-
Posts
6,261 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
40
Reputation Activity
-
Morrigan got a reaction from niKee in Convert to Topic
Okay. Which at face value, to me, is a database record from the pages app to a forum topic since this is an IPS support forum. 😉
-
Morrigan got a reaction from niKee in Convert to Topic
To be clear I believe they are talking about a pages database to a topic which is not natively possible.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Linux-Is-Best in Post count reduced to short form in topics
How so? The first one is at the top of my profile where you said it didn’t exist anymore. It’s still a prominent feature of a profile.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Luuuk in Has member title been removed?
The achievements system doesn't exclusively rely on reputation for ranks @Luuuk
-
Morrigan got a reaction from abobader in "Kindness" plugin
Read nuisance and people will check it and STILL not give two damns about it. Its a barrier for posting and NOTHING more.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from SebastienG in Multiple owners/authors
I’ve complained before that wiki editing shouldn’t have an original author, or owner, at all. While the authors/editors should be in the editing history the listing itself should never truly have a single author.
It should be possible, especially in pages, to set multiple owners. You see this behavior on major websites such as Microsoft where the people that have contributed/have ownership of the listing are listed as “contributors”. I would like to empower my users to allow secondary editors to some of the contributions so those people also have the ability to edit their content. Sort of like adding a moderator to a forum, do it at the listing level in pages.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Ibai in Multiple owners/authors
Again, I don't think this is a feature that needs to be added to forums. This is a feature that needs to be added to pages. Pages has its own thing and I think that Topics need to be unique to the users and SHOULD NOT be shared by multiple people. Pages articles/records, on the other hand, should have this capability especially on large sites where you want content submitters but not necessarily a million moderators.
Its like "group blog" adjacent but at the article/record level of pages where you can add those that are permitted to make changes to the article that are non-staff members.
So:
I own an article but I need you @Jordan Invision to be able to edit the article because you're a person that knows about the subject/article/company/listing/thing that the article is about. I add you as "additional editors" or whatever you want to call it. Now, even though you're not a mod/admin you have the "can edit" functionality on my article, you can click edit and make changes as needed but I still own the article. Then, lets say you are no longer the business on this article and or no longer interested in updating it. I can remove you and add someone else to edit said article.
That mod only works if you are also using the "account switcher" mod and you allow people to create accounts that multiple people can log into. Which is technically the only solution for what I'm asking for at the moment but the account security there makes me cringe.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from The Old Man in "Kindness" plugin
Read nuisance and people will check it and STILL not give two damns about it. Its a barrier for posting and NOTHING more.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Daniel F in Page/forum names on page
No because there is no “current forum” as fluid view is basically displaying all forums once.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from DamonT in Better badge look in Topic
Agreed but not all up in the business:
A users Avatar is their identity. I don't think we should all @Jordan Invision and have +1's all over it.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Jordan Miller in Better badge look in Topic
Agreed but not all up in the business:
A users Avatar is their identity. I don't think we should all @Jordan Invision and have +1's all over it.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from zyx in Announcement as notification
Custom Notifications is amazing!!! I use Group mention only for my staff to mention other staff teams because I recommend my staff follow staff relevant forums so my users don't need the ability to do that.
I know custom notifications will never be implemented as core, its been said before but I can't recall the post. Its basically seen as intrusive to a users experience.
For me I use it to remind people of stuff.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from IP-Gamers in Moving the notification/login and profile area
Something like this:
https://metrobeyond.com/
???
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Maxxius in Announcement as notification
Custom Notifications is amazing!!! I use Group mention only for my staff to mention other staff teams because I recommend my staff follow staff relevant forums so my users don't need the ability to do that.
I know custom notifications will never be implemented as core, its been said before but I can't recall the post. Its basically seen as intrusive to a users experience.
For me I use it to remind people of stuff.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from sobrenome in Multiple owners/authors
Again, I don't think this is a feature that needs to be added to forums. This is a feature that needs to be added to pages. Pages has its own thing and I think that Topics need to be unique to the users and SHOULD NOT be shared by multiple people. Pages articles/records, on the other hand, should have this capability especially on large sites where you want content submitters but not necessarily a million moderators.
Its like "group blog" adjacent but at the article/record level of pages where you can add those that are permitted to make changes to the article that are non-staff members.
So:
I own an article but I need you @Jordan Invision to be able to edit the article because you're a person that knows about the subject/article/company/listing/thing that the article is about. I add you as "additional editors" or whatever you want to call it. Now, even though you're not a mod/admin you have the "can edit" functionality on my article, you can click edit and make changes as needed but I still own the article. Then, lets say you are no longer the business on this article and or no longer interested in updating it. I can remove you and add someone else to edit said article.
That mod only works if you are also using the "account switcher" mod and you allow people to create accounts that multiple people can log into. Which is technically the only solution for what I'm asking for at the moment but the account security there makes me cringe.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from marklcfc in Better badge look in Topic
Agreed but not all up in the business:
A users Avatar is their identity. I don't think we should all @Jordan Invision and have +1's all over it.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from SeNioR- in Better badge look in Topic
I think the badges are rather massive compared to the actual avatar personally. But I also have thought that the avatar is rather small for years, could just be me though. It just covers a lot:
It's almost like @SeNioR- has a badge beauty mark on that handsome face.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Jordan Miller in Multiple owners/authors
Again, I don't think this is a feature that needs to be added to forums. This is a feature that needs to be added to pages. Pages has its own thing and I think that Topics need to be unique to the users and SHOULD NOT be shared by multiple people. Pages articles/records, on the other hand, should have this capability especially on large sites where you want content submitters but not necessarily a million moderators.
Its like "group blog" adjacent but at the article/record level of pages where you can add those that are permitted to make changes to the article that are non-staff members.
So:
I own an article but I need you @Jordan Invision to be able to edit the article because you're a person that knows about the subject/article/company/listing/thing that the article is about. I add you as "additional editors" or whatever you want to call it. Now, even though you're not a mod/admin you have the "can edit" functionality on my article, you can click edit and make changes as needed but I still own the article. Then, lets say you are no longer the business on this article and or no longer interested in updating it. I can remove you and add someone else to edit said article.
That mod only works if you are also using the "account switcher" mod and you allow people to create accounts that multiple people can log into. Which is technically the only solution for what I'm asking for at the moment but the account security there makes me cringe.
-
Morrigan reacted to Matt in Hump Day: Achievements Improvements
There is now a separate page to show rank progression and badges earned.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from MEVi in Please restore the choice of reactions here at IPS!
😭😭😭😭
Well this didn't work as intended. I intended to post 50 of the same emoji and well... I'm just not that cruel to scroll bars but not as simple as you'd think which just makes me more sad.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Afrodude in Hump Day: Achievements Improvements
Is there a page that explains ranks? Because I’m 13 of 13 and all I can tell is it’s because I have a million billion posts like the old post rank system. Makes me sad if that’s all I’m rank 13 for.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from Max in Recent threads -- php code
Do you use pages? As they have external widgets!!
-
Morrigan reacted to Aramaech in Allow for many reaction emojis
I feel compelled to reiterate that adding this functionality would not detract from or even change the existing functionality at all, in any way.
-
Morrigan got a reaction from sobrenome in Multiple owners/authors
I’ve complained before that wiki editing shouldn’t have an original author, or owner, at all. While the authors/editors should be in the editing history the listing itself should never truly have a single author.
It should be possible, especially in pages, to set multiple owners. You see this behavior on major websites such as Microsoft where the people that have contributed/have ownership of the listing are listed as “contributors”. I would like to empower my users to allow secondary editors to some of the contributions so those people also have the ability to edit their content. Sort of like adding a moderator to a forum, do it at the listing level in pages.
-