Marc

There isnt at present. The only block we have like this would be the recent events block

I can see later whats setup differently on ours to see if there is anything obvious there. The only thing that stands out in your pictures is I would have selected "S3 compatible". Have you checked your logs, as mentioned above?

I feel you may be misunderstanding my message above. All our cloud environment runs with backblaze

We use this ourselves for everything, so we know backblaze works or all of our cloud environment wouldnt work. The only reason you would get those errors is if permissions are incorrect on your backblaze. Have you checked system logs? In terms of the first one, its worth noting that tasks to move things work with traffic. So no traffic, no movement

Ah. There is indeed no endpoint for that at present. You can see any existing endpoints in v5 in the admin CP in the API section

I've passed this on to a developer to look into

We would not look to ensure compatibility for a new version of PHP until release. While I would expect we will support it, that version has been released for 9 days. 6 of those days have either been weekend or public holiday. I think its safe to say we don't know fully yet 😄

You mean the record image? If so, yes you can upload that

There is no functionality within the software to do this at present.

As mentioned by Matt above, the limited selection is an intentional change within the platform.

Without seeing exactly what your blocks do, its not possible for me to say for certain what you would need to do. What I can say is if it needs javascript only, you could probably do it in template hooks I suspect. If its PHP itself that you need, then you will need to create an application to add those blocks.

You would need to await someone resolving the bug at this point. We're unable to resolve issues on a case by case basis at this point in the beta process

There is no way in which to have a page detached from a page in version 5

As this looks to be something from the support items on commerce, which have been removed, please submit this within the bug report area

Please could you add that to the bug tracker?

There is no guide for setting up steam login with v5 (or v4 either). Im not familiar with steams login methods specifically, but if OAuth 2.0 is supported, you can choose that method within System>Login & Registration>Login Methods, and enter the relevant details

I have to honestly wonder just how much more transparent we can be. We have stated we havent decided which are available at which levels. We have stated that items will not be available on all packages. We have been open about item that we have removed from the product, and even the reasons as to why. I cant figure out what it is that you feel we are not transparent about. We were transparent about the self hosted market reducing in numbers (even to the degree of sharing detail on the market share that entailed). We have changed the pricing structure on that and been transparent about why we changed it, and how it will help keep self hosted going into the future. We're unable to communicate something we havent made a final decision on. This is not to say we dont have thoughts on what will belong in different packages. We do. However we have not finalised those, so it would be inappropriate to state "yes this will be in x package" or "No, this will not be". Again, we have been quite transparent about this.

It would be worth re-reading what you have quoted there. As Matt said, we have not finalised our decisions. Its not possible at all to write which features are available in which packages until we finalise the decisions themselves.

I will not be. As mentioned in the message there, these must be consolidated into a single storage location

This is actually a little misleading. Its that some features are not available on all packages (some wont be available on some cloud levels either). Quite simply, a business decision for some, and technical boundary for others. As with most software however, we sell different packages. The higher your package, the more features you will get. This is certainly not something unusual

If you try this again, do you get the same result? Just trying to determing if this was a one of occurance due to something our end, or software side

Done 🙂

No, that would be fine, as long as the PHP 8.2 version has all the required extensions of course

You would then need to check your error logs to see what that internal server error is

Have you run the upgrader?