Askancy

I generated a new default theme from the admin. (Themes->Create New -> Easy Mode and generates a default template for you.) No, even with the default theme they don't appear.

with both I have this problem. I also tried to regenerate the default template.

I have updated a forum from 4.3 to 4.6, but the reactions to the posts are gone! In 'Reputation & Reactions' I have enabled the 'Reputation Enabled', but in the post there are no reactions... Am I forgetting something? In the groups I didn't find any functions to enable for reaction...

use the translator and read the offenses I received in Italian, this is the user you let it all do here on IPS. (Review removed). This is not the first time the user has been having fake reviews and offends heavily. It would be time for IPS to limit this user.

The user also to me, reviewed the product with 1 star, removed by Rhett. This user has always created problems, just go see the first page of this topic! I reported this issue twice, and it has always been ignored. We pay a license to be able to publish the products on the marketplace, and therefore I expect that there is moderation, not only on the published file but also what is written in the description! If they say this behavior is allowed, then I will miswrite the user's product in the description of my product. But now who is it that moderates the marketplace? I wrote @Stuart Silvester in private but did not answer or read.

A user is distributing a product similar to mine on the marketplace. My product is free, while he has 8 of them all for a fee. The user inaccurately entered in the product description: This is real defamation and denigration of the work of other users. and this is not the first time the user has behaved this way. Every time I release an update of my translation, the user magically releases an update for all his translations, thus hiding mine. In the description of my translation: This is really bad and it would be correct for you from the IPS staff to check this user!

sure? you also stopped answering via PM without investigating for the problem... And it was IPS Staff who said that the problem with my board is your app...

According to the logic should be there this options, instead no (in managing group permissions)... where in my opinion, users should not get too much hands on it... without access modules... but directly from the Users->Groups not?

Hi guys, I can't find this option in the AdminCP, where can I find the option to make profiles accessible only to registered users?

Ok, But if 5 products have example 5 stars, then to order them must go to see the number of reviews, as in the example: On what basis do you choose to view the Ukraine review first instead of the Polish or Spanish one even if they all have five stars, although the others are more “popular” and therefore with a more accurate rating? I sincerely believe that after ordering them by vote, he must also check the number of downloads and number reviews and create an average outside of the number of stars assigned. If a review has 1 rating with 5 stars, but another has 25 votes with an average of 4 stars, I think it should be seen first the one with 4 stars. With this way, the ranking by sort by vote, will always remain unchanged.

I noticed that if in Download one sort items by “Highest Reted”, he only takes into account the number of stars (5) but not how many people have assigned this rating: https://invisioncommunity.com/files/category/161-translations/?sortby=file_rating&sortdirection=desc Here he shows the first Ukrainian translation that has 5 stars but with a review, while in my opinion it should show the Russian translation first, which has 4 and a half stars but based on 12 reviews. Looking at this other category, maybe it's a little clearer: https://invisioncommunity.com/files/category/160-applications-and-plugins/?sortby=file_rating&sortdirection=desc Obviously I don't know if it's me who misunderstood his sort by Higher Vote.. But I think higher rating should make a comparison between rating -> reviews, while sorting for multiple reviewed should only take into account those who received more reviews though all negative.

You are not interested in community feedback. Just see how you listened to users about the marketplace revolution. By changing the rules of the marketplace suddenly, you changed the ideal of the product. I found myself with a completely unusable forum because it installed inside the Laravel public folder, and url masked by the htaccess, and your oauth could not validate. not to mention the support that started pointing the finger at cloudflare and server configuration, without giving a real hand to a problem you provoked. You at IP.Board are not interested in listening to the community.

Is there any news? My clients always contact me to tell me that the button to change author has disappeared...

I pose another conundrum, If I purchase your Steam Profile Integration resource, and you decided not to renew the license anymore, I lose the ability to install it since it disappears from the marketplace and I don't have any files locally? Sincerely the file local allows me to analyze the code and implement an IP.board resource with my site in Laravel, just like I did as Custom Links, now everything turns out more machinous. I love Evanto's method, although I hate the fact that if a Developer deletes the resource who bought it lost it, because it was the buyer's job to save it in a cloud storage. Unfortunately IP.Board now doesn't even allow this anymore.