Jump to content

13.

Clients
  • Posts

    1,233
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Posts posted by 13.

  1. Sometimes, as the forum evolves, it becomes necessary to merge categories. It would be great if this feature was available out of the box and worked the same way as when merging topics, i.e. all topics from the merged sections are moved to one selected, and the URL of the old section is redirected to the new one with the HTTP code 301.

  2. What is IndexNow?

    IndexNow is an easy way for websites owners to instantly inform search engines about latest content changes on their website. In its simplest form, IndexNow is a simple ping so that search engines know that a URL and its content has been added, updated, or deleted, allowing search engines to quickly reflect this change in their search results.

    Without IndexNow, it can take days to weeks for search engines to discover that the content has changed, as search engines don’t crawl every URL often. With IndexNow, search engines know immediately the "URLs that have changed, helping them prioritize crawl for these URLs and thereby limiting organic crawling to discover new content."

    IndexNow is offered under the terms of the Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons License and has support from Microsoft Bing, Yandex.

  3. 24 minutes ago, Randy Calvert said:

    It does not make sense for customers to be able to edit IPS’ source code for everyone else. I frankly don’t trust anyone else to make changes that might compromise my site’s security or performance. Those developers I do trust, I use applications available in the marketplace or hire them to custom develop something for me. 

    Have you ever heard about code review before merging?

    None of those concerns are valid because code review before merging a code from pull requests was invented exactly for this. Obviously, no one is suggesting adding code directly to the repo without the proper review.

    This is how most of the code in the world is written. Especially the code you already have on your server, from the OS to every little third-party library used in IPS.

    This is a much easier and faster way for IPS to fix things like this with the help of the community.

  4. On 8/19/2021 at 10:54 PM, Everade said:

    One single line is all it needs my fellow devs

    This forum section is full of topics about trivial fixes and improvements that are very easy to do.

    I hope someday IPS will give active clients access to the repository to create pull requests, so that we can fix it ourselves, and we don't have to wait for years for such small things to be fixed (or never fixed).

  5. 36 minutes ago, Stuart Silvester said:

    We added it to profile photos.

    We can't completely replace the Javascript solution yet, Safari & iOS do not support the native method. It is on our radar though and we're keeping an eye on support.

    It would be better to use the native method everywhere and fallback to the JS-based method only when needed, so the majority of users of modern browsers won't experience problems just because of a minority of technically backward Apple browsers. It's very easy because native lazy loading works perfectly fine when used with JS-based method at the same time.

  6. For me, it is not important which editor to use, but how exactly it will be customized by IPS.

    The main thing I hope for is that IPS won't carry over all the same bugs that they added to the current editor and haven't been fixing for years. Such as the complete inability to delete mentions in mobile Chrome, for example:


    As well as get rid of additional overcomplications, such as replacing existing editor functions. For example, fast and easy URL embedding on clumsy and slow:

    👍 image.png.64b8e263498b9f56fa7ddc4674940e60.png  


    👎 image.thumb.png.fa1d3a68383653d764d67326bd355229.png

  7. I also would love to see here an option to display these messages to all users but without mentioning the exact moderator, who performed the action.

    I.e., groups with permissions will see:

    • %username% changed the title from "ABC" to "123"
    • %username% moved %n% messages to the %topic%

    While ordinary users will see:

    • Moderator changed the title from "ABC" to "123"
    • Moderator moved %n% messages to the %topic%

    Where %username% is the username and Moderator is just text.

×
×
  • Create New...