jair101

@Fosters, I would also like to request access to the 4.5 version. Thanks.

Not sure if discussed above, but I am getting this error shown instead of one of my forum categories:

[[Template forums/front/index/forumRow is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

With radical tags disabled there are no problems. 

Also, with AT&P one of the features was the ability to click on prefix and show all topics that are using this prefix. Is this available or there is another issue on my test install'?

Just now, Stuart Silvester said:

You'll need to submit a ticket for assistance.

OK, its a test install, so not a big deal overall, but I will pay more attention when updating my production environment. Probably its a wise to put a big fat warning that this is one time only 🙂

Is it possible to rerun the marketplace setup? I thought that one of my apps was purchased outside of the marketplace on the developer website and marked it accordingly, turned out that wasn't the case and I do have a valid purchase here. 

So I want to re-run the initial marketplace setup wizard and mark this application correctly, is that possible or it is one shot only?

I assume it has to do with a question asked during the upgrade. Followers and followed content takes a lot of db space, so the question was whether you want to prune some of the data based on IPS defaults or you want to set the settings yourself. I assume you clicked through to do it the IPS way.

If it is any consolation, the removed followers were probably inactive for very long on your board.

I have AT&P and going 4.5 I will definitely have to convert. What is the recommended way to do it:

Install radical tags on 4.4, convert there, then upgrade to 4.5 or
upgrade to 4.5, install radical tags and convert after that

Is one better than the other?

Does it work only for files, not possible for subscriptions and regular products?

Toxic, definitely.

In its current state I will never enable Leaderboard. It is essentially a battle for likes, which is not how quality content should be measured and all members will be put off by the fact that a long well thought posts have less value then a funny meme. By enabling it, you kinda put an official sticker that likes are all that matters for your community, which will be off-putting for the members who are not part of the chit-chat/spam group. 

I can never figure out why IPS went to the length of developing this feature and just left it there without improvements in the last few version iterations. It has a lot of promise as groundwork layer for a comprehensive gamification solution, but leaving it in its current state it is nothing more then a glorified like counter and does way more harm then good. 

One of the new features I am most excited about is the ability to attach free stock images to the post. It took me a while to find that this is buried deep in "Other Media->Insert a stock photo". There is absolutely no way I can communicate that properly to my members and you know the saying (rephrasing/butchering it probably): "If you need to explain your user interface, you have a bad user interface".

For all years since 4.x is live I never ever looked and used this menu and I believe neither most of my members. Can the options be spread throughout the upload bar instead:

Yeap, it was Commerce related. I had booking.com in one of the descriptions of a premium subscriptions I sell. I removed it from there, the search was fixed after that. Sorry for wasting your time.

Nope, not enabled. 

Hm, it actually points to something related to Commerce...

#0 ./mysite.com/public/applications/nexus/sources/Package/Package.php(531): IPS\nexus\_Package::priceFromData(12, Array, NULL, Object(IPS\nexus\Customer), 'BGN', false, false, false)
#1 ./mysite.com/public/applications/nexus/sources/Package/Item.php(504): IPS\nexus\_Package::lowestPriceFromData(Object(IPS\nexus\Customer), 'BGN', 12, Array, NULL, Array, -1, NULL, false, NULL)
#2 ./mysite.com/public/system/Content/Content.php(1616): IPS\nexus\Package\_Item::searchResultSnippet(Array, Array, Array, NULL, Array, NULL, 'expanded')
#3 ./mysite.com/public/applications/nexus/sources/Package/Item.php(440): IPS\_Content::searchResult(Array, Array, Array, NULL, Array, NULL, false, 'expanded', false, false, NULL, Array)
#4 ./mysite.com/public/system/Content/Search/Result/Content.php(94): IPS\nexus\Package\_Item::searchResult(Array, Array, Array, NULL, Array, NULL, false, 'expanded', false, false, NULL, Array)
#5 ./mysite.com/public/system/Theme/Theme.php(847) : eval()'d code(2845): IPS\Content\Search\Result\_Content->html()
#6 ./mysite.com/public/system/Theme/SandboxedTemplate.php(61): IPS\Theme\class_core_front_search->resultStream(Object(IPS\Content\Search\Results), '<ul class='ipsP...', Object(IPS\Http\Url\Friendly))
#7 ./mysite.com/public/system/Theme/Theme.php(847) : eval()'d code(2915): IPS\Theme\_SandboxedTemplate->__call('resultStream', Array)
#8 ./mysite.com/public/system/Theme/SandboxedTemplate.php(61): IPS\Theme\class_core_front_search->results('["booking.com",...', 'ae70512e437bcea...', Object(IPS\Content\Search\Results), '<ul class='ipsP...', Object(IPS\Http\Url\Friendly), 997)
#9 ./mysite.com/public/system/Theme/Theme.php(847) : eval()'d code(2992): IPS\Theme\_SandboxedTemplate->__call('results', Array)
#10 ./mysite.com/public/system/Theme/SandboxedTemplate.php(61): IPS\Theme\class_core_front_search->search('["booking.com",...', 'ae70512e437bcea...', Object(IPS\Content\Search\Results), '<ul class='ipsP...', Object(IPS\Http\Url\Friendly), Array, '\n\n\n<form accept...', 997)
#11 ./mysite.com/public/applications/core/modules/front/search/search.php(730): IPS\Theme\_SandboxedTemplate->__call('search', Array)
#12 ./mysite.com/public/applications/core/modules/front/search/search.php(80): IPS\core\modules\front\search\_search->_results()
#13 ./mysite.com/public/system/Dispatcher/Controller.php(96): IPS\core\modules\front\search\_search->manage()
#14 ./mysite.com/public/system/Dispatcher/Dispatcher.php(152): IPS\Dispatcher\_Controller->execute()
#15 ./mysite.com/public/index.php(13): IPS\_Dispatcher->run()
#16 {main}

The error itself is: OutOfBoundsException::0

I have one regexp configured on my community, it rewrites the links of booking.com. It looks like this:

However when I try to search by booking.com in the search engine I receive the following: 

Quote

[[Template core/front/search/resultStream is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Is it possible that this app interferes with that? I tried disabling the regex, but the problem persisted. I suppose the search index needs to be regenerated to test that, which will take a while. If you have some reg ex defined on your test/dev board maybe try to search by domain to try to replicate the problem 🙂

Featured topics should be the ones you want to focus some attention at. Yet, currently they are only highlighted briefly in topic list with a small icon and only if you create a dedicated feed for them. I use both of these in my community and the results are underwhelming. I want featured topics to be more prominent. 

It would be much more eye catching and attention grabbing if we can highlight the background of such topics in activity stream or maybe in topic list as well. Something like this (click on the link, attaching images is currently buggy):

I've seen it on reddit and it really makes topics pop out in a prominent, but not overly invasive way. 

Would something like this be easy to achieve, maybe as a 3rd party mod too?

Kinda new to the entire Discord thing. Can anyone share what would be the use case for multiple magic invites? In my mind you either give access to them to certain member group or you don't. Why do we need multiple ones?

2 minutes ago, Daniel F said:

You could trigger the cleanup tasks several times manually and see if it helps . 

The amount of rows dropped from 25k to 14k, but the size is more or less the same. Reduced it 1 day, 25 rows, still the same size, lol. Ran optimize on the table - everything is back in order, maybe I should have started with that 🙂

Found it and reduced it from 90 to 30 days. Hope it helps. 

I just noticed that the table core_file_logs is pretty big, 500MB, taking about 20% of the entire db size. From the contents of the table I cannot identify what it is storing, but the "logs" in the name implies that it is probably something that can be pruned 🙂

What is stored here, is it safe to truncate and is there any way we can control its size from an ACP setting or something?

Do we have to rebuy this under the new ownership?

4 hours ago, Rhys Hanrahan said:

I couldn't find the AdminCP panel that's been mentioned originally, so I'm very curious to look at my cache value after running another benchmark with Redis.

When you go in Support page, the redis server data on the right widget is clickable and leads to the page you are looking for.

3 minutes is my caching time if it helps. Maybe try to reduce this from 15 minutes just as a test?

I don't think I changed much from the default redis settings either. 

Its a custom profile field with custom templating. Something like this:

So if he entered Leicester in the field, the following image will be displayed: /path_to_logos/Leicester.jpg

Thats a very rough example, feel dree to add styling, dimensions, etc. 

@sadams101, how big/active is your community? Mine is medium size, but the amount used by redis look really small. 

500k posts ,200 online at active hours.

3 hours ago, Adriano Faria said:

Wouldn't the 4.5 Zapier integration totally replace the need of this resource? See Self-Integration there. Of course it will not be complete at first but others will be able to hook and improve the feature over time.

While Zapier will help, it will probably replace not more then 5% of the functionality of this app, at least in the beginning. 

- Can't mass message/notify your memberbase, zapier pricing skyrockets after 2k tasks
- Doesn't have the custom data fields that Rules has. 
- It will be at least few years until it can even remotely match the available in Rules trigger/conditions/actions. 

So yeah, it is the next best thing, but it is very far from being able to challenge it. 

Then maybe a field for the iso code would be helpful? I guess it might break things if users input random string there. Its the permanent tradeoff between user friendliness and flexibiilty 🙂

By the way, for the related books themselves, isn't there an books api call as well? The search by title sounds kinda rough, although it will at least capture sequels under the same umbrella title.