jesuralem

What's New in Version 1.0.2  
added two options: clean all private messages started by deleted members (with ID: 0), clean all replies in private messages added by deleted members (with ID: 0)  
@jesuralem, @sound

Hi @Andy Millne, the "previous competitions" view could really use a "view all entries" button for each competition.
My users are saying that clicking on the competition title is not so obvious, and tend to agree :).

On my community not only we do not require real names but we do not tolerate that users give the name of other users. Of course everyone is free to give his own real name if he likes it.
Asking forum owner to verify real identity is just a nonsence, what tool do we have to make sure of it ? are we supposed to ask for an ID Card ? and if yes how are we supposed to check it is not a fake and it is indeed the one of the member ? In France only a police officer is allowed to ask for an ID card...
This is typically political BS... If someone posts something illegal we are already logging the IP addresses and have to give it to the authorities, so nobody is anonymous on the internet, and everybody knows it... All the laws needed already exist.
 

Found another visual bug. Vote button and "who voted" does not fit in the box
https://www.bmw2002faq.com/competition/entry/2-bmw-gathering-issaquah-wa-may-2019/
 
 

Seems to me that what you want is a chat or a shoutbox.

This is great, thanks a lot for the quick correction, I'll try it tomorrow.
Just if I can influence the roadmap, the top requests of my users :
- a lightbox to see the pictures almost full screen
- the exif display option
- next/previous buttons to go easily through all entries of a competition.
On a more personal note I'd like a watermark option and more configuration options for the front (display the top 3 or just all entries the same, choose the number of entries per row, etc...)

Also a quick bug : new comments on an entry are not displayed as unread (bold) in the activity stream.

This is great, thanks a lot for the quick correction, I'll try it tomorrow.
Just if I can influence the roadmap, the top requests of my users :
- a lightbox to see the pictures almost full screen
- the exif display option
- next/previous buttons to go easily through all entries of a competition.
On a more personal note I'd like a watermark option and more configuration options for the front (display the top 3 or just all entries the same, choose the number of entries per row, etc...)

Also a quick bug : new comments on an entry are not displayed as unread (bold) in the activity stream.

Sorry, IPS land is busy busy busy right now. I've uploaded a new version (1.3.1) that should resolve this @jesuralem @emeric73
Random and newest entries widgets are on the 1.4 todo list.

I had the same complaint regarding the fact that the top three are more visible than all other entries in the competition view...

I had the same complaint regarding the fact that the top three are more visible than all other entries in the competition view...

I support that - but some members complain that it is difficult to "climb" up to leader. So suggest a setting for random image as well.

Sorry I missed this. I don't currently have a public release date for 1.4. It's coming along nicely but there have been some good suggestions here and I would like to squeeze a few more in.

I think the best option would be to be able to save several sidebar configurations and choose to which forums each one apply.
It would be a pain to have to set every forum one by one for users who have a final configuration.

In my opinion you do not have any obligations but it must depend on your local regulations.
Most sites I know have a disclaimer in the term of use saying there is no guarantee that the site will be accessible.

I actually see it as a major risk for us as it goes along with Google approach to provide information in the search results instead of giving a link to the site where the info is.
In the end the users just don't go to your site, so you don't get anything... 
I get that Google does not want users to leave their sites but this policy can probably make a huge number of site disappear...

Good idea. I’ll add this to the suggestions list for future versions. 
For the next release I will be focussing on voting fraud prevention but this is a nice easily implemented suggestion that could be added after that. 

Hi, I am surprised this hasn't been asked before, but an option to watermark the photo uploaded by users would be nice.
Maybe with the username and the site name or logo for example. I guess users and admin would like it so they picture don't get "stolen"
I haven't bought this app yet but will definitely. I just had a lot of changes on my site and wait for my users to acclimate 🙂

Google basically dictates the whole internet standard with threats that your ranking will drop off you don't comply.
So everybody complies, ips as well as everybody else.

Google basically dictates the whole internet standard with threats that your ranking will drop off you don't comply.
So everybody complies, ips as well as everybody else.

On my community not only we do not require real names but we do not tolerate that users give the name of other users. Of course everyone is free to give his own real name if he likes it.
Asking forum owner to verify real identity is just a nonsence, what tool do we have to make sure of it ? are we supposed to ask for an ID Card ? and if yes how are we supposed to check it is not a fake and it is indeed the one of the member ? In France only a police officer is allowed to ask for an ID card...
This is typically political BS... If someone posts something illegal we are already logging the IP addresses and have to give it to the authorities, so nobody is anonymous on the internet, and everybody knows it... All the laws needed already exist.
 

On my community not only we do not require real names but we do not tolerate that users give the name of other users. Of course everyone is free to give his own real name if he likes it.
Asking forum owner to verify real identity is just a nonsence, what tool do we have to make sure of it ? are we supposed to ask for an ID Card ? and if yes how are we supposed to check it is not a fake and it is indeed the one of the member ? In France only a police officer is allowed to ask for an ID card...
This is typically political BS... If someone posts something illegal we are already logging the IP addresses and have to give it to the authorities, so nobody is anonymous on the internet, and everybody knows it... All the laws needed already exist.
 

Hi @Fosters, i think you must be confusing me with semone else, we never exchanged a single PM :).