Jump to content

Morrigan

Clients
  • Posts

    6,261
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Morrigan

  1. Which would still require a ticket for the team to investigate the bug.
  2. Possibly, as I said in my previous post that only specific types of fields are filterable.
  3. The problem Brandon, is what they want to do is implement Adsense code periodically in their articles so something like: Their preferred solution is already using a widget (aka Pages block) to perform this task by being able to utilize them in an editor by just adding {block='myadvert'} which is not possible and with the deprecation of BBCode I doubt will be possible.
  4. Add the ability to "Filter by this field" at the field level: This only works for specific types of fields like select and checkbox fields.
  5. From your steps you are saying that they are completing registration. So you will need to lodge a ticket with IPS as it doesn't sound like the registration is toggling the correct view settings. You should NOT be able to see it until they are fully registered though.
  6. Change it back and edit this setting in the actual field section: Its in "Display Options" at the bottom.
  7. So the second screenshot is the "Comments" section. The Comments section does NOT have custom fields. The only time they would see the fields is if they were editing a record (the top section) per the way your permissions are setup. If they had add record they would see it when they create a new record as well. There are no custom fields for comments.
  8. I would need to see screen shots for all of the permissions and the custom fields setup to even begin to guess.
  9. Talk about a necro bump. “7 years later....” there is no choice in the parent thread because it merges the threads chronologically. The parent thread is the thread that was created first.
  10. Moving your admin directory, htaccess and removing the link from your theme are archaic and proven to be meh in this day and age. Google Auth 2FA is enough to secure your account. The person would actually need access to your google auth account, password and backup password to even begin to login to your ACP. Hiding an ACP is at best a "deterrent" and never a real solution. Additionally, the ACP link is ONLY given to those that have an administrative level account (so they have an account that can access the ACP. I'll be honest, if 2FA isn't enough for you, then you are really going outside of the box. Who is in your personal data far enough that you are worried that 2FA isn't enough? It sounds like you're going through extreme measures to solve an already solved problem.
  11. @kmk Permissions are a block level item. Most of them will honor permissions and only show them (at least by default) things they have access to. You can also choose to not honor permissions, this is a great way to attract members to sections that they can gain access to by subscribing etc.
  12. There is no way to limit how much they can hide/delete. Its all or nothing.
  13. The answer is not at this time. Last I remember you may be able to do it with a custom query but the reason its no longer available is because its resource intensive on large databases.
  14. .cAuthorPane_mobile .ipsRepBadge { display: none; } Add it to your custom.css and it should disappear it on mobile.
  15. Pages > Templates > And from here it depends.....
  16. Tags are a means for people to search for things that use the same tag. Think of them a little like hashtags. Yes of course easy peasy CSS if you would like I'll post it.
  17. Clear your site cache. Support > Something isn't working correctly This should resolve your issue.
  18. Well, your guess is as good as ours because that's not in the default theme that I can think of. Can you give a more broad screenshot of the location of this anomaly?
  19. Ah, yeah. You'd have to do that. Still doable.
  20. You'd have to do like an SQL replace to remove empty paragraph tags.
  21. You wouldn't be able to without an SQL query. You also really wouldn't be "hiding" them with the block route though. If you deleted the block so it had nothing to reference you'd be changing an advertisement for {block='my_ad_block'} references. But I'm not sure that's how IPS would implement something like this anyways. Most likely they would convert the "block" code to the HTML that was in the block and save it (similarly to how BBCode, which is now deprecated) is/was handled so you'd be in the same predicament in either scenario.
  22. I don't think I understand then. If you're inserting a block of code.... you use the button. So if I wanted to insert: <script src='https://mygoogleadsense.script/magically.add.this.thing'></script> It will do it. All you have to do is put the code that you would currently have in your block into the HTML portion of the button which is essentially what the block is doing anyways, isn't it?
×
×
  • Create New...