OctoDev

That's actually a bug. If you're not using a custom wrapper, it's supposed to use the default. I'll add it to my list. Thanks! 
Just an FYI - I probably will not have a chance to fix these issues today, but will work on them tomorrow. 

I'll be happy to share my template if I can work it out. PM me the other one you saw, it'll at least give me some ideas.

I'm happy to pay more for a responsive developer rather than less for a non-responsive one.

Any way to make the URL a little more friendly?

This will be included in the next version

Agree. $14.50 is quiet expensive, it barely has any customization features.

It's nice idea but to expensive((

demo would be nice
vouch, would buy if this is added

I'm looking into buying this plugin.  (Thanks for developing it!).  Some questions / feature requests:
Disable on mobile view Set height Allow per-topic setting to "collapse" topic cover by each user / allow per-user setting in Account Settings to "collapse" all topic covers   Default topic cover per category 

I would pay about same price for the topics.
Then have some options like:
- Based on cookies.
- Based on IP Address.
- Based on User-Agent & IP Address.
Please 

iaward is disabled because it breaks the new ips 4.1.12 update. I can not enable it. I want my site to work not giving error.

Bought it now.
Question:
- What about Bots, such as Google.. are they limited too?

Currently only Pages.

I have plans to make it larger... for Pages, Forums, Gallery (images) and Blog entries. Probably will be here in a couple of weeks. Of course, since it will have more features, will cost a little bit more...

@Kevin Carwile @-RAW- I probably should post this in the rules app but as it's related to the iawards specific rules set, I think it's better suited here for others to comment upon also. 
I was also mentioned to me by @Jimmy Gavekort
Auto awarding is working great but if I set up a rule as follows, it will supply the member the award that was removed upon next action (i.e. they make a post).
if member has 50 posts, check if they have medal 1, if not, supply medal 1
If member has 100 posts, check if they have medal 2, if not supply medal 2, remove medal 1. Which is how it works just now, how does it know not supply medal 1 again though? As far as I can tell it doesn't and it will supply medal one upon the next action as they don't have the medal but rules thinks they should. 
I think it needs an additional action condition to check if they have medal 2 and if yes not to supply medal 1. It's either that this functionality has been overlooked by myself and I can't find it, or it's missing and it will continue to occur until that additional check is added?
@Kevin Carwile @-RAW- I probably should post this in the rules app but as it's related to the iawards specific rules set, I think it's better suited here for others to comment upon also. 
I was also mentioned to me by @Jimmy Gavekort
Auto awarding is working great but if I set up a rule as follows, it will supply the member the award that was removed upon next action (i.e. they make a post).
if member has 50 posts, check if they have medal 1, if not, supply medal 1
If member has 100 posts, check if they have medal 2, if not supply medal 2, remove medal 1. Which is how it works just now, how does it know not supply medal 1 again though? As far as I can tell it doesn't and it will supply medal one upon the next action as they don't have the medal but rules thinks they should. 
I think it needs an additional action condition to check if they have medal 2 and if yes not to supply medal 1. It's either that this functionality has been overlooked by myself and I can't find it, or it's missing and it will continue to occur until that additional check is added?
Double posts caused by cloudfront, seems IPS are having an issue with them at the moment.

Can someone confirm @Morrigan @-RAW-or anyone at all, if the "User has already been awarded" is fixed. 

Cheers, that worked! 

I see (just tested it out on my forum).
For now I would recommend a work around of adding an additional condition to the rule until we get this fixed.

My current automated awards.

I'm just going to work on prestige medals, which basically counts post count and membership timescales.

 

Apps provide their own ECA's (Events, Conditions, Actions) to rules through the rules extension API so that they can be used in rules. This would be another action that needs to be defined in the extension.
Yes, it appears in the rules app, but only after iAwards would tell rules how to remove an award.

@craigf136 I will discuss it with Raw and if it is something in iAwards (and it's integration into Rules) then we will make sure it gets added in a future release.

@craigf136 and @Jimmy Gavekort I believe that would be more for us and the iAwards app. We can certainly work to do that in a future release.

@Jimmy Gavekort 
Active record created/updated is going to apply to nearly everything in the system. Its basically an event that fires everytime the database is updated. Probably not what you are shooting for.
For example, the rule you are trying to create is an active record. So your rule is probably trying to award you for creating a rule (ironic). You should pick something more specific such as "any content is created or updated", and then add a condition to that rule to check that the "new" variable is true in the event to further limit your rule to just when content is created.
@-RAW-
That error is being generated by iawards, but I cant tell you why at the moment. Rules catches all thrown exceptions so something like that shouldnt happen.
Did you add any code to your api methods that halts execution and sends error output instead of simply throwing an exception that can be caught? It seems like that is what is happening.
I'll have a look at your source code this evening and see whats going on here.

@Kevin Carwile - can you add into the Rules app, the option to remove an award as an action for iAwards? We currently only have the option to add, however, if a user is on tier 1 of post count for example and they have now reached tier 2. We would remove the tier 1 medal and replace with tier 2 (it would need to check that the member has the medal before removing it obviously).

 

custom-action-recount-the-content-for-a-member.xml