Marc

Could you let me know the size and type of file you are uploading, so I can test this end?

This can only really be that the files are different for some reason. Are they perhaps being deleted by something on your server after upload?

I've seen your ticket there and this has been sorted for you 🙂

To clarify here, if its not showing on google test as you are showing there, this isnt something over which we have control. What we do have control over is what is in your sitemap. So if you have items you believe are not being added to your sitemap, we can of course take a look at that for you, but we would need specific examples

There is still an open bug report on this at present, as its not something that is a small fix unfortunately

Sorry to hear you have been having issues. We have now resolved these and sites should be back up and running

Sorry to hear you have been having issues. We have now resolved these and sites should be back up and running

Sorry to see you were having problems. These have indeed now been resolved, and sites should be back to normal

Unfortunately the access details on file are also incorrect, so we are unable to correct this on your behalf. If you can update your access details, we may be able to take a look

Its actually built specifically for the purpose of being to import in quite a generic format, so people can use it to import from different sources. As mentioned above, as long as it contains the require fields, and is in the CSV format, it can be used.

This still still an open item at present. It may well be it requires a larger fix that would come in a larger scale release

We would need to look further into this for you, however the access details on file appear to be incorrect or missing. Could you please update these details by visiting your client area, selecting the relevant purchase, then clicking "Review/Update Access Information" under the "Stored Access Information" section. We look forward to further assisting you.

I understand what you are saying there, but given we cannot replicate it in any way, there has to be some difference in what we are seeing on stock browser installations and what you are seeing there. So we do need to rule these out

I have tagged this for our developers, but as far as the software front end is concerned, there is nothing specifically to set order, even if thats what it happens to have been doing.

Sorry, Im not following here. You mention the order you set in the form, but there is no way in which to set an order

Im not seeing anything broken on your site at present. We would need it to be in the broken state, or the specific things you are adding to put it in the broken state so we can check this

You would need to check what redirects are in place on your server there, as it seems something is redirecting when you visit that location as in the message

Sorry to hear this is the case. I am unable to advise without knowing what you are missing there. There isnt anything you have added to the conversation so far that the system doesn't already do.

Sorry, Im not sure I understand the question there. Without it currently broke or the exact steps to reproduce on your site, there isnt anything for us to look at. Of course you would need to ensure access details are up to date on file

You can read more about this here

No problem at all 🙂

This would be users who can see hidden items, so would be moderator permissions

Also it would be worth checking your spam folder to ensure they arent simply being caught up in there

I can pass this on, but Im not seeing any issues at all at present.

Sorry to hear this is the way you feel. This is unfortunately not a simple case of adding primary keys to each table, and would be an extremely large undertaking on the software. Therefore is not something you are likely to see any time soon. However, I would like to address the below I would suggest on this contacting a developers to work on this on your behalf. The documentation does indeed show the creation of members in the members section of the members section of the rest API here https://invisioncommunity.com/developers/rest-api A POST request would be sent to the following endpoint - /core/members In addition, this returns the ID of the member that has been created. You can pull a full list of members on the REST API if you need to pull those separately with a GET request to the following endpoint /core/members However you do mention the following after that part Getting all IDs and the use of OAuth for creation of members are 2 different things here. In terms of OAuth and your other site being the client, you can create OAuth clients within System->Site Features->API for your purposes, which follow the OAuth 2.0 standard. All scopes are shown in that area that can be used, and again the ID of course would be provided to the client. There isn't anything here at this point that you have said that isn't already available with our APIs. I would encourage you to get someone who is familiar with these, or if its just things you are unsure of, please post in our developers forum to ask those questions.