chilihead

Returning to the result you left off at after you have loaded activity and clicked to read.

Oh yeah. I was looking into adding it myself as well but integration for people that aren't as savvy would be good.

I recommended it too a while ago. Makes perfect sense to support these Twitter meta tags along with the ones Facebook looks for. Tweets with images are so much more likely to get clicks than just plain links. 
If you can’t wait: it’s surprisingly simple to add it to certain templates. For example, I added this to my video database in Pages:
{{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:card'] = 'summary_large_image';}} {{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:site'] = '@TypographyGuru';}} {{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:title'] = $record->_title;}} {{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:description'] = 'Watch this video in the collection of the best typography videos on Typography.Guru';}} {{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:image'] = (string) \IPS\File::get( 'cms_Records', $record->record_image )->url;}}  

So this is something newish and I know that there is the twitter integration so this could be an awesome addition. This may not work "with" the integration but it would be a good SEO thing to allow for people to set it up.
https://dev.twitter.com/cards/overview
Just a thought.

One thing that I thought was a very powerful feature of Coppermine Photo Gallery was the concept of "virtual images," where an image would be uploaded to ONE album, but could appear in MULTIPLE albums as filtered by tags.  This provides a much more powerful and dynamic framework for creating cross-over albums.  The classic example is a gallery on zoos ... you can create albums for zoo locations (Wellington Zoo, Toronto Zoo, San Diego Zoo) and by zoo animals (African elephants, pygmy hippo, etc.)
I like your idea though, which is to take the idea one step further for the entire suite.  

I wish that that it was possible to assign multiple categories to items.  This includes photos uploaded to a gallery, pages database items, and file downloads.  This would be similar to the way members can be parts of separate groups.  
What's the benefit of allowing assignment of material to multiple categories?  I will use examples from my aviation related community.
Gallery - Someone uploads a picture that is a beautiful aerial shot of his Grob motorglider.  He'd like to have it listed in his album, Grob gallery, and aerial photography gallery.  To do that now, he'd have to upload it 3 times.
Pages & Files Database -- We have articles stored in a wiki format.  Someone posts an article about slow flight.  He'd like to have it listed in the safety and the training category.  He could upload it twice, but if someone corrects one copy or adds material to it, they diverge.
I think it would make the software more flexible and powerful.
Thanks for building a great tool.

I thought when I added the activity stream my members wouldn't like it at all and complain about it. Like you, I have had no questions, complaints or problems with it what so ever.

When I first saw Activity Stream here, I was thinking like "Oh God whyyyy?". I believed my members will never be OK with it. At first I was against it myself. My members are from 16 - 70 y.o but most active users are mid 30's so I was ready for a battle. But... What turned out - they haven't had any questions or problems with it. Not any! I was like... "It has to be a conspiracy or something". Now I'm used to it myself.

Would love.

bumping this!  Would be useful for my forum also
 

Hi
I saw many topics asking for a job board for Invision
Is there a job boad app or plugin ?
Tx a lot as this would be a great addon to Invision

I'm not sure why it's not recommended on install. They way it's described is as if it's somthing you don't need. They don't even mention emojis.

I'm not sure why it's not recommended on install. They way it's described is as if it's somthing you don't need. They don't even mention emojis.

I'm not sure why it's not recommended on install. They way it's described is as if it's somthing you don't need. They don't even mention emojis.

1. When you search multiple tags there is no way to do an exact search like with the words setting.
If I search the tags: BBQ, Chicken, Recipe I get results with 1 of those tags, 2, or 3. Can we please get a setting to do an exact search of tags, for sites that used closed tags this is really important, as members can really pinpoint what they are looking for when you have a lot of tags dealing with the subjects of your site. Important for open tags as well.
Perhaps this setting can also work for tags and you can include it in the wording. Would probably need to be a separate setting though since you may add words to your search but want exact tags and not exact words or vice versa.

In that example I get results with the tags:
pages
suite
pages, suite
And I want:
pages, suite
2. Also, when you search on mobile tags are not shown in search results like on full. This is another issue because users may want to click tags from results. This becomes more of an issue when searching multiple tags, as you can't see which is tagged which. If I search 5 tags I want to see what is tagged with each, or if I go a word seach I want to see the tags and be able to click, like on full. Maybe for actual tag search code it so they show only if more than one tag is searched. It can be redundant in a single tag search. That could be cleaner looking and function better for both full and mobile. I realize tags are shown in non-tag searches so maybe that does not need to be different, but showing is important, so simple suggestion is, please show on mobile.
3. Last one and related, if using closed tags, can the tag search field either work as selecting tags, or maybe the tag does not turn blue if it does not exist? This would prevent erroneous searches at least, but selecting would show them the tags your site uses, like when composting a post. Maybe even an auto-complete for closed tags. Would that work?
Thanks

I was fine until you went and brought it up.
Nah, it's fine. IPS is of course free to do as they'd like. As long as they do it well. I'd be happy deprecating my app entirely if it's no longer necessary.

Somewhere in the world @Ryan H. feels a chill come over him...

That sounds good @Lindy, thanks.
One more that is a bit of a hindrance, do you think it will take care of this? I want to do an "and" search not "or". Let's say I want to see all that is planned (tag) with search term "gallery". Then you'd bring up only content tagged "planned" with gallery in the post text/title. Right now, it is an "or" search, which is confusing because it is just a combined search of results, so you get a general gallery search, which has all kinds of tags, and a separate "Planned" tag search, combined. As of now it's better to just use tag search and no term as it's a mess of results.
Should I suggest this separately, or will the overhaul take care of, maybe a setting? I could see wanting "or" but "and" is needed and should be default imo. Thanks!

 

Marking not planned because an overhaul of the tag system will likely address much of this. 

1. When you search multiple tags there is no way to do an exact search like with the words setting.
If I search the tags: BBQ, Chicken, Recipe I get results with 1 of those tags, 2, or 3. Can we please get a setting to do an exact search of tags, for sites that used closed tags this is really important, as members can really pinpoint what they are looking for when you have a lot of tags dealing with the subjects of your site. Important for open tags as well.
Perhaps this setting can also work for tags and you can include it in the wording. Would probably need to be a separate setting though since you may add words to your search but want exact tags and not exact words or vice versa.

In that example I get results with the tags:
pages
suite
pages, suite
And I want:
pages, suite
2. Also, when you search on mobile tags are not shown in search results like on full. This is another issue because users may want to click tags from results. This becomes more of an issue when searching multiple tags, as you can't see which is tagged which. If I search 5 tags I want to see what is tagged with each, or if I go a word seach I want to see the tags and be able to click, like on full. Maybe for actual tag search code it so they show only if more than one tag is searched. It can be redundant in a single tag search. That could be cleaner looking and function better for both full and mobile. I realize tags are shown in non-tag searches so maybe that does not need to be different, but showing is important, so simple suggestion is, please show on mobile.
3. Last one and related, if using closed tags, can the tag search field either work as selecting tags, or maybe the tag does not turn blue if it does not exist? This would prevent erroneous searches at least, but selecting would show them the tags your site uses, like when composting a post. Maybe even an auto-complete for closed tags. Would that work?
Thanks

Yes.

I pinned 1st post

This post shows once
Not only page 16. Every page.
No. You'll see 1 pinned post at the top
 

Hello,
1 pinned post.
See 3d screenshot. First post on first page.

Yes. When you created topic first post will be pinned automatically. You do not have to do it manually
Yes.

Yes, it will work.

Does this work with Adv Tags and Prefix? I use that in my sales forum and have a prefix that is SOLD. I'd like the topic to close if the prefix is changed to that.
 

This is a support topic for plugin