Martin A.

If you want to add support for it, the repo is accepting pull requests. https://github.com/MartinAronsen/membermap

@Square Wheels and @liquidfractal the issue should be fixed now in 3.1.7

Sorry for the delay guys. I believe I have found the issue with the task. If there were 0 locations found in the current batch it was processing, the task would turn itself off, as well as turn the "Import markers" setting off. I have changed this now to not turn it off until all members have been processed. After updating, go into Member Map settings and re-enable the import option, then run the task manually, and report back what you got back from it. It should now say "Synchronised X out of Y member locations", where Y should be a much greater number than what you had in the past. If should also keep going even if X is 0, as long as Y is greater than 0.
 
Did you select a result in the dropdown first? Behind the scenes there are hidden input field for the coordinates, and those aren't populated until you select an item in the autocomplete result.
 
For those having issues with the queue, where it kept on running; I haven't been able to reproduce this error myself. This queue isn't intended to be used before you have close to 4000 markers, as that's when I started getting "out of memory" issues. I have now hardcoded this to not run at all if you have less than 1000 markers. There is a calculation done when deciding to use the queue or do it instantly ( Total memory limit - Memory already used < ( Total markers * 0.01(MB) ) + 10MB ). If the amount of memory we assume we're going to use is greater than what we have left, the queue is used. These numbers may not have been available on shared hosting or CIC, and that might be the reason why a member with less than 50 markers is set to use the queue.
 
I'll push the update to the marketplace in a bit, but I'll wait a few days before I trigger the ACP update notification.

And indeed it does :) Thank you!

Martin,
Thanks very much for the quick fix!
John

Not happy.  
That summarizes my feelings on clubs.  I investigated clubs three times in the past and last night I officially converted my group from Group Collaboration over to IP.Clubs, and I'm still deeply unhappy.  I feel like I went from driving a top-of-the-line Mercedes to a Kia.  The only thing going for the Kia is that it's company-insured to always be supported.  
This is an incredibly sensitive topic to me, because the reputation and features of my community are now critiqued by a third-party Club Leader who has entrusted me to move his 12-year group over to my community.  
I don't even know where to begin:
No homepage - Your dinky little text box doesn't cut it.  My Club Leader understands the concept of a homepage, wants a homepage, and deserves a homepage.  A homepage with full ckeditor capabilities with image attachments, bold, colors and all the other wild and outrageous formatting that he wants.  He wants it more than an Activity Stream, which we can't customize anyways. Follow - no club-wide follow.  These external members have no bloody clue what your features are, and asking them to follow each node is ridiculous.  Getting them through a two-step process to register on my community and then join the club is already a huge ask.  But once they join the club, they don't get notified on any of the content even though that's the whole reason why they joined.  Once a member joins a club, they should auto-follow the club.   Members No custom moderator permissions.  I have no idea what moderator permissions were just given to the moderator.    No member outreach.  How does my club owner actually message or mail his members to market outside of his club?   Nodes - no reordering, which means you're screwed on ordering. Nodes - no categories within nodes, which is a major pain point for me.  I had to convince my Club Leader to reduce 70+ categories into 3.   He had detailed categories for each letter of the album A-Z, and now all albums are mixed together in 39 pages of albums.  Content is king, and the inability to organize and categorize within nodes is a huge pain point.   Conversion - no conversion of existing nodes.  I have no idea how IPS expected me to manually move 49,700 content items into clubs.  Content is king, and clubs is not easy to transfer content in / out.   Delete and Move/Delete - In the ACP > Community app nodes, club nodes are not an option when using Delete or Move / Delete.  Node Settings - I, as root admin, don't have full node control over settings or permissions.  For example, in galleries I can't enable "only use albums".  I have no idea how or where these nodes are inheriting certain settings that are beyond even my control as a root admin, and that's a big problem.   I am asking a Club Leader to trust me to move his content, his members, and his loyalty over to me, yet these are the real challenges that I'm facing: his members aren't notified of new content; his members can't find content in 39 pages of albums; and his moderator and members can do whatever with whatever permissions they want because I can't control user, moderator, or node permissions.
Joel

Add the following to your custom.css
body[data-pageapp="membermap"] .leaflet-top.leaflet-right { display: none; }  

Hi Martin,
The 3.5.2 Membermap Zip will not open on Windows 10.

Thanks very much...
 

Thank you 🙂

Because their Nominatim policy does not allow the kind of usage Member Map require. And when I initially developed this 3 years ago, I used a different API endpoint at MapQuest. If I remember correctly, there was also a difference in the results from OSM Nominatim and MapQuest Nominatim, where the latter was far better at getting addresses. This may of course have changed over the years.
https://operations.osmfoundation.org/policies/nominatim/
And they're not happy about automated bulk requests, which the profile sync feature would violate.
 

Maybe something obvious, but is it possible to remove the member map from newly created clubs? Can't find such a setting anywhere. 
Oops. Found it! Member Maps Settings -> Clubs extension. Sorry ?

Google Maps is not used at all in this app.

Update: It seems now to work for guests too! Maybe some strange caching problem.. the membermap update fixed it, thanks @Martin A.

hi @Martin A. Thanks a lot for this amazing app and made it free for everybody, i really appreciate this :)
Thanks again 

Thanks @Martin A.

Anyone else affected, make sure you rebuild your sitemap after running this query.

Yes, it is.
UPDATE membermap_markers SET marker_last_comment=marker_added WHERE marker_last_comment < 1 OR marker_last_comment IS NULL  

To what purpose?  I can understand why Google Maps does it when the map is embedded, as it is then often surrounded by text. There is a plugin for the mapping library that forces you to click on the map or hover over a area to activate the map. See example here: http://cliffcloud.github.io/Leaflet.Sleep/#summary
Thanks. Fixed today with 3.5.1.

Right, and that's why your cache is constantly building. Disable the sync option. I guess it keeps updating existing markers, and that re-pushes it to the search index and forces a cache rebuild.

Never mind, figured it out. 

Is it still doing this? You think I could get ACP access to your site? 
Yes, I never said you couldn't. But I never said when. So, When It's Ready™

I'll do a compatibility release once 4.3 has its final release, then the feature update will follow after that. I have no timeline at the moment.

Yes, there is an issue with IE11 not supporting newer coding standards. I'm gonna push out a version for this fix now, and move all new features to the IPS 4.3 version.

Yes, there is an issue with IE11 not supporting newer coding standards. I'm gonna push out a version for this fix now, and move all new features to the IPS 4.3 version.

You just pull the location details from your own tables in the getLocations() method in the extension.

This should be added by @Adriano Faria in the Links app, not by me.
No, you can only use icons available through FontAwesome.
1. Do you also want this to update a marker? Do you have an API for this?
2. Which address field?
3. Where?
4. No. I'm not going to replace the suite's usage of Google Maps.
5. Resize what?
6. Didn't understand this.
7. Added to the list
8. You mean the location details shown in the marker popup and in the marker detail page?
9. I'll look into this
10. From where?
I know I've looked into this in the past, but I don't remember why it wasn't doable. Do you know how this app stores the information?