Jump to content

Matt

Management
  • Posts

    70,143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    649

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Projects

Release Notes v5

Invision Community 5 Bug Tracker

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Matt

  1. We’d need access to your site and database to see what the query is. We do cast it int if it’s numeric so something is going wrong there.
  2. That is very odd. Is this still an issue and have you tried another browser?
  3. The ordering issue isn't the same as the GH issue. I think we've (tried) to fix the sorting issue before. If you can give Marc some more information, we can take a look.
  4. The most we could do would be to remove the app but that would mean losing your data. I would work with the app author to better understand what the issue is.
  5. I'd check with your host and look for any rewrite rules.
  6. I'd assume the DOM structure of the incoming email is bad. It's hard to say specifically without looking at a sample incoming email.
  7. What’s the use case to prevent them using it?
  8. This is how we see it too. Preloading everything may trick google but it makes it harder for your browser to figure out loading order.
  9. Average out of the box is fine, we'll take that. It passes all core web vitals tests and gets a solid average score on mobile. We continue to improve the mobile experience with v5.
  10. Native JS. Anything new in 5 is native.
  11. You just need to set up your server correctly, it's not just CSS/JS size. We have optimised our cloud platform to ensure CSS/JS is served via gzip and cached correctly and Google is more than happy with it. Invision Community 5 is removing a lot of redundant JS and CSS, and eventually we want to remove things like jQuery, but it will be a process, so it won't be done for 5.0.0 (or we wouldn't release for another year!). Likewise, user generated content generates a lot of DOM elements and a broad platform such as a forum needs a lot of CSS and JS. But just setting up your server correctly will get you passing core web vitals and fetching a solid score on Page Speed tests.
  12. We have made a conscious decision to be less involved in helping people use budget hosting by adding features to compensate. For example, adding the default option, then adding methods to trim long indexes under the 767 limit, and testing, etc would probably cost around $10,000 in development costs - and we'd only do that to enable people to continue using hosts that don't give you the correct tools. We have added a lot of code and functionality in the past to allow a variety of hosting environments but we really want to be more firm in what we will support moving forwards. This may mean people need to speak with their hosts, or even switch hosts that support our needs (like our own cloud service).
  13. Unlike the final score at Hillsborough on a certain Thursday night in May, as a Posh fan. 😅
  14. Imagine a world where you no longer have to fight hosts, databases and server admin. A world where you can focus purely on building your community instead of hours of your life managing a server. https://invisioncommunity.com/services/switch-to-invision/
  15. We're working on an update to help combat this increased wave of spam.
  16. We have cleaned a lot of these inconsistencies with v5. I'll see if we can tidy up v4 at some point too.
  17. As Nathan said, make sure you're using a CodeMirror editor type, eg. $form->add( new \IPS\Helpers\Form\Codemirror( 'theme_simple_header_settings', $this->custom_header, FALSE, [ 'mode' => 'htmlmixed', 'height' => 400 ] ) );
  18. It's probably caused by the opt-in/essential cookies additions in .11. We're getting a .1 release ready to fix the outstanding issues reported.
  19. Footage of me editing the template until we can upgrade our community with the .1 release.
  20. It'll be fixed in a .1 release that we're preparing to draw a line under the cookie issues reported.
  21. How is this related to a per-group setting? I'll sidestep how inaccurate geolocation is, and that VPNs exist.
  22. So you're not sure why you want us to add a feature? I can see the need for a global on/off depending where you're operating from, and to prevent confusion for when you use SSO and user management is remote. But a per-group option doesn't make any sense in this context.
  23. People go mad over cookies because at one point 3rd party sites could read them and determine your activity on other sites. Browsers have largely closed this down, but here we are with the need for cooke consent. Localstorage is not exposed to any layers that can take that data from another site's database that you have visited, so it's not much exempt as just a different technology that isn't governed in the same way cookies are.
×
×
  • Create New...