ipsEmoji img { vertical-align: sub; width: 20px; height: 20px; } Not sure if that will help you, but maybe it can be a start? If you give us a link to a page with the emojis, we can help you better.

yes you can do this, and while a bit time-consuming to do initially, it should not be a problem to maintain if you plan the main navigation accordingly. Just be aware that if the CSS for some reason does not load, it will show the full navigation. Technically, you could also have different use groups for the Forum and the Pages and that can be used to control who sees what. Not sure if that is feasible for you? If you want to have Forums and Pages as separate sites, then you will need two licenses as far as i know. Yes, I think so. You can also see if there are any mods that allow you to have two different navigations. That can still cause issues in future upgrades though, so you are kind of in the same situation there,

The behaviour is a bit weird for this, as it depends on the subforums, it seems. Top level category does not have the option to add an icon or graphics. Second level category have option to upload an image. In my forum I have the following: Atlassian -> Category Atlassian -> Category Atlassian General -> Discussion This shows the icon from Atlassian General for the Top and Secondary categories. If I do not have an icon in the subforums, then it will show the placeholder in the top and secondary categories as well. This suggests that the icons that show up in the top and secondary category forums are inherited from the first subforum that is not a category. The icon is hard-coded as far as I know. You should be able to change it using the CSS for it: .fa-ips::before { content: var(--icon, "\f1c5"); }

Hi Gary, when you create pages in Pages to hold the databases, or just act as pages, you can set the Theme for each page. You can also create page wrappers if you want, but there is just one menu, unfortunately. For future proofing, I would suggest having the two separate if the navigation can be an issue. If you tell us a little more about the two projects you are working on, perhaps we can guide you better?

Adriano has always been an outstanding app developer with some of the best apps the community has ever known.

I would disagree that doing a switch in the DOM after load is the correct way to do it. The correct way, in my opinion, is to load the correct asset on load, which should be a part of the Theme and not a general asset ;) The way it is suggested, when the correct way is denied, is to rewrite the DOM is what I think you mean in this case :) There is a reason why you have the image being shown as an asset in the image tag and not in CSS; otherwise, you would have it in the CSS connected to a class to begin with. It is strange to suggest that we upload an image and use CSS to hide the asset and then force the uploaded image in its place instead of just allowing that uploaded image to be used as the asset to begin with. It is also strange that I have to have the same image for all themes if I don't hide and add a new image using CSS overrides. Is there a reason for this that I am missing?

This seems like a strange decision not to allow thematic control of the software we pay for, but if I have to replace images every time there is an upgrade, I can live with that. Or just not upgrade of course :)

I guess there are just two ways to know: Try it, or ask the team :)

Have you tried to change the permissions for the image and the folder on the server?

You can check the path and upload a new image with the same name to the server as well.

All images gone...

Users can set that in their content preferences if you allow that.

That is too bad because the only way I can do this now is to hack it in the database to detach the page and then add a redirect script on the page itself....

I have used internal databases before to enrich other databases, like with countries or profiles. These databases are not supposed to be shown, or accessed, but only added through the database relationship field. As I must have a page and as I must set permissions to allow users to see the database and the records, how is this supposed to work? Am I missing something or is this one of those scenarios where I have to figure out how to detach a database from a page in the database for this to work?

I think you will have to wait for a while after the release because I assume there are refactorings being made to the code now during the betas and probably a few adjustments after the first release. I have not seen anything yet in the CMS that I could not reproduce from V4, but there are changes to the CSS classes now that we have a built-in dual theming for the light and dark modes. You also have some updates to the tabs and collapsible items, but they are basically the same. I suggest you set up a test environment and try things out.