rodege5389

The ignore system makes absolutely no sense how it works now. 

same thing

Our users also complained on this. +1

I'm surprised this isn't in there by default.   If I ignore a user, that means I shouldn't see their stuff ever.

My users have been bugging me about this forever. 
Nobody wants to see the activity stream full of ignored user messages.

great idea, invision need this

Please, add the ability to ignore content itens on streams. There isn’t much sense in ignore someone else’s posts and then have streams constantly bumped with topics/posts made by a ignored user. 
Tks.

I think the ignore feature needs a few more features to be useful.  Right now it really serves no purpose other than to make members angry/upset when they try to use it and find out it doesn't really serve a purpose.  Most sites give you the ability to actually block someone, preventing them from seeing your content or your account.  My members have been begging me for improvements to this feature or to implement a true blocking system, but it's odd to me that previous people who have requested this are never responded to, or are basically told just use the ignore feature as is and act like an adult about it.
The internet if filled with millions of people of all ages, and just because someone is an adult doesn't mean they'll act like one.  I don't think it's unreasonable to provide a little more in terms of someone feeling more secure about their privacy.
User A ignores User B, so all applicable content by User B is now hidden to User A, and User B is unable to send private messages to User A.  However, User B doesn't know they are being ignored by User A and has no restrictions given to them.  The ignore system works basically as if User A is the one being blocked from User B's content which seems backwards.  User B should be aware they are blocked and have the consequence of User A basically not existing to them in any capacity.
My members are requesting these common blocking features:
A blocked/ignored user cannot see the content of the blocker. A blocked/ignored user cannot view the account profile of the blocker. A blocked/ignored user cannot tag/mention the blocker in any content. If there is a plugin or app that already implements these improvements, please direct me to it.  If not, I can assure anyone who creates one will receive immediate downloads/sales.

It would be really cool to be able to have an additional option when we create a block that would allow members to click on a cross which would be at the far right of the block title and which would hide the block from members who clicked above. Or something like on the forums, with a arrow you can minimize the box.
In the same vein, that of being able to move certain blocks if we have checked the box allowing members to do so.
This would allow members to customize the configuration of certain pages a bit more.

Fantastic suggestion! I've often thought about this when logging in, yet always forget to ask. There's sensitive information in here about our sites that additional layers of security would help mitigate against exposure.

I asked for this as well during a private conversation with @Lindy, since there are purchases and licenses, I believe it is our interest to protect as of our accounts as possible.

Hi,
I noticed that you guys haven't enabled 2FA here in the Invision Community/Client Area. Could you please do that? I am enabling 2FA in all my accounts everywhere.
Thanks.

I got it...just wish there was a core feature for that exact same thing.  I try to keep my forum running with as little3rd party plugins as possible to make it easier to upgrade but it is getting harder and harder because there are so many cool plugins and apps that I want to run! 

We know, and we don't need it all. At all 🙂
The only thing we need is a widget where we could use HTML. It has to be a core functionality. It's logical and obvious.
It's a weird way to try selling the "Pages" app. It causes distrust and disappointment, not sales. 😥
Please, discuss it internally. I'm sure the Pages app will not suffer from moving such a small feature to a more logical place - the core.

+1 for moving this feature into the core. In our case, we don't need pages app at all. Just one widget is not a good reason to buy something you don't need.

Why isn't there a custom widget block for adding random things to your sidebar like HTML and text?  I was able to add a plugin to do it but I really think this should be a core feature.  I don't have Pages so I am not able to use page builder widgets either.

Using the "My Activity Streams" option there's an option to "Create New Stream"...
There should be an option to locate all the threads that have zero replies. Then you can reply to all threads that have none and improve engagement.
I asked support about it but they said that they used to have this option but pulled it for some reason. I looked in the Marketplace but couldn't find a solution.
Does anybody know if there is one?

1. The right panel in the topic can be shown when there are more than N messages in the topic. Why can't it be disabled at all?
Decided :)
2. Why can I make my own button for the editor, but I can't delete it? Only restore the original values for the entire editor is available.
I think this needs to be fixed.

Wanted to renewals Links Directory by Adriano and marketplace FORCE me to pay all renewals for all my apps plugins and themes over the years . force me to pay several hundreds of dollar , this must be bug or the method is crazy ..
Best Regads

I don't want approve, not resend validation email, nor ban.
I want unapprove this email change. How?
 
And second thing: when member changed email address, new notification go to new email.
But they should go to the new email after confirmation. Member changed email to blahblah@blahblah.tld and now I get Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender notifications.
 

So i need unapprove this email change and reset settings to the his/her original email address.
 

Here are some related posts and topics on these forums:
 
 

+1 vote for the suggestion to support U2F in the IPS core. It is supported in all modern browsers now.
https://caniuse.com/#search=U2F
Also, U2F is widely adopted and supported by companies and governments. It's already implemented in Amazon, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, GitHub, GitLab, Dropbox, and many other internet giants.
U2F is much more convenient to use compared to all currently supported 2FA methods.

U2F is more secure, and is supported by the security paranoid (such as myself)... I use it on my Google account too.

It would be nice to see official support for Universal Second Factor (HW Security keys) as a 2FA option.

The maximum height for the embeds and uploaded videos must have a limit.
Here is why.