Jump to content

Rhett

Clients
  • Posts

    8,312
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Posts posted by Rhett

  1. 2 hours ago, Maxxius said:

    @AlexWright thank you so much for this post! It helped me make the IDENTICAL fURLs I had customized back in the day on 3.4.x to be the same in 4.4!

    BTW my default app will be Pages.

    What you did not mention that you have to translate is

    
    "topLevel": "forums",

    to your language. Thus I was able to translate this toplevel fURL and translated the rest in ACP and in the end I got results such as:

    http://website.com/forum/f1/forum-category-name/
    http://website.com/forum/t46405/topic-name/

    Basically you have to do this for every app you want to translate, go to its folder, find furl.json file and edit it.

    Today IPS support told me this can't be done, but there it is. 🙂

    We do not support nor should you ever edit a core file.  So it cannot be done following the rules in stock form as noted in your ticket.  

     

     

  2. I feel some are overthinking this, thinking that if it's not in your sitemap then it won't get indexed, that really isn't the way Google and other search engines work, a sitemap is basically to kick start indexing. The goal for any site is to get the content indexed, a sitemap kick starts this and provides info for search engines to get started indexing, as they do, they will naturally index the whole site based on links, etc on your site as normal. 

    I wouldn't think of a sitemap as a must have for every single item, think of it more as a way to push start the indexing process and let the search engines do their thing by indexing the complete site as they are crawling. If a topic is being crawled, search engines will certainly pick up the replies to this topic and index them too.  🙂

     

     

  3. 1 minute ago, Wolf said:

    U2F is more secure, and is supported by the security paranoid (such as myself)... I use it on my Google account too.

    Here is the old support topic for it, longer ago than I thought, 2012. 

     

     

     

     

  4. 1 hour ago, All Astronauts said:

    @Lindy for lack of knowing which developer to @

    Is this on tap for 4.3? I noticed the FA website itself has now flashed over to 5 and parked the 4x stuff in a sub-section. 

    There is no need to tag anyone really as we all read this feedback section regularly.  From what I understand the changes needed for font awesome 5 are pretty large, too large to hold up 4.3, which is already in the stages of internal testing. 

    Thank you

     

  5. 7 minutes ago, Tom S. said:

    I'm confused and probably completely miss the point :D. But how does someone pay with something worth $4,666. (it's much higher now too I believe)

    To me bitcoin is less a currency and more a commodity. People buy it for its potential value rather than a means to purchase things with.

    If someone could explain to me how it works I would be thankful.

    It would be a decimal value, example, 140.00 would equal 0.00859188 BTC with a value of $15,669.45 per BTC

     

  6. Well done Martin!  I commend you for cleaning up this application and making it awesome again!  I used it on many of my sites years ago, it was great, but needed some updating, I will be using it again now as it's very nicely done! Great job! 

  7. 1 hour ago, Kevin Carwile said:

    I agree, it should not take longer than 30 seconds to save a category. In fact, it should not take longer than a couple of seconds max.

    Does anybody not using IPS Hosting have these issues?

    Unfortunately, I have found that IPS Hosting is a shared server environment that does not meet certain requirements for the GC app. It is configured specifically to meets the needs of IPS core, which is great, but as soon as you step outside of those operating parameters then it becomes problematic and rigid.

    For example, the category configuration form for GC typically contains more form elements than the configuration of IPS servers will allow to be submitted at one time. Most servers support this without a configuration change, but occasionally a server will have its limits set too low for GC. 

    Usually you can make the configuration change yourself or ask your host to loosen things up which will solve many problems. IPS cloud community however is not one of those where the configuration can be customized.

    Because of this, I'm not sure what can really be done to rectify the problem.

    With that said, if you want to go ahead and PM me with details for your site, l'll have a look at it to see if there is anything I can do.

    There is nothing wrong with our hosting, and it's not a typical shared setup by far, however I will note your app here is the #1 source of tickets since 4.0 was released.

    Please don't try and pass the buck here to our hosting being an issue when it's not. I believe the 469 replies here to this topic back that up as well.

     

     


  8. Do you mean as a seperate hook? - ala Nexus.



    Or using the location field that's already there?




    Well the location field that is already there would be simply awesome.... not sure if that can be done though. If it can... you will have a nice little donation coming your way!
×
×
  • Create New...