Jump to content

Marc

Invision Community Team
  • Posts

    14,940
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    260

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Projects

Release Notes v5

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Marc

  1. Not sure I understand why you wouldnt be able to. After all, it is the solution to your issue
  2. Just taking a look at your settings there, you should switch to hcaptcha which is more effective in combatting spam. You can even adjust this to higher levels once signed up. Also you appear to have no question and answers set up.
  3. OK, we are talking about 2 different things here. If there is "content" which is still visible after ignoring someone, then that would actually be a bug. Please let me know if that is the case with specific examples
  4. We are unable to recreate unfortunately, no. Please check if the user is using VPN or anything like that
  5. I see the difference there. Thank you Nathan, that helped Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! I can confirm this should be further reviewed and I have logged an internal bug report for our development team to investigate and address as necessary, in a future maintenance release.
  6. Ah, have you tried translating them from the stream itself in System->Content Discovery->Streams? I believe thats what the difference is between what Im doing here, and what you are attempting on your end
  7. I have tagged our developers to see if someone can confirm that for you. Im not a developer myself on the platform
  8. If there is an issue on the server, your users will of course also see this. When I refer to caching, I mean caching on your server itself. Please check with your hosting company if you are unsure on this
  9. Do you have any caching running on your server at all? Im not able to replicate this in any way.
  10. Please ensure you are on the latest release of the platform, with all 3rd party items disabled. I have been unable to replicate this unfortunately.
  11. We do indeed support opensearch 2.1 so if you are having issues with that, please let us know and ensure access is up to date
  12. You would need to contact your host in order to obtain this information. If you are using elasticsearch, really you should have a password set for it
  13. Im not following what you mean here. Could you expain further the logic there? Im not sure how moderation would have anything to do with this to be honest. Not unless you have changed the no permission message at all?
  14. If it happens again, please log the detail so we can take a look.
  15. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! I can confirm this should be further reviewed and I have logged an internal bug report for our development team to investigate and address as necessary, in a future maintenance release.
  16. Not without the username and the IP being used at the time, no.
  17. Managing items is no different in v5 than in v4 at present. I would suggest awaiting its beta release and then having a play with it. If you then wish to make suggestions, of course those are always welcomed. However they would need to be specific in nature
  18. Please could you provide more information on what exactly you are deleting? (which member and content)
  19. I would suggest taking a look at our guides on this, and then if you have any specific questions, we can of course answer them. The questions you have currently are quite broad. Start here, which shows how to do subscriptions
  20. Very sorry to hear you arent happen with the currently implementation here. Not all items suggested will be implemented, and while we would like to change every item wished for on version 5, unfortunately this is not really viable to do. So even some items that are planned to be changed, will not nessesarily appear in version 5.0.0. It is worth noting, what you are asking for is actually a new feature, not a change to an existing feature. 'Block' and 'Ignore' arent one and the same. We have an 'ignore' feature, which hides content you may not wish to see from another user. That is very much a functional item, and is well used by our customer. The block feature you are looking for us to implement, simply isnt a feature at present, and I feel the 2 are being confused. They are not the same thing at all. Ignore - I walk into a room, and ignore what a person is saying Block - I walk into a room, and I dont know a person exists, and they dont know I exist.
  21. There will be betas available at some point, but we arent there quite yet 🙂
  22. As mentioned above, there is no way in which to do this currently
  23. This is still an open bug report at present. I will see if we can get an update for you
  24. CKEditor no longer exists in 5, so that will not make it to core 🙂
×
×
  • Create New...