opentype
Content Type
Downloads
Release Notes
IPS4 Guides
IPS4 Developer Documentation
Invision Community Blog
Development Blog
Deprecation Tracker
Providers Directory
Forums
Events
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by opentype
-
That is normal. It’s a template set for the Pages application. The templates are installed inside the Pages application.
-
You can override it in your custom.css with CSS: #elBlogHeaderStats { background: #00AA00; }
-
It is possible with the normal permission system. You just have to apply the permissions on the category level, not the item level. But in the feeds where all items are mixed, it still leads to the result you are asking for. You can also use Pages feed blocks which have the option to ignore user permissions, so you get a proper preview without view access of the entry.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
You are probably missing that changing the Pages record image pixel sizes only affects new uploads. You would need to raise those values (in the Pages database settings) and then upload the images again to avoid low-res images.
-
The answer is in the error message. You need to cover every possible scenario. You only cover 0 to 0,1 but nothing above. The highest option should have that “any value” checkbox checked.
-
There are two possible solutions: 1. Change the thumbnail size in your Pages database settings: Important: Changing this value will NOT change anything at first. This will only have an effect once you upload new images. 2. Use full resolution images in the listing You can change this by turning off thumbnails in the SuperGrid plugin settings: This will work instantly, but the pages will load a little bit slower.
-
The answer is still the same:
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
It’s defined in the theme’s CSS and there are tons of of different font size declarations. So there is no simple setting or way to raise the font sizes in general. As a start, you can try to add this to your custom.css: .ipsType_normal { font-size: 19px; }
-
To be fair to the support staff, that is exactly what the general support department is supposed to do when you contact them. They advise on the software usage and explain your options, i.e. in this case, the option to turn it off. They aren’t in a position to decide to change that feature, nor to do it themselves instantly. If anything, they can pass it along to other team members who make those decisions. So I don’t really know what you expected from them that justifies this condescending tone.
-
It’s a permission you set per group in the group settings:
-
It’s just styling for regular Pages blocks. So you can put those blocks wherever you want and mix them with other content. It will work fine for regular Pages articles as long as the Record Image is used.
-
I’m certain HTML input is always validated server-side. But mostly for security reasons. You would need a kind of artificial intelligence program to decide what visually breaks the output somehow. There are thousands of things one can do with HTML styling that other readers or the admin wouldn’t want. Personally, I would just deal with that through moderation.
-
Shouldn’t “Mark site as read” not instantly set the value to zero? It looks like the the unread count still remains for the full cache time, which is rather confusing—looking at the empty “unread page” with the red counter still showing lot’s of unread posts.
-
That is not possible or planned. Blocks are meant to show a few entries (“latest“, “featured ” and so on). They are not meant for browsing many entries at once.
-
It’s the Display Custom Format code for an URL field and an Address field.
-
Link button: {{if $formValue}}<a href="{$formValue}" target="_blank" class="ipsButton ipsButton_important">Website</a>{{endif}} Map: <div class="ipsColumns"> <div class="ipsColumn ipsColumn_wide"> <p>{map}</p> </div> <div class="ipsColumn ipsColumn_fluid"> <p class="ipsType_light">Address: <br>{address}</p> </div> </div>
-
If it’s a radio field, it can be left without a value.
-
Check the field keys. That defines the special treatment for the quotes. You might have set the quote field key for the title instead of the quote field — or something like that.
-
It’s controlled through the global “Field Options” under the “Options” tab in the database settings. That will be used for all listing views.
-
Sounds like you figured it out already. That’s the process. Make a field a filter and then add the filter widget. If something is not working you would have to talk to IPS, since that widget is entirely controlled by them. It’s independent from the template on the page.
-
I see. Yeah that should be part of the admin-defined product fields, which do not exist yet. If they get added, there could be a checkbox “Show on cart”. (P.S. I just checked if Amazon.de fulfills this requirement and they just stick everything in the product title.)
-
Can you give a real-world example of the product types that require this and what those options would be? It would probably help.
-
'Print Topic' option missing after upgrade?
opentype replied to dNetAus2's topic in Technical Problems
It can be done easily with just a few lines of CSS. You essentially just add a “display:none” for everything you don’t need. Sidebar, header, footer—whatever it is. But it makes sense to do that as a custom job, not a site feature, since what is to be included might depend on each site or even each page as your request demonstrates. -
Can you send me a message with a link to the page so I can check it out? For further inspections I might also need ACP access. The category images come from this plugin. It is an optional purchase from another developer.
-
That isn’t true. There are lots of standard Commerce features directly made for physical products. Product dimensions and weight; shipping options; shipping addresses; stock options; product options with varying prices … Now that is a completely different argument, since it relates to EU laws not just physical products. My suggestion would be to open a feature request topic in the feedback forum and describe clearly what you (or all EU shops selling physical goods) need. Just asking them to “support such standards” probably won’t do anything. You need to be specific. And have patience. 😉 I’ve been asking for support of EU VAT ID checks during checkout since 2015 and it seems to finally come to Commerce later this year.
