Jump to content


Pavel Chernitsky

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Pavel Chernitsky

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Pavel Chernitsky's Achievements

  1. Oh, OK, thanks. That makes sense. We still haven't upgraded to 4.6.4, so I can't confirm it's fixed, but I'll return to update once we do.
  2. Looks like a bug or something. I'm on 4.6.3 and it still renews every 6 months. Maybe you're part of some kind of "A/B test" 😄
  3. sounds reasonable. are threads/content (I guess you mean blog posts, articles etc.?) counted differently? I have both rules set up to give one point for every instance.
  4. Unfortunately we didn't, but I've recreated them using the current existing ranks (renamed and changed the points threshold). I've also activated the two rules you mentioned - but they're giving way more points than they should. For example, I have 4141 posts, but received 6831 points. It looks like it doesn't mesh with reputation, since I have 1845 point, which if added, give a total of 5986 points, so...🤷‍♂️ also, you mean "content item posted", right?
  5. Can anyone from the team (@Jordan Invision @Matt or anybody else) help me out here? I've rebuilt the ranks a few more times since posting this thread and I can't, for the life of me, get the system to reproduce the way the pips worked - one point per content item (opening a thread or posting in one, publishing a blog post or article in pages etc. Without taking into account reputation and reactions).
  6. We're trying to get the new ranks system to "simulate" the old pips, and I've set it up to basically have one rule - 1 point per thread/post/comment (basically any content item). But I can't seem to get it to work straight. The "Comment/reply posted" rule gave to much points so I changed it to "Content item posted" but it give to few points... Before I change it again and am forced to wait 2-3 days to see the results, can I ask for an simple explanation of the system's rule triggers (not the default ones but the ones selectable in the dropdown menu) and perhaps even add an example when a rule is triggered and an example when it isn't. e.g (only for demonstration purposes) "Member buys a subscription" is only triggered when a paid subscription is purchased. isn't triggered on free subscriptions, up/down grades. thanks.
  7. Hi @Matt I've followed along with the guide and it seems to only show the titles (on "content submissions) to staff, regardless of the option chosen. Also, as you can see in the screenshots, I've moved the title upwards in the block, can you tell me where I need to put the css text in order for it to show directly under the username? Thanks. Below are screenshots of the issue. The Option + Formatting setting: Admin view (With title outlined): Regular member view:
  8. Yeah, I know, great title, right...? I just don't know how to better explain it. Our community has the "Users must acknowledge issued warnings before posting again?" option ticked, because we're very strict in regards to following our community guidelines and rules. However, we've also set up one of the warnings as an no-points anonymous management message to a member for times when we want to tell a member something like "we've edited your thread's title" (ahem ahem... 😛) and don't want them to be intimidated by the "YOU'VE BEEN WARNED, BOY!" popup and the "you must acknowledge..." banner (which some new member just miss altogether and send support requests saying they can't post). Is there a way to have one (or some) of the warnings not require acknowledgment, or have it a per-warning toggle? If there isn't, can you make it so?
  9. Oh snap, I forgot about the singular/plural and was looking for the string "X posters in" in the translator... 🤦‍♂️ After seeing it isn't selectable via the quick translate I just thought it's hard coded... Sorry about that, and as always thanks for the help!
  10. EDIT: It actually IS translatable, I was being dumb. Hey, The "X posters in [Topic name]" isn't translatable (The "Who posted in this topic" headline is fine). could you have a look at it? Thanks.
    Very useful. Super easy to use. Exactly all the options/customizations you'd need. And incredibly fast and to-the-point responses and support from the creator. What else can you want?
  11. Awesome, I remembered I once saw something along those lines but couldn't remember where. Purchased. Also, while we're on the subject, here something totally unrelated 😄 IPS really needs to un-bad-word-that-got-deleted the search algorithm lol. Searched the marketplace section in the ACP for a string ("Who Posted in This Topic"). The result that's named EXACTLY THAT was... drum roll... SIXTEENTH! I mean, it's more funny than anything else because there aren't that many results, but seriously, what the actual F...
  12. Is there a block that shows a list of members who posted in a topic (obviously on the topic where the block is placed)? Or can one be made using the custom blocks? I looked through all the available blocks and found many many blocks the show all kinds of member lists, couldn't see anything like that. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use technologies, such as cookies, to customise content and advertising, to provide social media features and to analyse traffic to the site. We also share information about your use of our site with our trusted social media, advertising and analytics partners. See more about cookies and our Privacy Policy