Dll

I used a generator 😇 
https://api.bionic-reading.com/convert/
There's an API on another site so in theory if someone loves it, perhaps it could work within a community. Low-key curious about how people would use it. 

The main difference is you are able to sell advertising space directly to your members. 
 

The layout shifts near the top of the screen in live topics when there is another user online. The space really needs to be reserved on page load to avoid it impacting CLS scores on core web vitals, I think.

It’s on our list 🙂 

It doesn't solve the data privacy issue and I'd rather put energy into APIs to make it easier to integrate with third party apps and code.

Honestly, I'm not entirely comfortable with the idea of third parties directly executing SQL queries on customer databases. If it all goes wrong, we have to dig out back-ups to fix it. This is not a slight on anyone's abilities, I've deleted an entire table of customer tickets with a mistyped query. It happens.
We are not going to create a system where third parties have access to the client databases. There is no audit trail for what actions were taken. When our team need to access a cloud site, we complete a reason form which is stored to form part of an audit trail so we know exactly what was accessed and why. We also have to access via a fixed IP address VPN so there is a data trail.
We take our cloud customer's security and data very seriously.
The SQL toolbox should have been removed a decade ago in all honesty. As we move forward with our cloud platform, more and more SQL tables will be stored centrally and not exposed to the client in any case, meaning admins won't have access to all the data the community uses which could case a lot of confusion.

(Edited later to add:)
In terms of what to do with debugging, I do sympathise. I generally made prodigious use of the simple \IPS\Log::log( json_encode( $data ), 'argh_send_help' ); logger. I have also in the past used \IPS\Db::i()->select(...); in combination with \IPS\Log::log() to inspect a single row of data.

I glanced over that as well 😄  so don't feel bad.
If this is something you'd like to see in the core product, please create a topic in our Feature Suggestions forum so it can be further collaborated on by our community and it won't get lost in our Support forum 🙂 .

If you use Google tag manager you can push event/commerce or any sort of data your like through it, to be added to things like Google analytics.
https://developers.google.com/tag-platform/tag-manager/web/datalayer
 

If you use Google tag manager you can push event/commerce or any sort of data your like through it, to be added to things like Google analytics.
https://developers.google.com/tag-platform/tag-manager/web/datalayer
 

There is nothing wrong with staying informed about the entire product line. After all, some admins will be interested in switching to the cloud offer, if it provides features or benefits they might want. So, they want to get that information as well. We just need to be able to easily tell which new feature applies to which plan. 

Ah, well Jordan's original statement feels a bit disingenuous then. Not great, I have to say. 

Oh. 😔 I was not trying to be disingenuous or use slick marketing talk. I could have phrased it better it seems. My apologies. 

It can take Google search results several weeks, if not into months to settle down when you redirect to be URLs etc. It's a waiting game I'm afraid.

I think some on here have a weird sense of entitlement, expecting the same features to be developed for them, despite using what is a different product (self-hosted vs hosted), with a different (cheaper) price. 

Or, they're using third party tools, which specialise in privacy law compliance. There are plenty out there.

Or, they're using third party tools, which specialise in privacy law compliance. There are plenty out there.

I think the truth of the situation is that the clients on these forums aren't really the clients that Invision are developing their products for.
I suspect it's mostly (perhaps almost solely) the priorities of and feedback from enterprise clients which is driving their development and future planning. 
I'm sure it's part of the reason why there's a reasonable sub section of those on these forums who clearly feel undervalued right now (along with price hikes, changes to support, long lived bugs, and parts of the software suffering from a lack of attention). It's also the reason why some of the communication from Invision can come across as a bit tone deaf and rile people up at times.
I'm not criticising particularly, as far as I'm concerned it's just the way it is. It's just a case of matching expectations to reality in my mind.

This is still happening at the moment.

I think the truth of the situation is that the clients on these forums aren't really the clients that Invision are developing their products for.
I suspect it's mostly (perhaps almost solely) the priorities of and feedback from enterprise clients which is driving their development and future planning. 
I'm sure it's part of the reason why there's a reasonable sub section of those on these forums who clearly feel undervalued right now (along with price hikes, changes to support, long lived bugs, and parts of the software suffering from a lack of attention). It's also the reason why some of the communication from Invision can come across as a bit tone deaf and rile people up at times.
I'm not criticising particularly, as far as I'm concerned it's just the way it is. It's just a case of matching expectations to reality in my mind.

A patch has now been released to resolve this issue. Please visit support in your admin CP, and select to apply the optional patches present to resolve this.

@Adriano Faria has made an excellent plug-in which goes some way to creating that.
 

@Adriano Faria has made an excellent plug-in which goes some way to creating that.
 

This is surely a quite major bug, why not patch it?

I think the truth of the situation is that the clients on these forums aren't really the clients that Invision are developing their products for.
I suspect it's mostly (perhaps almost solely) the priorities of and feedback from enterprise clients which is driving their development and future planning. 
I'm sure it's part of the reason why there's a reasonable sub section of those on these forums who clearly feel undervalued right now (along with price hikes, changes to support, long lived bugs, and parts of the software suffering from a lack of attention). It's also the reason why some of the communication from Invision can come across as a bit tone deaf and rile people up at times.
I'm not criticising particularly, as far as I'm concerned it's just the way it is. It's just a case of matching expectations to reality in my mind.

This is surely a quite major bug, why not patch it?