CoffeeCake

Just wanted to follow up on this since I recent have been doing some ES related work, will ES 7.x support still be coming to 4.5?

Hi,
This morning I woke up to find that tens of thousands of spam emails were sent through the "share by email" feature.
The support's brilliant suggestion was to disabling that feature.
So instead of taking the responsibility to fix or remove a easily abusible feature, it's the customer's responsibility to disable it.
Bravo!
If the content that is to be shared can be removed and replaced by a spam message, then the feature is clearly broken. If this happens tens of thousands of times, and the system doesn't catch that, then the system is broken too.

Seconding this request. We'd rather our members didn't solicit each other for e-mail addresses for privacy reasons, but would like to give them the option to gift other members by name.

I just wanted to note that we've improved the error message for this error in 4.5, so users at least won't see a mysterious "-200" message when it happens.

Well, it's your assumption. No more no less. But what about the diagnostics instead of assumptions? WIll IPS provide informative error instead of just "-200"?
93 frames and 816kb is nothing for GIFs. Most of uploaded GIFs on my forums has a lot more frames and sizes (and a lot of them was uploaded when i used ImageMagic).

As i already said, problem is not related to the count of frames of to the size of the GIF, it just appears with some of GIFs, not matter how large or small they are, or how much frames does they have. I've uploaded bigger GIFs with much more frames and it worked just fine. Played around with timeouts and memory limits, e.t.c. and it does not affected the error with GIFs which has lower size and less frames.
Does not matter, the actual problem is lack of information in the error, that's it.

I agree, the NOFOLLOW on everything will still work but it doesn't help Google better understand and process links on my site as well as sites pointing to my site. Eventually, Google will make the proposed changes a requirement or drop it altogether.
Google makes changes gradually. 
Plus, it doesn't hurt to give admins some control over this. Currently, it's either NOFOLLOW or nothing. (Just make the current option a dropdown.)
Let us decide.
 

Yes, please. This plugin appears to be no longer available, and it'd be better if it happened upon submission and not on load.

Hi, this looks as if it's going to be an extremely useful function.

Maybe it's there already but I haven't found it yet. If it's not then is it possible to include a column in the list to explain why the person is being tracked – new member, bannned, warned et cetera or the name of the site team member who began the tracking.
 

 
As far as I can see the moment, it's not possible to know from this list the reason for the tracking and it seems that there is enough space to add an additional column or two.
 
Thanks

I would like to have an option to send a gift card per PM or for an other member. Some of our users would buy a gift card for other users on our site. But they cannot see the email of the user. In this case it would be nice, if they just could select a member name and the gift card is sent per PM or email to the selected user. At the moment they have to ask for email.

Thanks, it uploaded successfully. I had previously modified the json to swap to InnoDB, yet it took the new version just fine.

Hey @Paul E.
This should not happen and it should use whatever your default table engine is on installation - this is likely a carry-over from an older version of IPS that hasn't been changed yet. I'll have this fixed today and push out a maintenance release for it.

Made a quick plugin: Block Banned Profiles.xml

The only issue here is that the system treats regular banned and spammer banned in the say way (at least I couldn't identify a difference quickly) so it will block all banned profiles.

Just so that people know.  If links are being moderated, the anchor link button will not appear in the editor toolbar, no matter what the permission settings are.  Below is the support response from Lindy.
 

There really should be a setting for a resend attempt to clear out the log. One by one clicking is insanity.