Maxxius

Yes, a good suggestion I thought of in the past. How come articles can't have polls? Just extend the system to include it to pages. Shouldn't it be that hard?

Yeah I know of this plugin. But that's exactly why I made this topic. This should be doable without any plugins to rely on.

Fair point. I'll have a think.

As the title suggests, if I restrict a member from posting for 30 days that should also restrict them from reacting to posts, or at least have an option to disable.
Had a couple of members now taking their frustration out by trolling the moderators with reactions following their temporary restrictions. Work around has been to move them into different groups where they can make 0 reactions a day, but would be nice as I say to have that as an option.

I dont know if it's easy to do or but I'll just put this out there.
whenever a member is banned (and since there is no more banned group) his name should be Struck out like this in posts, profile and other places you deem appropriate. A universal symbol which makes you instantly understand that a member is no longer a part of the community.

If you already have a community engaged (I mean really a big community) using with your ips site, then it will be choice using 3party similar classified apps.
If you need something modern, efficient, cool to attract users to use your commerce project, then you need others marketplace solution, example CS-Cart Multivendor, Ordering, Yelo... Etc. If this is the case, ips will be just a forum to handle the part of discussions and administration of information to help your commerce project, but your ips will not the priority, because it will depend on if your marketplace can be builded. 
I see ips has a good community suite to build community, then give to your members the commerce environment... Community + Commerce. If ips the commerce more improvements... This will give more power and ability to ips admins to survive in this world, because if ips admin can not earnings from something (in this case using ips platform), where they get money to continue use ips platform (licenses or IC)? 
Obviously there another group of admins don't depend on ips platform to get income, let's say developer, coder or just ips forums fans, gamers etc. 
Anywhere, it is business vision or plan of each company... WE CAN SEE FACEBOOK ALREADY HAVE THEIR COMMERCE PART WELL BUILDED AND CONTINUE OFFERING ATTRACTIVE IMPROVEMENTS AND FEATURES TO "PEOPLE OF WORLD"... 

As some of you may already know, I'm supporting  @TheJackal84's file since March, 19. We started to talk about this deal on Feb, 21. So in this regard, I would like to state publicity that I am not getting the expected return/attention from TheJackal84, which has not:
given me the list of purchasers of the resources in his website. So what it has to do you with you? I'm not able to add a purchase here on IPS so you can keep downloading updates, if you purchased it there. Why I can't? Because I can't simply trust in words from everyone that requests files. I need to make sure you purchased and when they will expire. Just checked his website and his community doesn't exists anymore: https://flashmodding.com/. If it was there yet you would just need to take a screenshot from the Manage Purchases page. So you can still prove your purchase by sending a PM with the PayPal purchase, etc. In sign of good faith, I will add a full year of support to the proven resources, without take the renewal date in consideration. provided the XML from the plugins, which we can't download from the new marketplace (4.5), so there's no way for me to support these resources now. I will try to get them with IPS (I will speak directly to Lindy). I would also like to inform you that there are other pending issues that are not relevant for this matter but they definitely exists.
Thank you.

Yes, we need possibility for FAQPage tags and HowTos too. It should be a setting per database. For NewsArticle @Andy Millne knows the way 😉 https://invisioncommunity.com/forums/topic/454170-news-sitemap-support-topic/?do=findComment&comment=2838152 
 

I must apologize for being short-worded with my answers. I fear in my attempt to be short and direct, I have left the wrong impression. 
 
 I understood that is how it works now, and that is how it has worked. My initial comment was for @breatheheavy as I was confused and puzzled on how he had managed to unite the e-mail in such a fashion. SendGrid (https://sendgrid.com) as I understood it was a mailing service, and I was puzzled how that server was somehow undermining the internal e-mail system. I admit to ignorance (not knowing better in this instance on how that can happen).  
 
I made my reply before I knew you had replied. 
 
Once you read my comment, I appreciate you took the time to clarify that the two (newsletters -vs.- general e-mails) should operate independently. While I already knew this, I was appreciative that you took the time to address me anyways (thanks). I quickly said that it was good to know in my short-sightedness and that I am looking forward to 4.6. Which I am looking forward to since it will support PHP 8. But there was no way for you to know why I am waiting for 4.6, and my pleasantry comment, with my effort to be short-worded, seems to have given the wrong impression.  
 
I apologize for my miscommunication.
 

Yes, a good suggestion I thought of in the past. How come articles can't have polls? Just extend the system to include it to pages. Shouldn't it be that hard?

Yes, a good suggestion I thought of in the past. How come articles can't have polls? Just extend the system to include it to pages. Shouldn't it be that hard?

Hi, I have a few suggestions for Pages App that I miss a lot after switching from Wordpress. The application itself works great and is very flexible, but it still lacks a lot of options, which I will try to describe below. 
First of all option which I miss on start is a Poll/Vote option, because I cannot add a poll with voting in any way to article, which is available only in the forum application. It would be great to see  possibility to adding a poll into our articles.
Tables - it is not possible to insert tables with a certain number of columns and rows. This option isn't available in any of the apps, but it would be nice to see one in Pages. For example, I am adding a table with 3 columns and 5 rows, e.g. for movies. The columns contain information such as the name of the film, Production Year and Genre, which can be sorted in ascending or descending order, while in the rows we complete the data related to the columns.
Author Box - as simply as the name suggests, adding the option to insert a small window about the author of the content and a short description of it, which would be added as a widget from the side panel in any selected place, e.g. under the content of an article in Pages.
 
These are all my suggestions so far, I hope one of them will be in a newer version of Pages.

It's pretty simple to understand - moderation actions apply on whole thread, not particular posts, so there is no need to display it under each post. 🙂

I honestly don't like to take users out of the community, already with the arrival of Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp and Telegram, the life of the forums is increasingly difficult.
However, the implementation of Telegram with IPS could be useful to notify users in the case of new messages, using it as a sort of push notification, perhaps via an IPS bot.

And there is one:
 

I just started using this to show a banner and realized I can't restrict certain usergroups. 😒
I sell subscriptions with no ads as a feature, but no way to prevent email ads.

In AdminCP System -> Site Promotion -> Advertisements we can add ads on the site and in email notifications. While we can restrict the ads to show only to certain groups, there is no possibility to restrict the email ads to the user group. Why? Please add the ability to restrict the email advertisement to the certain groups. Thank you!

This is a prevalent issue since 4.0 was launched. IPS needs to fix this.

Original code
#elLicenseKey { margin: 0; border-radius: 0; font-size: {fontsize="medium"}}; padding-right: 40px; } rule is closed before padding.
Has to be
#elLicenseKey { margin: 0; border-radius: 0; font-size: {fontsize="medium"}; padding-right: 40px; }  

I dont mind reactions being shown in the notification menu but damn I dont want emails for it. The rest I wouldnt mind the option for emails with but yeah more granular is better with admins setting the default for new accounts with email etc.

I'll do this but only if you promise to stop claiming that the useful collapsing of the quote is the worst thing in the world ever, and if you stop centering all your posts 😉

v2.0.1 has been submitted for approval
What's new?
Plugin is now an application The user option to ignore quotes via 'Ignored users' has been removed - the 'Posts' setting now controls whether to ignore quotes (logical...if you are ignoring someone's posts, a quote is also one of their posts so....) Settings added to allow you (the administrator) to control how truncated quotes behave. Either... Change the number of lines to display (range: 1 to 7 lines) or Don't truncate the quote...expand it (the way it used to be)

I know this is not the "right" way to do this, but I can hide it using js:
Theme > cms > databaseFilters
Add this at the bottom:
<script> var el = document.getElementsByName('cms_record_i_started_checkbox'); if(el[0]) { el[0].parentNode.parentNode.style.cssText = 'display:none'; } </script>  

Thanks @SUBRTX - that's at least a step in the right direction, which is great news.
However, as I've just posted over in the comments on that link, I don't think it's been thought through very well.

Here's what I posted over there.
========================
I just had a closer read of it and and whilst it is a step in the right direction, I still don't think it's amazing.
Most people that use these notifications will still want to be notified when one of their posts is quoted by someone else.
But no-one wants to be notified when their post get a like/reaction.
So, keeping "quoted" and "reactions" bundled into a single option is a mistake in my opinion.
I feel like "quotes" should either be bundled with "replies / mentions" or setup as it's own option.
To be honest - for the best granularity - IMHO all 4 options should be separate.
I.e.
- REPLIES         [ON / OFF]
- MENTIONS   [ON / OFF]
- QUOTES        [ON / OFF]
- REACTIPONS [ON / OFF]

Just a quick question. Does a CLI version of a regular IPS upgrade script exist?
@CoffeeCake ?