Yamamura

Ability to split a user's post into two posts.

On 1/4/2022 at 12:03 PM, Marc Stridgen said:

Im not seeing anything incorrect in what you are showing in your image. 

🤦🏻‍♂️

2 hours ago, Marc Stridgen said:

but it seems to have rectified itself as they are showing correctly here

🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

On 11/28/2021 at 1:37 AM, Gregsta said:

looking for some snow for my forum

What for? This is not 2005.

12 minutes ago, Daniel F said:

Works just fine for me as guest.

I have clicked on the link (and also the + button for testing) which resulted in

2 hours ago, KVentz said:

Recently I have found that all quote links (on an arrow in the quote block) return not found

I solved this bug with this css code:

blockquote + .ipsEmbeddedVideo {
    margin-top: var(--sp-4);
}

4 hours ago, Gabriel Torres said:

@Matt

One new suggestion:

Disallow: /discover/content-started/

 

This url is already blocked in the current version robots.txt

28 minutes ago, Square Wheels said:

Why would it list the same topic twice?

Because this stream does not show unread topics, but unread posts.

If you are using a custom style for the editor, then you most likely need to update the icons_hidpi.png and icons.png files. They have a new icon for Stock Replies, which displaced some of the other icons.

No updates so far 🤦🏻‍♂️ This is inconceivable! Users who registered through Steam can no longer log in! Fixes of such critical bugs should be released instantly, within a few days.
And you're still selling an app that doesn't work! 👎🏻

Microsoft just hasn't updated its Emoji font yet. You can use Twitter emoji to show all the images.

18 minutes ago, Miss_B said:

I have to ask out of curiosity, is there any particular reason as to why you want to do that btw?

1 hour ago, Jason Brown_41238 said:

Some of my content is course material and although it's evergreen, the date makes it feel like it's out of date content even though it doesn't change.

1 hour ago, Marc Stridgen said:

That is correct. Could you clarify what you mean when you say "These docs"? We would not actually recommend you wish caching off

57 minutes ago, Jordan Miller said:

One cool thing about asking questions in the forum (generally speaking) is that it's likely going to also help someone in the future.

I see that the debate about a new kind of support is due to differing understandings of this meaning. I agree that "asking questions" is best done on the forum, rather than contacting support in person. BUT I and many others here are talking about a different type of support requests. I contact support when problems arise on the forum (mainly after an update) or I see some bugs, I attach screenshots and screen recordings (which I post to my YouTube account), I provide developers with access to my forum so that they can go in, check and confirm problems. I don’t want to write about this on a public forum, I don’t need a "community support" for these problems (because these problems can ONLY be solved by developers), and maybe I don’t want to show a link to my forum or YouTube account. So yes, I want to be able to address such issues directly to support.

26 minutes ago, Marc Stridgen said:

Those emails created those same topics, just in the ticket system. So your issues will not become any more hidden than they have been. We have the same volume, just in a different location, monitored more effectively. 

Sorry, but "support" from the community on forums is inherent in free software. When a client pays money, he wants to have a private communication with the support (there can be many reasons for this).

3 minutes ago, Marc Stridgen said:

We have thousands of clients

"We have thousands of clients to email." Now these thousands of clients will write not to email, but to the forum, creating thousands of topics.

Sorry, but I think this is an absolutely wrong step in development.

I don’t mind the new prices, but I don’t like the new type of "support" at all 😞

56 minutes ago, Charles said:

We have thousands of clients to email.

"Great". Now my topic with a problem will get lost under thousands of topics with problems from other clients. A very "smart" approach.

7 minutes ago, Phillyman said:

I am not seeing this anywhere, I have hit the check for updates button.

«To apply the patch, please visit support in your Admin CP and select the "Optional Update" item shown»

Jesus, after updating to version 4.6.6 my forum is super fast. Now the pages open instantly. How did you do that? 🤯👍

On 8/29/2021 at 2:10 PM, Marc Stridgen said:

That is indeed how it used to work, however its quite a performance impact unfortunately, so this was changed. 

Why doesn't showing online users affect performance in other forum engines? Enabling caching is not a "problem" solution.
Let the forum administrators decide for themselves what affects performance and what doesn't. The Who's Online block must have a separate caching setting to be able to completely disable caching. My current caching setting is 1 minute, but I still get constant complaints from users that they don't see themselves in this block. With caching enabled, this block is absolutely useless and inconvenient (like the "Recently Browsing" block in topics, which now does not display anyone at all).

16 minutes ago, Charles said:

He literally gives every single hump day topic a different title 🙂 

Yes, but not everyone reads the full topic name or remembers the name of the previous topic. For example, I accidentally noticed that this is a new topic (by the number of replies), at first I thought it was one of the old topics.

PS I would like to create an activity stream with Jordan's new topics so that I can be notified of new "Hump Day" topics, but I am not sure how 😩

@Jordan Invision I think you should give more different names to topics. Or publish all weekly changelogs in one topic. It seems that many users, when they see the words "Hump Day" in the list of topics, think that this is one of the old topics and do not even open it.

@daffyy Can you remove the "Solution" label?

13 hours ago, Hatsu said:

I'm not interested to see who WAS online 15 minutes ago, for example.

This block always showed those who have been online in the last 30 minutes.

The problem is that now this block is cached and depends on the "Cache sidebar, header and footer blocks" setting. Members of my site complain that they do not see themselves in the list of online users. It should take a few minutes before they are displayed in the block. Previously, everything worked fine, but after updating to 4.6, cache problems started. In the latest versions of the engine, the developers made such strong page caching that editing posts using ajax did not even work on my site. I even had to add this code to the globalTemplate, otherwise editing doesn't work and the page was fetched from the cache every time:

<script>      
$.ajaxSetup({
  cache: false
});
</script>