Simon Woods

You may want to wait until you can see it for yourself as I think you are misinterpreting what this does

To expand on this - yes. So say, for example, you do not require users to set a profile photo, but then add a step so that it is required, then all users who did not set one previously will then be prompted to do so.

If you make that field a required step, then you can still ban people based on the content - and they will *have* to complete it before they can do anything else.

It may help to reprogram yourself from "required fields" to "required steps".
You can add multiple custom fields into a single step and make that step required, meaning all elements need to be completed.

This was the only reason I could not use social logins. With release of 4.2 it seems we will be able to activate it. ..

Very well done!

Looks good.  Can we still have fields that are required upon registration and use this system?  I have one field I added to help cut down on spammers. 

Cool. it seems to give the opportunity to enable social login and still have birthday - location or other required fields to be completed before posting.
Can this be used to force users that already have uncomplete profiles ? ( some intend to delete birthday upon registration )

Yes, if you add a new field as required it will prompt all existing members to complete that field.

Yes. So if you allow Facebook log ins, then they will have to complete any required steps before they can access the community.

The "Question and Answer" challenge fields still show on the initial registration form. Any custom profile fields that are required show on the wizard view to keep the registration form more friendly.l

I agree...but realistically, we can't expect everything everyone wants all at once .  The IPS staff have been working on a lot of different updates for 4.2 so I assume this is a jumping-off point and that Club-specific Pages/database functionality will be the next logical step.
@Lindy Hint hint.

@Rikki and whoever else: these are *much* better than 4.1 - well done!

This was mentioned here: 
 

Admin login not included: 
As such I assume that admins cannot be blocked.

@Tracy Perry This should help you.