opentype
Content Type
Downloads
Release Notes
IPS4 Guides
IPS4 Developer Documentation
Invision Community Blog
Development Blog
Deprecation Tracker
Providers Directory
Projects
Release Notes v5
Invision Community 5 Bug Tracker
Forums
Events
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by opentype
-
Sorry, I was talking about the black background of the database link field. The header area can’t be changed. It’s up to you to turn on the Record Image field for the review database. If you do that, people can add a main image for each review and that will appear in that header area. If there is no image, it will look like it does now. As you can see here on my demo site: https://www.opentype.space/mode3reviews/
-
It’s the database relationship field. I don’t know much about your site or the stuff you want to review. If different objects need different review options, then you either need to: – use categories in your reviews database and turn different fields per category on and off – or use different databases for the reviews.
-
That’s correct this way. You can turn off the black background if you want in the field settings. I would also recommend to make that field required, so every review has to have linked entry being reviewed. Showing the field makes sense for the listing view, since the rest of the review (title, images) doesn’t necessarily show WHAT is being reviewed. Yes. Put a link somewhere. In the sub-menu, the sidebar, wherever. You can directly link to the form to create a new review record. Sure, you can use categories. You can use anything that Pages can do. That’s the beauty of building this on top of Pages. 😉
-
Should be fine.
-
Yep. While it sounds good in theory, it was tried over and over again on so many sites, but it failed and was removed. It remains a back end feature for all sorts of services, but only there.
-
The cross-link option appears when you select database relationship:
-
You go to the “Fields” listing of the Review Users database. There you click Create New and follow the rest of the instructions.
-
In the database settings.
-
-
Interesting. Then you better post it in the Feedback forum as feature request. There is no way currently to find username in posts and to anonymize them.
-
Parts of the GDPR read very strictly can be interpreted that way, but there are also clauses which can explicitly overrule that, e.g. “for exercising the right of freedom of expression and information” or “for archiving purposes in the public interest”, which might apply to forum discussions. Just stating what “Jon Doe” said publicly in a forum might be a typical case for both points. For a definitive answer, we would have to wait for a court ruling which specifically deals with that. Note that GDPR is about data processing and the (mis)use which can follow from that. It is not a tool for people to never being mentioned again on the internet. That’s not the goal since it would have tons of bad consequences as well.
-
Not sure what the question is. I see two articles. The only thing missing are the images. Do you have the “record image” field activated and uploaded images for those articles?
-
This is not supported and there are no plans to offer this. Cutting off the full HTML content can lead to all sorts of problems, especially in the more complex layout grids SuperBlocks includes.
-
Yes, that should install the template that is shown as missing. You can check in your plugins section that the plugin was installed and is activated.
-
Are you sure you installed the plugin (not just the block templates)?
-
We would need to know exactly what you want to achieve and then spend time (maybe hours?) developing the code, testing the code, showing it to you and maybe add further feature requests and so on and so forth. That’s NOT a little tutorial. You won’t get that for free. If you really want to learn it, google “Accordion css” or something like that. “Accordion” is the name for this effect.
-
That is calling the generic “row template”. There is no setting to change that currently. In theory, I could improve that in a future update, but there are no immediate plans. It’s just more custom code to maintain. I would need to carefully think about the cost–benefit ratio.
-
You downloaded an outdated version. Remove all SuperGrid templates and the plugin again. Then download and install the files in supergrid_3_0_for_IPS4_3_only.zip
-
It means there is a critical PHP error and the page can’t be rendered at all. There are a couple of options: check the Error Logs and System Logs in the Support section of the ACP. Do they show related errors? Turn on the complete error display in the site’s php.ini so instead of a white page it actually shows the error. switch to 7.x and see it if helps. That’s usually just a few clicks in your host’s backend
-
I would think about which of these external services you actually need.
-
I would consider that chart completely useless without data or observation how your site actually performs. That chart doesn’t show that. How fast does your server respond? When does it start rendering? When it it finished? How much useful information is shown to the user while that is happening? That is what matters. Going by just the graph and what is easily feasible: 1. Why are there redirects? I would check that out. 2. Browser caching. You absolutely want to have that and it can usually be solved with a few lines in the htaccess file.
-
They are checked during submission, but it’s just not feasible to have IPS check every file on the marketplace against every new release. Not software company does that. No user base wants to pay for that. It’s much more reasonable to react to specific problems, e.g. by asking for a refund and IPS can also deactivate files after such problems have demonstrated to occur.
-
That’s customization and I cannot provide support for that.
-
That’s the only easy way.
-
Then maybe don’t complain about it in a topic specifically about TwitterCard support. What has that do do with anything? I specifically explained to you that Twitter forbids the generic fallback data you want for Twitter cards. Feel free to address that argument, research it out yourself or proof me wrong if you can. But it makes no sense to just ignore that fact/argument and just keep repeating “it should be supported” as if what I said hasn’t been said at all. By the way: there is a meta tag section in the ACP where you can set any custom tag you want for any specific URL of your site, e.g. your store front.
