Jump to content

Adriano Faria

Clients
  • Posts

    31,588
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    473

Reputation Activity

  1. Agree
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from DSystem in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    They will be there for a couple of years for those who won’t jump in V5 right away.
    File edits will be back with resources being sold in dev’s board. And for those who use marketplace and can’t use FTP, will get limited resources.
    But there’s no doubt it will be the end of this marketplace and I truly believe that’s what IPS is after for a while now.
    I haven’t decided yet if I will keep developing for IPS, as I told somewhere else… and I must confess the answer its getting clear at every blog entry. 
    Anyway, if I remain, certainly will reduce from 300 to 50 maximum, due to… framework limitations. 😂
  2. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from DSystem in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    Thank you. 👏👍
    Still, remove the ability to hook is a huge step back and will make marketplace even worse and smaller but I guess that’s the point after all. A massive number of resources are dead.
    We’re basically back to IP.Board 2 (file edits will be required for custom jobs as we can’t hook) and IP.Board 3 (back to hook points era). 
    Anyway, just my feedback. Not trying to annoy anyone; just my honest feedback.
    Tks.
  3. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from DSystem in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    So the answer is no as there is no HOOKS tab anymore. So resources from now on will extend only official apps that I have in my license. If the user has another 3rd-party resource, it won’t work anymore because I don’t have all the marketplace resources out there to add listeners since it checks for the class. 
    Great improvement. 
  4. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from Joel R in IC5: Commerce   
    Is the cart still exclusive for commerce packages, or can it be used for other items, like Downloads files?
  5. Like
    Adriano Faria reacted to teraßyte in IC5: Commerce   
    What about the ACP? For example, when creating an invoice manually in 4.x it's impossible to add a Downloads file right now.
     
    I also hope Custom packages are heavily reviewed for v5, since they have several bugs.
    Rather, I've reported plenty of bugs (for Commerce and all other apps), and several are still open and untouched even with fixes provided in them (some since 2021-2022). 🤷‍♂️
  6. Agree
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from teraßyte in IC5: Commerce   
    Is the cart still exclusive for commerce packages, or can it be used for other items, like Downloads files?
  7. Like
    Adriano Faria reacted to Esther E. in IC5: Commerce   
    Technically the cart will accept any item, you'd just have to add the button on your end to add it to the cart.
  8. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from Nathan Explosion in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    Can you confirm if we will have access to some sort of content() method to manipulate the content itself?
    If you need some context, that would be one of them: https://invisioncommunity.com/files/file/7821-keyword-tooltipsimbacksale/
    Thank you.
  9. Agree
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from teraßyte in IC5: Menus   
    Hello,
    I don't think my question is related to Menus or if there will be a new blog entry to cover it. I'll ask anyways.
    Will we be able to add buttons to the items view, like in the topic view (red area)?

    Thank you.
  10. Thanks
    Adriano Faria reacted to Esther E. in IC5: Menus   
    Probably with the new template hooks (which we haven't blogged about yet), but I confess I don't remember all the hook points offhand. 
  11. Thanks
    Adriano Faria reacted to Esther E. in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    Yes, it's fired on \IPS\nexus\Invoice\Item. you specify the item type you want to listen on, so in your case you'd create a listener on downloads\extensions\nexus\Item\File.
  12. Thanks
    Adriano Faria reacted to Esther E. in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    We're actually still adding a few things to the listeners, as there were some points that came up as we continue development. I do plan on posting a follow-up in the comments here when we're closer to finalizing those changes. Right now it looks like there may still be more, so I'd rather wait for a bit.
  13. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from Esther E. in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    Of course. What I'm trying to do is get some answers as we're left in the limbo.
  14. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from SeNioR- in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    Were all the suggestions made (by me and others) implemented or?
  15. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from Maxxius in IC5: UI Extensions, Part I   
    Basically, I have a content item that has a "privacy" column. If it is private, it shows to the item creator only; public shows to everyone. I can't use my getItemsWithPermission() because, you know, it is static so I can't check the author against the logged member. Even if I could use it, I wouldn't use it because the item must be accessible by direct link. It just can't be listed.
  16. Thanks
    Adriano Faria reacted to Esther E. in IC5: UI Extensions, Part I   
    I've added your request to our internal list for discussion.
  17. Thanks
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from AlexJ in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    Come on, it’s exactly the opposite. Some are possible. Most won’t be. 
    Bookmarking this to use later. 👍
    I will make a list of my resources that will not be possible to update, after initial tests on V5, of course.
  18. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from AlexJ in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    Thank you. 👏👍
    Still, remove the ability to hook is a huge step back and will make marketplace even worse and smaller but I guess that’s the point after all. A massive number of resources are dead.
    We’re basically back to IP.Board 2 (file edits will be required for custom jobs as we can’t hook) and IP.Board 3 (back to hook points era). 
    Anyway, just my feedback. Not trying to annoy anyone; just my honest feedback.
    Tks.
  19. Like
    Adriano Faria reacted to Daniel F in IC5: Menus   
    Since it's a Raffle item, where you're in control of the class, you can do whatever you want with the menu.
    But for other applications, where you'll have to use the UIItem Extension, you're able to place it at the beginning or end
  20. Like
    Adriano Faria reacted to Esther E. in IC5: Menus   
    At the moment it's only first or last but we've been discussing this internally.
  21. Agree
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from G17 Media in IC5: UI Extensions, Part I   
    A few examples: 
    https://invisioncommunity.com/files/file/7833-profile-field-per-user-group/
    https://invisioncommunity.com/files/file/8783-enhanced-links-moderation/
    There are a ton from other devs. Everywhere. For the most varied reasons and purposes.
    Anyway, this is just to confirm that this will not be the game-changer; it was expected and I really don’t want to enter in another debate like the first blog entry. That’s all I have to say. 👍
  22. Agree
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from G17 Media in IC5: UI Extensions, Part I   
    Hello,
    Is this part specific for content? I suppose we will be able to do this in other places too and not only in content related stuff, right? There are tons of templates and forms out there that we can extend today.
  23. Thanks
    Adriano Faria reacted to Daniel F in IC5: Menus   
    Yea, it's already in the Content\Item and Content\Comment class, you'll just call it in your template or override the method in your content class if you want to add something own.
  24. Like
    Adriano Faria reacted to Kirill Gromov in IC5: Menus   
    Great! Now we need to experience it in practice. 👌
  25. Like
    Adriano Faria got a reaction from G17 Media in IC5: Introduction to Listeners   
    Thank you. 👏👍
    Still, remove the ability to hook is a huge step back and will make marketplace even worse and smaller but I guess that’s the point after all. A massive number of resources are dead.
    We’re basically back to IP.Board 2 (file edits will be required for custom jobs as we can’t hook) and IP.Board 3 (back to hook points era). 
    Anyway, just my feedback. Not trying to annoy anyone; just my honest feedback.
    Tks.
×
×
  • Create New...