Sonya*

9 minutes ago, Matt said:

I really liked the Pages suggestion honestly. It's just that it's a complex area of code that we have earmarked to refactor at some point, so it's not something we'd consider before then.

@Matt, is there any particular reason, that Pages databases are not included in the Creator plan? Is that due your new infrastructure? 

Savior is here! 🤫

Choose another template for the Articles template under Homepage Options:

Category 2 Column First Featured and so on is probably what you are looking for.

9 minutes ago, Jamynee said:

So I'm going to try to use the default "Articles" page I suppose but creating a blog-like home page with boxes representing each article (rather than a forum-like list of articles names)

This is there out of the box. Just change the setting of your database to 

It is not that pretty, but better than a data list.

11 minutes ago, Matt said:

such as LEGO, Squarespace, SEGA, Mattel, etc.

I cannot find a SEGA community, only the old reddit post, that the forums have been shut down back in 2019. 

I am late to the party, but if it is updated, count me too. 🙂

• IPS Blogs are suitable for the community members blogs
• Pages are suitable for editorial content

With Pages you can build any kind of databases https://invisionify.com/fxpages/databases/

55 minutes ago, opentype said:

If you "Upgrade to Cloud" in the Creator plan, you are going to lose a lot of functionality, that is included in self-hosted. E. g.

• no Pages databases
• no custom apps except those placed in Marketplace
• no API access (e.g. webhooks or REST API)
• no integrations like SendGrid, Pixabay, Facebook Pixel, Maxmind etc.
• no Elasticsearch and thus no similar content widget based on it
• no hosting in the EU

This is what I understand from the new pricing plans. So, it is indeed a feature downgrade, if you switch from self-hosted to Creator. You have to go with Creator Pro to get the same functionality you have as self-hosted.

1 minute ago, opentype said:

At the moment, I would wait to see what this new “Page Builder” thing is that appeared on the Pricing page.

It is just Pages, that they call Page Builder now. Pages are not fully available on the smallest IPS Cloud plan (Creator). There are only:

• Dynamic pages
• Custom blocks from data feeds
• Custom blocks with WYSIWYG editing

But no databases. Databases are only for Creator Pro and above. 

Just now, Marc Stridgen said:

As mentioned, please put these within the suggestions area 🙂 

I am a bit confused. 🤨 I have reported it in Help & Support https://invisioncommunity.com/forums/topic/466740-same-block-with-background-and-without/ I thought, it is something, that is open and will be solved some day. Am I right, that the linked topic is abandoned now because "if we apply any styling we are wrong, and if we dont we are wrong."?

If yes, it would be nice, if you put this comment in the linked topic, so that I know, it is something that will be never solved. Then I can create a suggestion in Feature forum. 

34 minutes ago, Marc Stridgen said:

The issue is if we apply any styling we are wrong, and if we dont we are wrong.

There could be an option though in the widget itself. Apply ipsBox? Yes/No. This would not break anything and anyone can set it the way they needed. 😉 

This is how IPS is designed unfortunately. 

I am asked again and again, why my app FX Pages changes the theme. And if it is safe to confirm new versions on the screen below. And if it will break their theme...

This is due to the message the users see when an upgrade for Pages templates is there. The message says the new version of the theme (there is no new theme!) has changed the templates they have edited (they do not have edited any!).

Can we have a message that states what really happens? E. g. 

Some templates have been changed in the new version of the application. Please confirm the changes.

It would be also nice to have the message formatted as a warning (ipsMessage_warning) instead of an error. Just to not frighten the user 😉 

And ideally have a button where we confirm all new versions with just one click. For non-technical users, those screens with a lot of code are dreadful 😨

Thank you!

It is explained here https://invisionify.com/fxpages/features/table-of-contents/#toc0

This is how the software describes what it is doing 🤨

Quote

Even if hidden from the store, it will still show on the registration form if that setting is enabled, users who have previously purchased will still be able to renew, and users who have purchased other products in the same group may still be able to upgrade/downgrade to this product.

And at the same time:

Quote

You can force users to purchase a product when registering in the Store Settings. In order for a package to show on the registration form it must be set to show in the store and be available to the Guests group. 

This is from the first post of the thread. One of the descriptions should be false.

If your own page is made with Pages, then you can add this to the page template:

{{\IPS\Output::i()->cssFiles = array_merge( \IPS\Output::i()->cssFiles, \IPS\Theme::i()->css( 'forums.css', 'forums', 'front' ) );}}

I have found a reason. I see HTTP 429 on https://example.com/search/?csrfKey=b2350d2512bdf123166bf04d9be93ff5&q=test&page=1 every time I search in the overlay. I have increased Delay to start search to 1s and seems to work now.

It comes back when I enable autocomplete. I am not sure right now, if it is a server setting or your app sending too much requests in a short time. 🤨

Hi, if I use overlay search, no results are found for a certain term. If I switch to Advanced Search, 6 results are found. 

After clicking on advanced search

No errors in logs. I use ElasticSearch if it matters.

@DawPi, your app is almost perfect. However, I am missing content fields in Pages. 

I see custom links perfectly parsed in forum posts, calendar events, comments, and reviews in Pages. But the content field (article body) is not respected. This is critical for me. 😞 

Not yet. I am still somewhere in between Custom Links by @DawPi not reinventing the wheel and a plugin preventing linking itself.

I tend to write my plugin though.

Should it work in Pages as well? It seems not adding links to content field.

7 minutes ago, teraßyte said:

@Sonya* That's not what he wants as every user would have the same photo with those steps:

 

There were two different requirements. I have quoted the one, that he can achieve without any customization.

One question. Does Limit Link restrict the linking inside a page or a single content piece?

I mean, if I have a topic where a word is repeated again and again in every post, then it will be linked in every post. It would not link twice inside one post, but there would be 10 links on one page if the word is used in 10 posts on the topic. Right?