rodege5389

Such restrictions do not benefit the community. An open community is a very cheap, stable, and efficient way to product promotion and user retention. It's funny (and sad at the same time) what IPS still hasn't figured it out.
The client lounge could be read-only for not active clients. Contributors section, the same way, could be read-only for those who did not contribute yet, as it has some topics which are useful for those who are just on the way to contribute.

There seem to be a set of content only available to those with resources published in the Marketplace.
I agree that it's an odd choice as there's no mention of it until you come across these embedded things us plebs can't see.
But, I see the link above and have not published anything in Marketplace so not sure why you don't see it. It's in the Client Lounge forum.

Yet another thing causing a big disappointment about IPS is the strange restrictions on the content on this website.


 
Thanks. I hope you will add a way to rebuild old content (including user profiles, signatures, etc.) and change existing images from HTTP to HTTPS where it possible.

I get those error messages as well, even with a full license.

I notice that on the new version 4.5, email notifications are truncated.

I understand the excellent reason for this because rather than giving the full message on the email, it will bring people into the forum.

However, for busy site team members, it causes unnecessary work to have to open every email and then to visit the forum thread to see what is being discussed.

It would be very handy to be able to configure email notifications so that they are truncated for ordinary users and displayed in full for site team.

How about it?

I hope so 🙂

For my communities, I fixed this issue showing the unique ID of the post. You can see it in action here.

Hey,
Thank you for the quick reply. Fixed it for now. Hopefully IPB figures some way out to fix it automatically. The staff team does not have permission to ban users on my forum and they just flag them as spammers and recently a user with 7k posts was flagged as spammer and that's when I realized this could be a major issue for some boards.

This is the expected behavior, but it would be nice to have the option to restore what was done.
You can configure what flag as spammer does in the ACP and make the delete or hide option be an additional step for the moderator to help guard against this.
I don't believe there's any way at present to report back to IPS' spam service that the person you flagged as a spammer is no longer a spammer.

Hi,
IPB has an option to flag a user as spammer from the front end through user profile. This hides all user posts/topics. However, when unflagging the user as spammer the topics/posts are still hidden and need to be manually approved again.
Is this a bug or can anything be done to fix this?
 
Thank you.

How is webp still not a thing in IPBoard?
Google basically forces you into webp with optimisation recommendations.

Safari 14 now supports .webp https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-14-beta-release-notes 

Any news on this? We want to see .webp files as images, not as downloadable attachments :)

https://caniuse.com/#search=webp
Now supported by Edge 18, Chrome, Firefox, Opera and Safari is experimenting with webp support.

When invision will accept this image extension?
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/