Jump to content

Dll

Clients
  • Posts

    1,162
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Dll

  1. I'm just telling you what we're seeing. It's different to what you apparently are, but I can categorically tell you that the behaviour on our community when running a rebuild is not at all what you're describing.
  2. We can go round in circles for hours here. But ultimately, if that were the case, every single person registered on our community prior to certain dates would be awarded longevity badges, and that simply isn't the case. We rebuilt just a few days ago, and the only people who have been awarded the badges are those who have logged in enough days after registration for the rules we've set to apply.
  3. Honestly, I don't. It may not be the case on your community, but we have a clear difference in the numbers of people who have been awarded these sort of badges and the numbers of people who have been registered long enough to receive them if it was solely based on the difference between the date of the rebuild and their date of registration.
  4. No, you've misunderstood my meaning. From what I've seen on our community, if someone signs up on September 7th 2010 and never visits again, rebuilding achievements on September 7th 2021 doesn't award them anything. But if they sign up on September 7th 2010, their last visit was on September 7th 2020 and you rebuild on September 7th 2021, then they will be awarded the 10 year badge. As I say, it's based on their last visit, even if that wasn't recent but was > than the number of days after their registration set in the rule.
  5. @iacas - this isn't how the system has behaved on our community. The rebuild appears to look at the last logged in date and gives the badge based on that. What that does do is award people badges for longevity even if they haven't logged in recently, as long as their last login was > the number of days after their registration for the rule that's been set. But that seems reasonable enough to me.
  6. It doesn't work that way. It's based on when the user logs in, so won't award it to someone purely for registering a year ago and not logging in since.
  7. The thing is, unless the image sizes are specified on the page, it doesn't matter which method you use, the page will still jump around as it loads. So, instead of height: auto, as it seems to be at the moment, the height of image thumbnails really should be set to the correct number of pixels.
  8. This is throwing an error for us on 4.6.4 using php 8 (was fine on php 7).
  9. There is one issue with that, in that flagging as a spammer doesn't strip the profile, which quite often gets links, about me's etc added to it by the spammers. Unless this has changed in 4.6?
  10. Dll

    Radical Tags

    Hi, just wondering if this allows you to add tags to topics in bulk at all?
  11. @Fosters - any news on when the 4.6 compatible version is going to be released please?
  12. Any particular reason you bought a new certificate since SSL appears to be included in hosted ips products?
  13. While we're at it, how about bringing back internet explorer 3?
  14. Doubleclick cookies load when you have the advertising features switched on in Google analytics.
  15. I understand this is configurable, but it makes no sense that the default behaviour of the software is to have a different page width for posts within topics based on whether it has less than or greater than 3 pages. Obviously, having a topic summary when there are just a few posts makes little sense, so I get the reasoning but it makes for a very inconsistent ui, which displays a lack of planning or consideration around what is actually best for the user, readability of topics and so on. Has anyone looked into whether having the sidebar or not makes any difference in terms of the readability, the time spent within topics or anything along those lines?
  16. @Fosters - I'd appreciate a reply to this, as I've bought the licence and the settings for it appear to be missing. Is this a bug, or am I missing something?
  17. Now now @SeNioR-. Cursing at ips products. Not cool man.
  18. There are some problems with content flowing outside of margins / the screen on this site at the moment.
  19. I like the irony in the fact that @Jordan Invision seems to definitely be in the more is more camp when it comes to the use of emoji's in his own posts but is firmly in the less is more camp when it comes to controlling the emoji reactions people can give to posts 🙃 Maybe those wanting to express a negative emotion can just make a one emoji post instead, that ought to be conducive to a constructive, easy to follow discussion!
  20. I feel like I'm missing something obvious here, but where are the settings for the application? I can see some in group settings, but how do I switch on simple mode, for instance?
  21. I doubt it, since sending 1000's of extra emails a day is probably a lot more expensive than a few extra columns in the database.
  22. That's flawed though, as someone is very likely to want to be notified when someone mentions them or replies directly to them, they're highly unlikely to want to be notified every time someone likes or reacts to their content. Particularly on a busier forum where there are 100's of reactions to some posts.
  23. No, but it does send a notification of a reaction to a post, which is linked in to selecting you want to be notified of new replies to a topic and there's no method to separate them.
  24. Something has to give with these notifications. Members who want to receive reply notifications are getting literally hundreds of emails a day because a post they make gets a lot of reactions. Ultimately that's making them decide to switch off their email notifications entirely....
×
×
  • Create New...