-
Content Count
608 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About rgf100

-
Rank
Community Regular
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
rgf100 started following Topic Summary suggestions
-
I like the new topic summary boxes, but have a few thoughts... "TOP POSTERS IN THIS TOPIC" - it's more likely people will want to read the posts, than the posters' profiles. If there's any way to bring together the posts someone has made (perhaps by minimising other posts?) that would be good, otherwise I'd have that link to the person's first / highest rated post in that topic. The "POPULAR POSTS" bit - I'm not sure how intuitive clicking on the date is. I'd make the post text snippet clickable (and perhaps that whole div, with the userphoto / name also going to the post, although I
-
Make better use of reputation / like information
rgf100 replied to rgf100's topic in Feature Suggestions
The 'popular posts' bit in the new topic summaries are a step in the right direction. But there's so much more that could be done. -
Derzhis reacted to a post in a topic: Make better use of reputation / like information
-
Make better use of reputation / like information
rgf100 replied to rgf100's topic in Feature Suggestions
I'm flogging a dead horse here, but... I still can't filter a post block by number of reactions. -
rgf100 started following Auto Welcome Support, No-code automation with Zapier and Posting flood control delay
-
sobrenome reacted to a comment: No-code automation with Zapier
-
I'm keen to see Zapier available, but I'd imagine it's a pricing thing, as it isn't free at anything but the most basic level. This also makes me wary of using it - if IPB and Zapier can't agree on pricing at some point in the future, what happens to your automation?
-
I actually came looking for it on a per-forum basis - I'd like to keep controversial or contentious topics in a separate forum, where users can only make one or two posts per day. In case you don't know, there is a per-usergroup daily post limit - not quite a flood control, as you could use up your quota all in a few minutes. But it'd help a bit, I'd imagine.
-
sobrenome reacted to a comment: 4.5: Everything else
-
Just to say, I'd *love* to see this based not on days, but on posts.
-
rgf100 started following 4.5: Topic view summary and more and 4.5: Everything else
-
As far as the software goes, this is one of my main concerns currently. Regardless of how genuinely important it is, the fact is that we're mostly getting traffic from Google, Google judges sites by speed, and when I go into Google's Webmaster Tools, I see thousands of pages it regards as too slow.
-
SC36DC reacted to a post in a topic: Make better use of reputation / like information
-
I like this, but having it appear under the first post when not in the sidebar seems a mistake. Fine for a new topic, but once you're past the first page, it's going to get overlooked pretty quickly. I'd say bottom of page, or under the 'target' post - ie, the post that a 'read new' link takes you to. Put it where people will see it.
-
I'd like to have this (and other stats) compiled into weekly emailed reports.
-
Yep, makes a lot of sense.
-
The reactions info is woefully underused in general. I've been banging on about this for some time.
-
Looks like rebuilding the search index fixed it, for anyone having a similar issue.
-
I am, and I'll try that now... Ok, that's reset it to the correct value. Will see if it stays that way as indexing progresses...
-
I'm trying to get an approval queue count on the userbar. Part of this involves the following code: $approvalQueueCount = \IPS\Content\Search\Query::init()->setHiddenFilter( \IPS\Content\Search\Query::HIDDEN_UNAPPROVED )->count(); As I understand it, this should return the number of as-yet unapproved content items and comments. For some reason which I cannot make sense of, this consistently returns a number 2 higher than what's actually in the queue. I went hunting for phantom unapproved content. It's not status updates or replies. It's not blogs, or Pages databases, or galle
-
rgf100 reacted to a post in a topic: Customisable upgrade message for users
-
When upgrading, there's a generic "We're sorry, this web site is unavailable while an update is in progress." message, which is fine. But if, during the update process, we could choose something: "Quick update, should be back by 10pm EST." "Big update in progress, could take a couple of hours." "Updating the site, don't forget to check out our other site othersite.com" That'd be cool.