TSP

If you get the question from your FTP client on a folder, you choose to merge with existing folders. When/if you then get the question on a file, you choose to overwrite existing files. That's what was meant by merge and overwrite. Because you want to merge folders (so no existing files that is not within your patch folder (but is within the selected folder on the server) gets deleted). You usually only get the merge option if it's about a folder. As merging an already existing file with a new file with the same name would not be an sensible option for an FTP client.
Some FTP-clients will provide the option of "Merge and overwrite" right away, which means it will merge folders and overwrite files. 
 

Thank you, this looks great!
I assume this will resolve the situations explained here:  
 

Excellent! I really like the look of the Member Visits tool. Much easier than going through ACP - Members. Are anonymous logins still not being logged or will they show in this?

So whats going to be new in 4.2 that hasnt been around for 2 years already?

But a user is applying ... based on what?  
There's no approval question or comment box for them to explain why they want to join.  I don't see how leaders can justify approvals in Clubs.

I saw that.  But are you ... the Most Special Leader??  
 

Yep, precisely.

How do I get an invite to the Most Special Club?? 

You know, you could actually read the article and not just look at the pictures.  It explains it. 

Gonna have to periodically change the images so the reactions get really confusing on previous posts ?

Who would have thought that the "Reactions" would get such a great reaction?

We encoded the binary image data for the heart icon across all the IPS4.2 source files so it really can never be changed. It took a long time, but we felt it was worth it.

I did it a long time ago
It will look like this))

@Sergey your version looks like more thoughtful 
@Andy design it isnt revelant, there is a some disproportion with left and right side

This version looks better & cleaner to me.

The border around follow, start new topic, moderator actions, download, mark forum read etc are ugly in the video. It looked better here https://dne4i5cb88590.cloudfront.net/invisionpower-com/monthly_2017_03/58c07545c350e_ExampleTopic-ATestForum-IPSCommunitySuite2017-03-0816-18-51.png.b6cc154b2c613d2bafcb156f03671a29.png

Now did Mark break into Matt's account, or did Matt steal Mark's Mac? 
Seriously though, this is a great advancement for the suite. I hope it does improve the issue(s) stated above with being force logged out on every ACP session.

I didn't look very closely at the images earlier. Giving such large emphasis to the search input in the admin panel in 4.2 is a very good touch!
And all the settings and information areas for this looks nice

Yep

New AdminCP design is AWESOME. Can't wait to try it out

How about letting us fill in an optional name of your choosing as one of the options? It would both change the name to make them "anonymous", but also make it easier to distinguish deleted members. 

As a prototype, it looks really good.
What it really needs now is the ability to toggle it off and on in the editor so I can post as either admin/mod or as a community member.

Thanks for clarifying that.
In that case I think it is something that will have limited use overall. At the very least per forum setting is needed, imho.

in the 3.x versions, we can determine the forum id by $ this->request ['f'] in every template even in topicView and globalTemplate. Whether it is possible to do the same in 4th version?