TrixieTang

We're not rushing anything.

Although we are labeling the last 3.0.0 release as 'final' it would be short sighted to expect it to be 'final' as in 'the definitive most perfect edition'. As with any software there are always going to be bugs and brand new major releases are rich pickings. We could either dawdle around with RCs for the next month chipping away at the dribs and drabs reported or just release it and open the flood gates. We'd never release software that was obviously and seriously flawed but a few minor issues in hand isn't going to do any harm. What ever happens, we're going to get hit hard when we release it as 'final' because it'll be used more.

If you are aware of unauthorized distribution or use of IPS products, report it by using this form.

Hi Andrew,

Please fill out this form to inform IPS of the details: http://www.invisionp...iracyreport.php

Thanks
Stuart

If you click the little green arrow next to a user name anywhere on the board, it will show a handy little popup overview, and from there you can find all their posts/topics :)

Well, you guys are coming up with everything I had been asking from Vbulletin which they promptly refused.

Good job.

:rolleyes:



Only mods and admins can see IPs, if you don't trust your staff with seeing your members' IPs then they shouldn't be staff in the first place. And IPs are logged for a reason, that reason is security, if you take away IP logging you'll just have even more security issues to worry about.



Last time I checked people are allowed to post their opinions on suggestions and feedback posted here. And apparently you don't understand that if IPS added an option for every little thing that only you and a few other people want or need it would make the software into a bloated and cluttered mess.

You mean make it so IPs aren't logged? Why would you even want to do that? I mean if you do that then you won't know anyone's IP if you need it.


What if someone keeps coming back to troll? You couldn't ban their IP. What if someone posts something illegal? You wouldn't be able to report their IP to the authorities.


It's a VERY bad idea.

Would it be possible (in a future version, of course, unless it's something you can throw in easily enough) to make the 'report a post' feature use the javascript popup class? If you go into a topic and report the post, when you hit 'back' you get directed back to the page that actually sends the report, and the report gets sent again. If you could just popup a form where you could report the post, the 'back' button will then really go back again.

Maybe I'm crazy, but I thought that the preview board did do it in a popup way back when.

@Wolfie, I'd rather see it as a user-based setting than an ACP setting, but I don't see a problem with adding a setting itself.

As for showing the post, that was a design decision. Talk to Rikki. :whistle:

Ditchmonkey, thanks for the positive feedback. It's great to know that we're able to provide you with a standard of service you're pleased with - we know how important these things are and we appreciate all the tickets, calls and topics like this from you guys telling us we're doing a good job.

Although, I really don't think it's appropriate to start making digs at Jelsoft here, they get enough of that on their own forums.

Is that what vbSEO does? That doesn't seem like it'd be worth it. It would have to run all links through something like cURL to fetch the page source and extract out the page title value. That doesn't seem like it'd be worth it to me, but I'm no SEO guru.

I was thinking the same thing yesterday....

Fixed

Because it's easier to have one than to put hard-coded exceptions all over the place, and because, likely to be used or not, it gives admins full control over permissions, even to the extent of hiding something from themselves should they really want to.

When it's ready

Yes, we added that in. I wrote a function called IPSLib::wait( $seconds ). We felt that life was moving too fast and wanted to slow it down a bit. We think that huge delays in serving up webpages will be a popular feature. Even Google will do the same one day. Just imagine, having to wait for 5 seconds for your search results. I know, it's a crazy concept but I think many will appreciate it.

We suggest you think about a loved one or task to do in that 5 seconds. Maybe take a peek out of the nearest window. Your choice, really. We're giving you the gift of time, it's up to you how you spend it.

I hope we don't get to an RC4. I might cry if we did. >_<

I could be wrong, but if you have a group of global moderators, I don't think you can limit their abilities selectively.

No, there is no downgrade option. And the 2.0 software has not been available for many years now. It's extremely buggy, insecure, and outdated.

We have an internal date we are targetting for RC2, but we're not going to announce it at this time. Suffice it to say, that date is not "1-2 months" away. But we'll see how things go in the tracker before making a final decision.

Why do these topics always come up right after a release? :rolleyes:

Please use the peer to peer forums for support.

I'm pretty sure that they aren't going to release it on a Friday, and I believe the official date for RC 2's release is "Soon", because apparently all the "When it's ready

I'm pretty sure that they aren't going to release it on a Friday, and I believe the official date for RC 2's release is "Soon", because apparently all the "When it's ready

I'm pretty sure that they aren't going to release it on a Friday, and I believe the official date for RC 2's release is "Soon", because apparently all the "When it's ready

Don't worry. It will be released when it's ready. It will be ready when it's released. Just wait a few more months. :lol: