Jump to content

rubiksw

Members
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Agree
    rubiksw got a reaction from Clover13 in Automatically resize / optimize images   
    Automatically resize / optimize images served to the client to improve page speed. Convert images / gifs to most efficient format. This should be a core feature if it's not already. 
    Nginx offers a module called "image_filter" which would accomplish this, but having it added as a core feature if IPB would be much easier!
  2. Thanks
    rubiksw reacted to CoffeeCake in Error help - "You are not allowed to use that display name"   
    There are two places to look:
    ACP > Members > Member Settings > Ban Settings
    What do you have in the non-registerable names tab?
     
    And:
    What do you have in ACP > Members > Member Settings > Profiles > Profile Settings under allowed characters in display names?
     
     
  3. Like
    rubiksw reacted to Mark in Date and Time formatting   
    {datetime="whatever" dateonly="true"}  
  4. Agree
    rubiksw reacted to brfcs in Reaction / Reputation permissions at the user level   
    I was searching the community to see if this was possible, we have a few bad actors that try and bully other users by downvoting everything they write and at the moment we've had to switch off reactions apart from the up vote.
    Being able to restrict usage of the reactions by group would be a great addition.
  5. Agree
    rubiksw got a reaction from SeNioR- in Reaction / Reputation permissions at the user level   
    Reaction permission at the user level should be a thing. I'm sure many of you are aware of "rep bombing", or the act of mass reacting to someone's content with the sole intention of hurting their credibility or personal growth within the community. Reactions & Reputation is a great way for users to express themselves. Removing it entirely or not allowing "negative reactions" due to a few bad actors is not an ideal solution. We should be able to restrict bad actors from using the Reaction / Reputation system at the user level.  
  6. Agree
    rubiksw got a reaction from HappyNewUser in Automatically resize / optimize images   
    Automatically resize / optimize images served to the client to improve page speed. Convert images / gifs to most efficient format. This should be a core feature if it's not already. 
    Nginx offers a module called "image_filter" which would accomplish this, but having it added as a core feature if IPB would be much easier!
  7. Like
    rubiksw got a reaction from Grafidea in Automatically resize / optimize images   
    Automatically resize / optimize images served to the client to improve page speed. Convert images / gifs to most efficient format. This should be a core feature if it's not already. 
    Nginx offers a module called "image_filter" which would accomplish this, but having it added as a core feature if IPB would be much easier!
  8. Like
    rubiksw got a reaction from Ibai in Automatically resize / optimize images   
    Automatically resize / optimize images served to the client to improve page speed. Convert images / gifs to most efficient format. This should be a core feature if it's not already. 
    Nginx offers a module called "image_filter" which would accomplish this, but having it added as a core feature if IPB would be much easier!
  9. Agree
    rubiksw got a reaction from LaCollision in Reaction / Reputation permissions at the user level   
    Reaction permission at the user level should be a thing. I'm sure many of you are aware of "rep bombing", or the act of mass reacting to someone's content with the sole intention of hurting their credibility or personal growth within the community. Reactions & Reputation is a great way for users to express themselves. Removing it entirely or not allowing "negative reactions" due to a few bad actors is not an ideal solution. We should be able to restrict bad actors from using the Reaction / Reputation system at the user level.  
  10. Agree
    rubiksw got a reaction from OptimusBain in Reaction / Reputation permissions at the user level   
    Reaction permission at the user level should be a thing. I'm sure many of you are aware of "rep bombing", or the act of mass reacting to someone's content with the sole intention of hurting their credibility or personal growth within the community. Reactions & Reputation is a great way for users to express themselves. Removing it entirely or not allowing "negative reactions" due to a few bad actors is not an ideal solution. We should be able to restrict bad actors from using the Reaction / Reputation system at the user level.  
  11. Like
    rubiksw reacted to Miss_B in [Mad] Multiple Accounts Detector   
    It is available only in the Acp currently. 
  12. Thanks
    rubiksw reacted to TAMAN in Gamozilla Theme [ support topic ]   
    Its within the default IPS 4.5 settings
  13. Like
    rubiksw got a reaction from BouncingXkala in Brilliant Discord Integration   
    Yes, how to disable logging in with Discord. 
  14. Like
    rubiksw reacted to BouncingXkala in Brilliant Discord Integration   
    @SoftwareFactorydo you know how I can hide the "Login with Discord"? I want to remove this.
  15. Like
    rubiksw got a reaction from Andrey777 in Template System   
    Is there a live demo of this yet?
  16. Like
    rubiksw got a reaction from Morrigan in How to show featured posts to all?   
    Thank you Morrigan & VaBeach_Guy, both are great suggestions but Morrigan's instruction is exactly what I was looking to do! 
  17. Thanks
    rubiksw reacted to Morrigan in How to show featured posts to all?   
    No, but you can use announcements:
    ModCP > Announcements
    OR
    Create > Announcement
    You can display it in a specific forum instead of all forums.
  18. Like
    rubiksw reacted to VaBeach_Guy in How to show featured posts to all?   
    Not sure if this would meet your wants, but what if you made a specific forum that can only be seen by mods/admins and banned members? The banned members would only see that forum and regular members can't see it. 
    Banned members have the ability to post in that forum, but you have the banned group set to approve all posts. That way, they can post, but no other banned members can see their post but mods/admins can. 
    Or some form of that idea.
    You just have to make sure that you have all of your forum/banned member permissions set correctly. 
  19. Like
    rubiksw got a reaction from SC36DC in Template System   
    Is there a live demo of this yet?
  20. Like
    rubiksw got a reaction from bfarber in (Solved) Replies Missing   
    Issue resolved! Since this is a private development build and the background tasks were only set to run when users were online and doing stuff, I had to run the tasks manually. 
    I did so by going to Dashboard in ACP and scrolling down a bit to “background tasks” and running them all manually. Cron job would be better for more advanced users but this worked for me. 

    Thank you for the info! 
  21. Thanks
    rubiksw reacted to bfarber in (Solved) Replies Missing   
    Background tasks are kicked off when the conversion completes and will be displayed on the dashboard in the AdminCP. Those issues will be fixed when the appropriate background tasks run to rebuild the counts. Basically you just need to give it a little time.
    If you aren't running your tasks via cron, we would recommend doing so as it will allow those tasks to run quicker. You can use the AdminCP live search to look for "cron" to find the option.
×
×
  • Create New...