Jump to content

Marc

Invision Community Team
  • Posts

    14,971
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    262

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Projects

Release Notes v5

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Posts posted by Marc

  1. On 8/3/2024 at 9:48 PM, PinPics said:

     

    I've been playing around with this, but the account is actually banned using the ban button. I reversed the ban and then re-banned the account to see if something just wasn't working. But it still comes up when creating a message:

    Could contain: Text, Person

     

    This is what the account looks like in AdminCP. Is there something there that I'm missing, which could well be the case! We don't have to ban that many, so it's not something I've done a million times. 🙂 

    Could contain: File, Webpage, Text

     

    18 hours ago, teraßyte said:

    My post was split from this topic and acknowledged as a bug:

     

    Indeed that one was confirmed to be a bug 🙂 

  2. I have just taken a look at this, and they are already excluded. This is only if the account is permanently banned. From what you are saying, you are not actually using the ban function, so that would not be excluded.

    The item you are referring to with "Do not allow filtering" is not what you are trying to use it for here. It means the "group" shows up nowhere. It doesnt mean the member doesnt show in places

  3. This is something that has been brought up in the past, but is indeed how the system works at present. We dont have moderation on content edits at present. What you could is to limit the length of time people can edit for, which can somewhat mitigate the issue. I realise thats not exactly what you are after here, but thought I would put it forward as an option

  4. 58 minutes ago, Kjell Iver Johansen said:

    Did you evner get an answer from them about this? Got same email today - I’m on latest version…

    You are responding to something over 4 years old there, but the same answer would apply. You would need to ask for specifics on what they are referring to

  5. 6 hours ago, Cowboy Denny said:

    I am going to guess the production version probably won't be available until december (maybe a christmas gift)?

    It depends on the betas 🙂 May well be before then.

    6 hours ago, Cowboy Denny said:

    Is it safe to assume it will either

    1. install on top of our version 4 (probably disable all the 3rd party plugins until they get patched to support 5)
    2. or is it a migration from 4 to a new fresh install of 5

    You will be able to upgrade

    6 hours ago, Cowboy Denny said:

    Also can you confirm if you will still allow us to have self hosted?  I just can't afford the cloud version

    Yes, version 5 will be available on our classic offering.

    6 hours ago, Cowboy Denny said:

    Last question I have off the cuff is, is it planned that pricing will be the same as what we are paying now or is it planned to increase price.

    There arent any planned. Thats not to say prices will be the same forever, of course lol. But nothing planned at present

    5 hours ago, Cowboy Denny said:

    Also do you know if version 5 will add Dropbox and/or Google Drive support for files?  Amazon S3 bucket is just to darn expensive..   having a large HDD on a VPS is expensive so Dropbox and Google Drive are pretty inexpensive for alot of space so it would be ideal to store files off the server.

    There are no plans for this at present. Feel free to post within our feedback area if you wish to see things like this added in the future. I would think however that dropbox and google drive probably wouldnt be suitable for the file storage side of a site

  6. These were removed in earlier releases for a few reasons, but one of the main ones being they simply dont work in todays community environments. For example, I may have post 1, 2,3. If you cant see post 2, do you have post 1 and 3? If so, what if I dont want you to know that post 2 is hidden? This is just one example

×
×
  • Create New...