Axel Wers

If you need to mass move albums from one category to another, you can click the dropdown arrow next to a category and choose to "Move/Delete Content".

OK, maybe is little soon, but I heard something that new features will be included in 3.1.0 version.

My first suggestion:




This could by unavailable to guests. They really do not need to know what are regular members doing on board and we save some queries.

I'll look into it, one thing I'll need to look at is the resources that would be used to parse each description

OK, maybe is little soon, but I heard something that new features will be included in 3.1.0 version.

My first suggestion:




This could by unavailable to guests. They really do not need to know what are regular members doing on board and we save some queries.

Changelog from 1.0.0 Beta 1 to 1.0.0 RC 1:

IP.Board 3.0.4 (or above) is now required instead of 3.0.2 due to some new functions being available only from this version Added back the functionality to see the number of unread tickets (can be disabled by disabling the hook) New setting to update with ajax the unread tickets count only to members of the staff rather than everyone Added a new option to let members in certain groups start a ticket as another member (doesn't apply to edits or replies) Added back the conversion script from the old "Help Desk" modification Added all the error codes missing Fixed some errors for mysql running in STRICT mode Fixed all the other reported bugs in the bug tracker Other minor enhancements


Originally I planned to add more things and release a Beta 2 but since IPB 3.1 is already at a beta stage I want to get this version stable as soon as possible and then I'll see to add some more features in the new one using some new things available in 3.1 only.

OK, maybe is little soon, but I heard something that new features will be included in 3.1.0 version.

My first suggestion:




This could by unavailable to guests. They really do not need to know what are regular members doing on board and we save some queries.

OK, maybe is little soon, but I heard something that new features will be included in 3.1.0 version.

My first suggestion:




This could by unavailable to guests. They really do not need to know what are regular members doing on board and we save some queries.

Another suggestion:

Spam User

Now when is someone marked as Spam User, there are possibilities:



Do nothing Disable Post/PM permission Disable Post/PM and unapprove posts Unapprove posts, empty profile and ban account

Well, there could be another option (move to specified group). Although last option (... ban account) is good possibility but I want to exclude those users from Members group. When I send bulk mail to Members I don't want to send mail to Spammers. They are banned but still in Members group.

OK, maybe is little soon, but I heard something that new features will be included in 3.1.0 version.

My first suggestion:




This could by unavailable to guests. They really do not need to know what are regular members doing on board and we save some queries.

OK, maybe is little soon, but I heard something that new features will be included in 3.1.0 version.

My first suggestion:




This could by unavailable to guests. They really do not need to know what are regular members doing on board and we save some queries.

Hello agaion IPS crew. I am just wondering what your thoughts on a Related topics for the next releae of IPB. Related topics are a good way for members to see if there are any topices relationg or any topices that might peak their intrests into posting to. This feature would be part of the Topic View.

I have also thought of Socual groups. this owuld be a way for members to create their own groups to talk about certin topics that would be something spsific.

Reputation needs some improvements.

First:

Members A can not gives more than X (X for example 3) plus or minus reputation points to the member B.

For example:

Member A likes Members B and gives him/her plus for EVERY post.

Member C hates Members D and gives him/her minus for EVERY post.

Solution: Members A can gives 3 points (for 3 different posts) to Members B but then he/she must gives points to X (X for example 2) other members.


Second:

Exclude or include categories where Reputation can be used. For example I need to exclude Test category. Every post which was send to this category should be reputated. It's silly.



Please include these two features to 3.0.5

Lot of my members sent me those two suggestions.

Probably security hole in custom skin. I am not sure.

Probably security hole in custom skin. I am not sure.

Probably security hole in custom skin. I am not sure.

It is actually feasible. IPS might have added a security check into some random form's template in a new release, and the custom skin failed to include that, thus opening a hole for some type of injection or other malicious activity.

Things don't work that way.

Probably security hole in custom skin. I am not sure.

Yeah, I like it. Just changed it now for 3.0.4

The dropdown that lets you choose a time period will return in 3.0.2 :)

Reputation very needs two another settings:

Example: my member started topic in test category and she got four negative points (it was joke from other members). Her reputation is now affected, she has -4 for topic in test category! I deleted topic but her reputation is still -4. There is little flame war about this on my board, I had to disable negative points for now.
[*]If "reputated" posts are deleted, reputation should be updated: YES/NO [*]Select category where members are unable to use reputation

I wonder why these features weren't added SO FAR:


possibility reset/restart polls possibility lock polls but continue in topic

I wonder why these features weren't added SO FAR:


possibility reset/restart polls possibility lock polls but continue in topic

I've been talking about this since the first day of IP3 previews in 2008. My hunch is now supported by feedback from my membership.

View New Posts and Today's Active Posts.

View New Content is a step down from View New Posts. Not sure what prompted it but it makes no sense. People want to follow their own threads through that feature. Was it that difficult to keep their own read posts in it? I'm trying to understand the logic for making that change.

Both of the above also need reference to the original posters in threads.

Without reverting back to those features it doesn't matter how much better the rest of the board is. They immediately detract from what should be a huge leap forward.

OK, maybe is little soon, but I heard something that new features will be included in 3.1.0 version.

My first suggestion:




This could by unavailable to guests. They really do not need to know what are regular members doing on board and we save some queries.