aia Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 How about this feature? Easy in implementation, but very useful.
Nathan Explosion Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Go ahead and implement it yourself - easy.
craigf136 Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 I've actually installed it but going to remove it, I can't get it to work once the post has been published.
Nathan Explosion Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 Ah that's a shame - that was working sweet on the majority of 4.0.x releases. Just got round to upgrading my test install to 4.0.13.1 (from 4.0.10) and it's not working anymore. Bugger.
GrooveOnBeat Posted September 19, 2015 Posted September 19, 2015 I'm all for naming Spoilers. Nice suggestion!
aia Posted December 16, 2015 Author Posted December 16, 2015 On 19.09.2015 at 2:22 PM, Nathan Explosion said: Go ahead and implement it yourself - easy. I know and already did, but it's a suggestion to implement it by default. Even if we know how to implement it on our installations, why do not make all IPS forums better? Our users really love this feature
aia Posted April 18, 2017 Author Posted April 18, 2017 @Simon Woods, thanks. But i'm sure it's something what must be in IPS by default, because it's too useful and too easy-to-implement and there is really no any objective reason to do not do that.
Aramaech Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 This is where we post suggestions to improve the forum software, not to request help getting a certain thing done on our own build, correct? So if someone's posting a suggestion on this board, the appropriate response is not "Here's an app that does that", it's I agree or disagree that this suggestion should be part of the software by default, and maybe why or why not. "Here's an app that does that" would instead be the appropriate response on the peer to peer support board. Perhaps the thinking is something like "well if they want this feature, I can at least help them out in the meantime", but (aside from almost never being delivered in that context) that presumes that they don't know where to go looking, or how to ask, if they actually do want a workaround in the meantime. I only say that because I see a lot of those types of responses on this board, and ultimately I think it obscures the intentions of the board by diverting people to quick fixes and away from discussions of the softwares actual default state.
Simon Woods Posted April 21, 2017 Posted April 21, 2017 35 minutes ago, RobotMonkeyHead said: This is where we post suggestions to improve the forum software, not to request help getting a certain thing done on our own build, correct? So if someone's posting a suggestion on this board, the appropriate response is not "Here's an app that does that", it's I agree or disagree that this suggestion should be part of the software by default, and maybe why or why not. "Here's an app that does that" would instead be the appropriate response on the peer to peer support board. Perhaps the thinking is something like "well if they want this feature, I can at least help them out in the meantime", but (aside from almost never being delivered in that context) that presumes that they don't know where to go looking, or how to ask, if they actually do want a workaround in the meantime. I only say that because I see a lot of those types of responses on this board, and ultimately I think it obscures the intentions of the board by diverting people to quick fixes and away from discussions of the softwares actual default state. I'm confident that if somebody really wants something in the core then they'll have the maturity to keep discussing it, whether in their original thread or re-posting to say things like "I asked about this previously and still no feedback" or whatever.
GrooveOnBeat Posted April 22, 2017 Posted April 22, 2017 It'll be a nice little touch for (the upcoming) IPS 4.2, would you say?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.