opentype

Please check your language string for “cms_byline”. I guess you have customized that, which leads to this result. 
By the default, it’s …
By %s, in <a href='%s'>%s</a>, which would separate the entries through commas. 

Yes. You set up categories to structure your tutorials and each record becomes a “step” of the tutorial category those steps are placed in. 
If you are just starting out with Pages databases, I would suggest to go through all the Pages steps in the IPS Guides section. 
The details of setting up and using SuperHelp are all explained in the instruction PDF. 
Feel free to ask if you still run into specific problems. But it would be way too much to walk you through the whole process of learning Pages and configuring everything in this support topic. 

Not at the moment. Maybe I add that in a future version. The size is also fixed. The intention is that people should focus on the headline, not some big or flashy image. ;-)

What do you mean by “find” the topic? Through the search function? Access in the browser URL bar? Or from within a script? …?
Regarding the address bar, you can just access the topic through /00000-something
Which means: the ID followed by a hyphen and something else. Example to access this topic:
https://invisionpower.com/forums/topic/436181-doesn’t-matter https://invisionpower.com/forums/topic/436181-x https://invisionpower.com/forums/topic/436181-hello All forwards to the same topic. 

It certainly can. One just sets up a database for the jobs. Categories, filters, fields for maps, dates, links … it’s all there already. If you want, you can also cross-link different databases, e.g. if you want a separate job and company database. 

Yes, you are supposed to. That template requires several levels of categories to make sense. 

What's New in Version 1.0.4:
New Feature:
Convert forums or apps categories into Club Features with a single click, so you don't need to move a bunch of items (topics, images, files, events, etc) - Admin CP feature. New option in all nodes on ACP:

See it in action:
 

It certainly can. One just sets up a database for the jobs. Categories, filters, fields for maps, dates, links … it’s all there already. If you want, you can also cross-link different databases, e.g. if you want a separate job and company database. 

No, it's in my to-do list. Probably next version. I don't have a specific ETA yet but I don't think it will take long. Getting familiarized with Clubs more and more. 

Getting better and better. Good job! 
I’m looking forward to the turn-forums-into-clubs feature so I can finally get rid of all my “manual clubs” I managed through user groups over the years. Or was that idea dropped? Its not listed anymore. 

What's New in Version 1.0.2:
New Features:
Members can now choose which features will be automatically created when creating the club. This feature will display all features available in your install  (video below) Setting to allow the Club Owner to add manually members/groups to the club  
 

I'll leave them disabled by default and will add a validation to user select at least one.

Looks fine.
The questions is if and what admin options are available to control this new section. Opinions may vary. All checked by default? All off by default? Certain admin-defined apps on by default? Forced to make selection or not? So many options. ;-) 

Looks fine.
The questions is if and what admin options are available to control this new section. Opinions may vary. All checked by default? All off by default? Certain admin-defined apps on by default? Forced to make selection or not? So many options. ;-) 

I see the usefulness of this on my site. People can easily create a club by filling out one form. But if they stop there and don’t instantly look for the link to add apps, they create a club that makes no sense,  because you can’t do anything in there. (I am sceptical about adding one of each though, especially since there currently is no delete option for the club owner.) 
Maybe it should rather work like this:
In the club creation form you get checkboxes for each app for your initial setup – so you get a fully working club as soon as it was created. That would streamline the process and avoid confusion among club owners and people joining (potentially empty) clubs. You just check “topics” and a forum is created. Name and description can be changed/added later. 
And if selecting at least one app is required, the site owner can make sure that all clubs are fully functional instantly. 

I see the usefulness of this on my site. People can easily create a club by filling out one form. But if they stop there and don’t instantly look for the link to add apps, they create a club that makes no sense,  because you can’t do anything in there. (I am sceptical about adding one of each though, especially since there currently is no delete option for the club owner.) 
Maybe it should rather work like this:
In the club creation form you get checkboxes for each app for your initial setup – so you get a fully working club as soon as it was created. That would streamline the process and avoid confusion among club owners and people joining (potentially empty) clubs. You just check “topics” and a forum is created. Name and description can be changed/added later. 
And if selecting at least one app is required, the site owner can make sure that all clubs are fully functional instantly. 

This?
 

It was shown in this picture in january 2016 how to do this already:
 

Looking forward to purchasing this once 4.2 officially is released! 

It’s your theme. It makes the background layer of the text block invisible. If you link the actual page, I can check the CSS styling and probably provide a manual override to fix that. 

Look at what is going on there. Instead of CSS, there is a whole website calling Github files and whatnot. It breaks my 4.2 site (I tested it on) completely. It’s not just Pages templates. 
 

Look at what is going on there. Instead of CSS, there is a whole website calling Github files and whatnot. It breaks my 4.2 site (I tested it on) completely. It’s not just Pages templates. 
 

That’s expected. The new 4.2 reputation calls aren’t in there. I will update it close to the release of 4.2 and then replace the 4.1 version with the 4.2 version. I can’t do that now of course, or it would break for customers who are not running the 4.2 beta. 

That’s expected. The new 4.2 reputation calls aren’t in there. I will update it close to the release of 4.2 and then replace the 4.1 version with the 4.2 version. I can’t do that now of course, or it would break for customers who are not running the 4.2 beta. 

I recommended it too a while ago. Makes perfect sense to support these Twitter meta tags along with the ones Facebook looks for. Tweets with images are so much more likely to get clicks than just plain links. 
If you can’t wait: it’s surprisingly simple to add it to certain templates. For example, I added this to my video database in Pages:
{{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:card'] = 'summary_large_image';}} {{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:site'] = '@TypographyGuru';}} {{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:title'] = $record->_title;}} {{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:description'] = 'Watch this video in the collection of the best typography videos on Typography.Guru';}} {{\IPS\Output::i()->metaTags['twitter:image'] = (string) \IPS\File::get( 'cms_Records', $record->record_image )->url;}}