SUBRTX

Hey, I'm experiencing same behaviour.
GTmetrix reports slow execution times in this library. Is there any recommendation on how to solve this?

It would be amazing to use IPS with Next.js. I did all that I could to meet google core web vitals standards, but my community is still ranked as poor. With the current IPS software design I suppose that is impossible to be ranked as fast by google. And for those that need Adsense, absolutely impossible.

I can confirm our next release (4.6) will include lazy loading for profile photos. 🙂

We have more lazy loading updates on the way as well. Check them out here (and please comment 😊)
 
 

I'm not sure if this suppose to be a "bug"?
You know IPS gives every new member with default "profile picture" (First letter of username by default)
I tried to setup a trophy to reward anyone who upload a "profile picture" the real one, but then when I enabled the trophy, this app started to sending out notification to everyone.

so I think this criteria is useless.
 
I'm not sure though If I choose the first option, does this app still think everyone has already had a profile picture?

Right now in club I can create topics feature, it is a forum no? I mean if in that forum add ability to select which club members can see it. So as Club owner can create different forums(or topics) for differents groups as an entire community in the club. 

Hey there. Are you asking if it's possible to have a club include only specific members, but in that club only a select members can see the forum inside the club? 
Say that three times fast 🥴

I'm planning an upgrade from 4.4.x to 4.5.x next week.  Any chance there will be an update before then?  Thanks!

FWIW if your users download images as WebP, they probably can't open/view them on their desktop either. Windows, at the very least, does not recognize WebP as an image format.
You should avoid having your users download images in WebP format. Serving them in-browser is fine, but the original downloads should always be PNG, JPEG, GIF or so on until this changes.

Its been 4 years of this, is there any planning on this topic?

Where is the file?

That is not a practical solution in my view, for those who wish to post.  They want to see their post up immediately, and not later whether two minutes or 20 when the mods get to it.  Requiring all posts to be approved would discourage people from posting, an inhibitor to posting and would damage the forum environment.  (I speak from experience after being on forums posting for over 20 years)
Your suggestion is a solution presented to me earlier, (not in this thread) and I appreciate it, but feel it would not achieve my objectives.  But I do thank you for pondering it all...

@TheJackal84 I read above that the last submission was rejected again because it altered the IPS core database tables.
 It seems that that is the problem with the latest submissions. Will you fix that and submit the files again? Or can't Sticky Noted function without altering the  IPS before database? I guess it can. So, my question is, why isn't it done? You have a queue of clients waiting for that for months. I just don't understand, and I can imagine that so many other users won't understand either.
I haven't purchased it yet, will do once it's approved by IPS as per their guidelines. Thanks a lot
 

I think the ignore feature needs a few more features to be useful.  Right now it really serves no purpose other than to make members angry/upset when they try to use it and find out it doesn't really serve a purpose.  Most sites give you the ability to actually block someone, preventing them from seeing your content or your account.  My members have been begging me for improvements to this feature or to implement a true blocking system, but it's odd to me that previous people who have requested this are never responded to, or are basically told just use the ignore feature as is and act like an adult about it.
The internet if filled with millions of people of all ages, and just because someone is an adult doesn't mean they'll act like one.  I don't think it's unreasonable to provide a little more in terms of someone feeling more secure about their privacy.
User A ignores User B, so all applicable content by User B is now hidden to User A, and User B is unable to send private messages to User A.  However, User B doesn't know they are being ignored by User A and has no restrictions given to them.  The ignore system works basically as if User A is the one being blocked from User B's content which seems backwards.  User B should be aware they are blocked and have the consequence of User A basically not existing to them in any capacity.
My members are requesting these common blocking features:
A blocked/ignored user cannot see the content of the blocker. A blocked/ignored user cannot view the account profile of the blocker. A blocked/ignored user cannot tag/mention the blocker in any content. If there is a plugin or app that already implements these improvements, please direct me to it.  If not, I can assure anyone who creates one will receive immediate downloads/sales.

does it affect how thrid party app/plugin work?! 

Hello, IPS from version 4.5, compatible with 7.4 PHP😉

This is my biggest bugbear with recent invision releases

There used to be a tick box and a 'select all' option
You could just click 'select all' then 'delete'
It saved hours of admin team time

Hey guys! I can confirm that in our upcoming release we have added support for PHP 8 🎉 

What drop down? Inside the ckeditor? It loads instant for me. No delay, no animation.

And yes you can disable the emojis here:

15k forums? What the . Please let me see that labyrinth of yours.

I have written a lot about this subject, incl. and i have a design to use the critical CSS to remove the Render-blocking CSS. Yes, it works, but it takes a lot of time to analyze and develop a good critical CSS.
For a few days I've been exploring another idea that came to my mind.
Code in IncludeCSS works perfectly and this code tells the browser - download all those CSS and use them to represent the site. But this code does not tell the browser when and how to use them.
The idea I'm using right now is - I created a new template that I put before closing the tag head. In my experiment, this template looks like this:
{template="preload_css" app="core" location="global" group="analysis" params=""} In this template I placed this code
{{foreach array_unique( \IPS\Output::i()->cssFiles, SORT_STRING ) as $file}} <link rel='preload' href='{expression="\IPS\Http\Url::external( $file )->setQueryString( 'v', \IPS\CACHEBUST_KEY )"}' as="style"> {{endforeach}} {{$customCss = \IPS\Theme::i()->css( 'custom.css', 'core', 'front' );}} {{foreach $customCss as $css}} <link rel='preload' href='{expression="\IPS\Http\Url::external( $css )->setQueryString( 'v', \IPS\CACHEBUST_KEY )"}' as="style"> {{endforeach}} Now, besides a browser command to download all CSS, I send the browser a command - use these CSS as a matter of priority.
And the result of over 100 my tests - no render-blocking CSS ...
There are no side effects or any other bad impact.
I've installed it on my live site and it works perfectly.
If a development team wishes, let him test it and apply it in later releases. This will speed up all sites using this really good platform.

@Michael.J Could you add 'groups' to the top point's widget, or have a separate one. I need a way to see how many points each group has so I can sort out prizes for the group the works at earning the most points.
A global stats page would be even better that one can view on the front end or in ACP.
Also, I need a way to disable points for certain groups, one being the admins/staff. Having an option in ACP to disable/select would be desirable.

Please, please, please! I've been asking for a good couple of years now! 🥰

The current Reputation and Reaction feature could use some enhancements. Currently it's either ON or OFF.  It does allow Groups to be excluded which is good.
We would like to see the following additional features added at some point soon in the future
Reputations - Filter by Forums, On/Off per forum Reputations - Exclude by Member, On/Off Reactions - Customizable count for maximum reactions in a set period of time on per User level  

just upgraded to IPS 4.5.
Already received one complain about the crazy notification list...
We need the option to separate Mentions & My Content!