Batnik Posted November 27, 2015 Posted November 27, 2015 There is one setting now: Moderate new records But one VERY Important setting is missing:Moderate records changes Without this setting the whole system is useless as the user can post cool new posts and after they get approved they are posting porn stuff in it ... and i dont even get informed about post changes AT ALL!!! do i always have to get there and see if there is changed content ... every hour, every minute? So why dont moderate post changes? Here is a possible solution: after the user changes the post inform moderator save a copy of this post: "set this post for moderation" from now on this user sees only this "edit-copy" of this post, all other users see the original post let the user edit this copy so many times he wants to after every submit, the post is sent for submiting (if revisions are enabled only this revision) no need to hide or delete the original post unit changes are confirmed as its different postID if revisions are enabled => use it insead of postID or always use revisions when wiki-editing is enabled after the moderator confirmed the changes ovverride the orginal post with the new version delete the copy or save a revision inform user => post approved This system right now makes absolutely no sense without changes-moderation. So please make some changes or disable it completly. What you think? Askancy, esquire, sobrenome and 15 others 18
opentype Posted November 27, 2015 Posted November 27, 2015 I agree to the feature request. However, I would suggest that you stick to calm factual descriptions for such requests. IPS will judge the feature request by itself. It doesn’t need red, exclamation marks or exaggerations (i.e. “it’s useless”). If it helps you as a work-around: On my 3.4 site I monitor Wiki article changes by having set up blocks which are ordered by last change. It’s much easier to spot changes this way. Hegnauer.io, Metor, sobrenome and 2 others 5
chilihead Posted November 27, 2015 Posted November 27, 2015 (edited) Really need this. With an expansive database this could fill up with not only malicious info but erroneous info you do not approve of. We have editors for such approvals that will research the changes, this is really needed for a clean and professional database or records. Edited November 27, 2015 by chilihead esquire, Markus Jung, NewRockRabbit and 3 others 6
esquire Posted November 28, 2015 Posted November 28, 2015 10 hours ago, opentype said: I agree to the feature request. However, I would suggest that you stick to calm factual descriptions for such requests. IPS will judge the feature request by itself. It doesn’t need red, exclamation marks or exaggerations (i.e. “it’s useless”). If it helps you as a work-around: On my 3.4 site I monitor Wiki article changes by having set up blocks which are ordered by last change. It’s much easier to spot changes this way. I agree with the OP even though you do have a point. Perhaps "urgent fix needed" may be technically the most accurate. While I can appreciate your workaround I can say that on active or visible sites the notion of editing away mass spam is an utter nightmare. You'll spend significant time needlessly deleting automated entries or those created by human drones. It's why I haven't implemented certain features as of yet. sobrenome, NewRockRabbit, Hegnauer.io and 1 other 4
sobrenome Posted November 28, 2015 Posted November 28, 2015 Please, upgrade wiki database like described! Hegnauer.io and chilihead 2
sudo Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 Bump on this permission again. Would really make things a bit easier and safer. sobrenome and Hegnauer.io 2
Batnik Posted February 1, 2016 Author Posted February 1, 2016 after several months there is still no solution from invision ... sobrenome, TheWorldNewsMedia.org and Hegnauer.io 2 1
sobrenome Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 Please, correct this moderation fault. Hegnauer.io 1
-FP Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) Yeah I guess this is kinda needed. Edited February 1, 2016 by -FP sobrenome and Hegnauer.io 2
Apfelstrudel Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 I agree. We need this modification of the wiki permission system. Hegnauer.io and sobrenome 2
Hegnauer.io Posted November 15, 2018 Posted November 15, 2018 3 years and no solution? sobrenome and Markus Jung 2
QWio Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 This is an absolute must. +1 Daniel Raede, sobrenome, Hegnauer.io and 1 other 4
TheWorldNewsMedia.org Posted February 23, 2019 Posted February 23, 2019 This is not good news..... as someone who was about to start using the wiki more..... Maybe I should hold off ? sobrenome 1
Dll Posted February 24, 2019 Posted February 24, 2019 (edited) Since this thread was started in 2015, you may be waiting a while.... Edited February 24, 2019 by Dll sobrenome 1
kmk Posted August 10, 2019 Posted August 10, 2019 I started using the wiki mode, please release something it seems a serious problem. Markus Jung, sudo and sobrenome 3
Markus Jung Posted August 15, 2019 Posted August 15, 2019 With an option to moderate changes I would start using the wiki functionality. I think this has a lot of potential. Joy Rex and sobrenome 2
Fast Lane! Posted August 15, 2019 Posted August 15, 2019 @bfarber Any comments from IPB Staff? sobrenome 1
bfarber Posted August 15, 2019 Posted August 15, 2019 We don't comment on every suggestion - I don't have any specific comments right now, no. sobrenome 1
TheWorldNewsMedia.org Posted September 8, 2019 Posted September 8, 2019 @Batnik last visited a year and a half ago..... (which was about 3 years after his initial feature request) sobrenome 1
Batnik Posted September 8, 2019 Author Posted September 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, TheWorldNewsMedia.org said: @Batnik last visited a year and a half ago..... (which was about 3 years after his initial feature request) Yeah and they still did not fix it, omg ... TheWorldNewsMedia.org and sobrenome 1 1
Markus Jung Posted September 9, 2019 Posted September 9, 2019 On 8/15/2019 at 3:52 PM, bfarber said: We don't comment on every suggestion - I don't have any specific comments right now, no. But maybe you can tell us if this topic is on your list for features/improvements? sobrenome 1
AlexJ Posted September 21, 2019 Posted September 21, 2019 Definitely need the feature enhancement. +1 Markus Jung and sobrenome 2
Recommended Posts