David N.

Thank you @Randy Calvert , modifying the "logo" template worked great. 😀

I would like to add small images to the right of my Site Logo (in order to link to affiliate websites). 

I have tried editing my theme and entering some HTML under the "Header and Footer" tab but that does not allow me to insert the images to the right of the Site Logo (only above it). 

Should I start editing my theme's globalTemplate file?

With the new search filter inside the search box in 4.7 I've noticed that many times I am browsing a topic, then do a search and find nothing, only to later realize that the search box was automatically set to search only that topic. 

I wish that at least there was a link or a button in the search result that said something like "You were searching only that topic. Do you want to extend your search to the entire forum?"

Yes please I would love to test it! Thank you!

Is this something that would be doable by customizing the template file, or is it going to be a complex endeavor? 

I wish a blog like view of category listings would be added to the Articles database in Pages, same as there is currently one for the Articles index page: 

Will do. Thank you Marc. 

Thank you. That's really too bad! 😔

So when using the "Articles" database in pages, I have a choice to display the index page so that it looks more like a blog and less like a forum: 

That's great. 

However if I go to a category, then all articles are shown as one list, more like a forum, and no longer like a blog. 

Is there an easy way to change the view of a category so that it gives me a more of a blog like view just like for the database index? 

Thanks!

I wish there was a better support for using the Tab key to go through the fields of a form. 

For example if I click "Start New Topic" then the focus is not automatically on a specific field so I cannot start typing until I click a field. 

If I click the Title field then I cannot press Tab to go through the body of the post. If the focus is on the body of the post then I cannot Shift-Tab to go back to the Title field (the focus goes back to the browser's URL field instead). 

Thank you. Unfortunately it is already set to truncate it but users reply to the email instead of clicking "Go to Post" so that's not a solution for me. 

Where can I edit the email template? 

I think @SeNioR- meant, did you try to solve hCaptcha?

I did, and it's a bit slow but if it helps with spam I'm willing to give it a try. 

In notifications about a new post in a topic one follows, there's a sample of the text from the new post. Is there a way to remove that sample? 

Unfortunately a lot of users think that the notification email is the answer to their question and they continue the discussion by responding (by email) to the notification email, instead of clicking the "Go to Post" button and posting in the forum. 

1 hour ago, Marc Stridgen said:

I would ask, have you not tries switching to the new hcaptcha we added there? Its more effective

I had not! I just did though, thanks a lot for reminding me. 

Just now, Marc Stridgen said:

If you are testing this repeatedly, it's very likely you will indeed hit spam levels. You should always enter yourself into the whitelist if you are testing registrations.

Thank you. I did not test this repeatedly although I may have submitted the same form twice in rapid succession, would that have triggered the security check fail? Still, maybe the message should then be different because a user is likely to submit the same form twice (the same way I just did) and in that case they don't know what they're supposed to do in order to fix the issue. Maybe it should say "wait a minute then try to submit this form again"? 

Because the way the message is worded here, it seems like you're supposed to try something (to pass the security check) that isn't visible on the page.

Ok so I experienced this myself today while trying to help someone else sign up. The user said they couldn't sign up and received "Error code: 2S129/1" so I decided to try to sign him up myself, and I got that same message ""You did not pass the security check. Please try again." - I waited a couple of seconds, tried to re-submit the form and it worked but said the account required approval. I approved the account and noticed it was spam check level 3, even though the user is legit - not a spammer. 

Some people use imgur to share videos, so it would be good to offer imgur video embeds. Thanks!

49 minutes ago, Marc Stridgen said:

It seems to be an issue with google struggling to parse the json that has actually been posted there

Right - is there any way to avoid this? Or is this a Google bug? 

I provided the URL as a link to "this page" in the first line of my original post. The URL is https://www.logicprohelp.com/forums/topic/144297-an-audio-unit-plug-in-reported-a-problem-which-might-cause-the-system-to-become-unstable-please-quit-and-restart-logic-pro/

I get the following error in Google Search Console regarding this page:

Search Console has identified that your site is affected by 1 Unparsable structured data issue(s). The following issues were found on your site.

Great! Just logged in as a test user account and I see it now. Fantastic. 😀

I just updated to 4.7.2 and I continue seeing the old "Mark as Solution" link, not the new green one? I checked in my dashboard and my install is indeed 4.7.2: 

Alright, thanks a lot. 

1 hour ago, Mark H said:

Please ask that member to try a different browser, or use their usual browser in "Private Mode" so that all browser extensions or plugins are disabled. It's possible the user's browser is blocking the captcha box from displaying.

Does that resolve the issue for that member?

Unfortunately that person (he's not a member) has apparently given up and he isn't responding to my emails. 😔

2 hours ago, Randy Calvert said:

Do you have a captcha enabled?  It sounds like you have something other than just username/password but that additional challenge is not being provided or displayed properly. 

Only the invisible Captcha, and the site and secret key are the same as they used to be. 

1 hour ago, Marc Stridgen said:

Have you since resolved this?

No I haven't changed anything. Only one user reported this issue, I'm not sure if other ones are having it or not.