Jump to content

David N.

Clients
  • Posts

    1,250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Projects

Release Notes v5

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Posts posted by David N.

  1. Has anyone here done a migration from self hosted to Invision Cloud services? 

    The process is:

    1. Take self-hosted site offline.
    2. Make a backup of all files + db and give to Invision. 
    3. Invision recreates the site on the cloud. 
    4. I change my DNS to point to the cloud.
    5. I take the cloud site online.

    My concern is that the entire 5 step process can represent a lot of time offline, which means a loss of ad earnings, and potentially a bad message to Google for search indexing. 

    To avoid this, I am considering turning my self-hosted site back on right after I complete step #2, albeit locking the forum entirely so that new members cannot register, and no one can post new replies, topics or reactions. 

    What do you think? 

  2. Ok so I enabled push notifications on Facebook. I intentionally left a tab open where I had started to type a message. I received a push notification for a private message. When I clicked it, it opened a new tab with Messenger. 

    Then I received a notification pop-up on the Facebook tab where I had started to type the message (bottom left of the screen) that someone had replied to another post. I clicked it and I was prompted to confirm that I wanted to leave the page and lose my unsaved changes, with an offer to keep editing my message instead. 

    In both cases, facebook ensured that I didn't lose any of the data I had started typing. 

    Could contain: Page, Text

  3. This just happened to me again. Here's the scenario: 

    1. I start editing a post and adding a lot of detailed new content.
    2. While editing I need to do some research so I open a new tab, start searching.
    3. I get a notification that another topic had an answer. 
    4. I click the notification and immediately realize that it's about to reload the page where I was editing my post. I frantically try to stop it but it's too late, the page is reloaded before my eyes and all my edits are lost. 🥵
    On 5/12/2022 at 4:27 PM, Marc Stridgen said:

    This is by design

    Why? That design does not make sense to me. 

    I often have a few tabs open with pages on my forum that I'm about to work on, let's say I have 3 topics open that I intend to reply to in the next hour. Now I get a notification that someone replied to a recent topic I was involved in. I wish  clicking it would just open that recent topic in a new tab rather than reloading one of the 3 existing tabs I have for my forum. 

    On 5/12/2022 at 4:47 PM, Mark H said:

    You can also use CMD-click (Mac) or CTRL-click (PC) to open the notification item in a new browser tab. It's what I do, anyway.

    Thank you, that's what I'll do however for our users who may not know this, I really wish clicking a link in a notification would open a new empty tab by default. 

    Also that would make the behavior consistent with clicking a link in a notification email (which does open a new tab as expected). 

     

  4. I wish that tagging other members in a post was quicker, more like on Facebook, where:

    1. I type "@" and a couple of letters,
    2. The suggestion menu pops-up,
    3. I press Enter to confirm the first (or only) suggestion in the menu. 

    The way it works on Invision now: 

    1. I type "@" and a couple of letters,
    2. The suggestion menu pops-up,
    3. I have to press the Down arrow key to select the first (or only) suggestion in the menu,
    4. I press Enter to confirm the first (or only) suggestion in the menu.

    It's not so much that step #3 is very time consuming, it's that most users don't realize they have to do that, being used to tagging members the way Facebook works, and so to them it appears as if the feature is not working properly because when they press Enter, no one is tagged and instead a line break is inserted. 

  5. Here's an email I received from a member. 

    "I had not clicked any button indicating that my question was solved. When following the link in your email, then try to make a new post and put in my email address, your site says that email in use by another user.

    I give up!"

    This is not the first time a member is confused and frustrated by this. Here's what's happening:

    1. A member posts a topic. 
    2. The topic gets a few replies.
    3. The member receives an email notification that prompts him to mark one of the replies as the solution. 
    4. The member wants to reply to the topic. He clicks the button to go to the post.
    5. Being logged out, the member sees the guest posting form:

      Could contain: Page, Text, File, Webpage
       
    6. The member enters their email address in the first field, types a post and clicks Submit Reply.
    7. The members sees "That email address is in use by another member".

      Could contain: Page, Text, File
       
    8. The member is frustrated and confused and gives up.

    I feel like this process should be obvious.

    Now I understand that they should not enter their email, they should log in instead, however that form is encouraging them to enter their email address. I know they should click "sign in" but it's not very obvious that that is a link, nor that that is what they should be doing instead of entering their email address. 

    Or, if that's not possible because of security reasons (divulging the account name associated with an email address), then at least make it very clear what the user should do, something like this: 

    ________

    Do you have an account? Log in now.

    Don't have an account yet? Enter your email address here.

     

  6. 5 hours ago, Randy Calvert said:

    I personally would not expect it to happen anytime soon if at all.  

    Why not? It sounds like the feature wouldn't be very complex to implement and it's how many other platforms work. 

    5 hours ago, Randy Calvert said:

    One idea to consider though...  don't show the full message via email.  If only a part of the message is displayed via email, it forces users back to your site to reply.

    That's already how my forum is set up, and that does not stop people from replying to the email notification. 

    Case #1 short answers. I just received one that said: "Thanks. How is this helpful? I feel like I must be missing something obvious. " — that entire answer fits as a sample so it's shown in the email. 

    Case #2 answers that are shortened with an elipsis added, but it's not clear that the answer the person posted isn't that shortened bit with the elipsis at the end. Something like "there was a case in the early 2000‘s where an iTunes update had a small error in the installer that would completely erase every attached any drive..." — it's not clear that the answer doesn't stop there and that there's more if you click the button. 

    Case #3 short answers that are later edited by the poster. Only the short sample is sent in the notification, and it looks like you are getting the entire answer (no elipsis), but in reality there's more content to be read when you go to the forum.

    Moreover, the button is labeled "Go to this Post", it should be labeled something like "Read the Full Reply" instead. 

    Still hoping for the option to have no sample at all and a simple button "Read the Comment". For me, that would be the absolute best way to handle this.

  7. In our forum we often ask members to upload .zip files to share, however when you do so an alert "The application/zip file format(s) are not supported". I suppose that means the forum doens't know how to do a proper embed of that file (which is fine, not a problem), however the file is still uploaded as expected. But some members are feeling this is an error and that their file didn't upload properly (even though it did). 

    Is there a way to get rid of this alert? 

    Thanks!

    Could contain: Text, Page

×
×
  • Create New...