Invision Community 5: A video walkthrough creating a custom theme and homepage By Matt Thursday at 04:02 PM
Makoto Posted April 27, 2020 Author Posted April 27, 2020 Hey @Paul E., Can you download and upgrade to the latest release and see if this resolves the errors you are experiencing? Thanks for your patience throughout this investigation!
CoffeeCake Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 11 minutes ago, Makoto said: Hey @Paul E., Can you download and upgrade to the latest release and see if this resolves the errors you are experiencing? Thanks for your patience throughout this investigation! Thanks, @Makoto. I've updated and will report back. The slight display errors still appear, yet will keep an eye on task locking: Looking at the element, the words "Deletion Request" are tagged as font awesome, which causes the odd display of a serif font.
Makoto Posted April 27, 2020 Author Posted April 27, 2020 Ah sorry, I'll take a look at that for you this week and see what I can do about that for you!
CoffeeCake Posted April 29, 2020 Posted April 29, 2020 FYI, we have not seen process locking with this update yet. Makoto 1
Jordan Miller Posted May 3, 2020 Posted May 3, 2020 (edited) Thank you for making this! @Makoto I just purchased it. I love that there's either a deletion request OR a deactivate request where they can re-activate later. I get members from time to time coming back from the past asking for their accounts to be re-instated. Now they can do it themselves. Question: when they ask for their account to be deleted, and they wait passed the grace period, what happens to their posts? Are they deleted? Or do they still appear but as 'Guest?' Edited May 3, 2020 by Jordan Miller
CB_Pam Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 Is it possible to set this so only administrators can approve requests?
Makoto Posted May 12, 2020 Author Posted May 12, 2020 2 hours ago, CB_Pam said: Is it possible to set this so only administrators can approve requests? You can absolutely do this, yep! Just need to set up moderator permissions so only members in the administrator group have access.
Pleeb Posted May 24, 2020 Posted May 24, 2020 I just have one quick question about this. What happens when someone does delete their account? It looks like their posts remain, but is their username replaced with "Guest" on the forum, allowing them to essentially "anonymize" the username attached with the post?
ahc Posted May 28, 2020 Posted May 28, 2020 Hey @Makoto! Quick question before I purchase this. Is there a way to disable the delete option and only display the deactivate option for a member if they've received warnings? We keep all of our accounts with warnings for a minimum of 12 months in case legal action is taken against the user. (We deal with a lot of intellectual property infringement.) I know we can decline the deletion request, but it would avoid the argument of "well why did you give me the option if I can't use it."
Makoto Posted May 28, 2020 Author Posted May 28, 2020 17 hours ago, ahc said: Hey @Makoto! Quick question before I purchase this. Is there a way to disable the delete option and only display the deactivate option for a member if they've received warnings? We keep all of our accounts with warnings for a minimum of 12 months in case legal action is taken against the user. (We deal with a lot of intellectual property infringement.) I know we can decline the deletion request, but it would avoid the argument of "well why did you give me the option if I can't use it." Unfortunately there is not. As an alternative option you could move the user into a custom group that does not have permission to submit deletion requests after they've been warned, but there's no way to programmatically disable deletion requests if a user has warnings at the moment.
CoffeeCake Posted August 14, 2020 Posted August 14, 2020 @Makoto can you share your plans for 4.5 support? Thanks 🙂
Makoto Posted August 21, 2020 Author Posted August 21, 2020 Hey @Paul E.! I've migrated my IPS repositories over from Gitlab to Github and still need to update a few broken links. Support is still to be provided in support topics however, this is just a bit of internal reworking. I do also intend to update this application for IPS 4.5 very soon. CoffeeCake and McAtze 2
Makoto Posted August 23, 2020 Author Posted August 23, 2020 Version 1.5.0 with IPS 4.5 support should be released soon! Just have to wait for it to be reviewed and then all you need to do is update. CoffeeCake and McAtze 2
CoffeeCake Posted August 25, 2020 Posted August 25, 2020 On 8/22/2020 at 9:14 PM, Makoto said: Just have to wait for it to be reviewed and then all you need to do is update. Wow, quite a backlog they must be working through. It's still not released!
CoffeeCake Posted August 26, 2020 Posted August 26, 2020 @Makoto have you gotten any feedback from IPS or is this still legitimately in their queue? This is one of our remaining extensions to start preparing for production upgrade.
CoffeeCake Posted August 30, 2020 Posted August 30, 2020 Welp, this showed up in the Marketplace tonight. And, in spite of the assurances of code reviews by IPS after removing the ability to download 4.5 Marketplace offerings in the "interest of security, stability and customer confidence and support," the resource appears to be broken and displays this error upon attempting to upgrade. 1S111/1 All parts of a PRIMARY KEY must be NOT NULL; if you need NULL in a key, use UNIQUE instead Would love to inspect the code and see what's going on, yet here we are. If I had to guess, there's a SQL structure change adding a primary key that includes a column with null values.
Makoto Posted August 30, 2020 Author Posted August 30, 2020 4 minutes ago, Paul E. said: Welp, this showed up in the Marketplace tonight. And, in spite of the assurances of code reviews by IPS after removing the ability to download 4.5 Marketplace offerings in the "interest of security, stability and customer confidence and support," the resource appears to be broken and displays this error upon attempting to upgrade. 1S111/1 All parts of a PRIMARY KEY must be NOT NULL; if you need NULL in a key, use UNIQUE instead Would love to inspect the code and see what's going on, yet here we are. If I had to guess, there's a SQL structure change adding a primary key that includes a column with null values. Did it abort the upgrade and leave you on the previous version? This was not replicatable on a development environment but I did encounter a bug with the scheme generator in 4.5 that likely caused this to happen on your specific environment. Let me see if I can push a quick hotfix, though it will need to be reviewed and approved as well.
Makoto Posted August 30, 2020 Author Posted August 30, 2020 I can confirm this is a bug, the schema generator is incorrectly displaying that these columns are NOT NULL when they are created as nullable in the upgrade routines. This will only happen on newer versions of MySQL but I'll be pushing a fix for it now.
Makoto Posted August 30, 2020 Author Posted August 30, 2020 @Daniel F any chance you can push this hotfix through? Had to alter the schema files IPS generated and add some queries in an upgrade routine to make 100% sure the columns in questions are NOT NULL here. I'll file a formal bug report later on what may have caused the dev center to do this.
Makoto Posted August 30, 2020 Author Posted August 30, 2020 Thanks Daniel, you're awesome. @Paul E. can you try and upgrade now? This should be resolved.
CoffeeCake Posted August 30, 2020 Posted August 30, 2020 Thanks, @Makoto. The updated 1.5.2 resource installed successfully. I can't test it yet but will report back once I can. The behavior last time seemed to be that the upgrade did not proceed. It still had 1.4.4 listed as the version in ACP, though no idea what it really did in the background and if the hooks were replaced or not.
Jordan Miller Posted September 24, 2020 Posted September 24, 2020 Hi there. @Makoto I tried to merge two member accounts, but received this error: Quote EX1054 Something went wrong. Please try again. UPDATE `deactivation_members` deactivation_members SET `0`='member_id=122400',`1`=133205 WHERE member_id=? IPS\Db\Exception: Unknown column '0' in 'field list' (1054) #0 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/system/Db/Db.php(1161): IPS\_Db->preparedQuery('/*Appétit_invi...', Array) #1 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/applications/deactivation/sources/Deactivation/Deactivation.php(459): IPS\_Db->update('`deactivation_m...', '`0`=?,`1`=?', 'WHERE member_id...') #2 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/applications/deactivation/extensions/core/MemberSync/MemberSync.php(28): IPS\deactivation\_Deactivation::memberSyncMerge(Object(IPS\Member), Object(IPS\Member)) #3 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/system/Member/Member.php(3992): IPS\deactivation\extensions\core\MemberSync\_MemberSync->onMerge(Object(IPS\Member), Object(IPS\Member)) #4 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/system/Member/Member.php(4026): IPS\_Member->memberSync('onMerge', Array) #5 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/applications/core/modules/admin/members/members.php(2652): IPS\_Member->merge(Object(IPS\Member)) #6 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/system/Dispatcher/Controller.php(90): IPS\core\modules\admin\members\_members->merge() #7 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/system/Dispatcher/Dispatcher.php(152): IPS\Dispatcher\_Controller->execute() #8 /home/Appétit/public_html/exhale/admin/index.php(14): IPS\_Dispatcher->run() #9 {main} I recently upgraded to 4.5 and have the latest version of the app. What should I do? Thanks!
Makoto Posted September 24, 2020 Author Posted September 24, 2020 Hey @breatheheavy! Thank you for the report and sorry for the inconvenience! I'll look into this for you today and let you know as soon as I have more information. If I'm able to reproduce the bug I'll have a fix ready by the end of today, but it may take a few days for IPS to review and approve the marketplace update.
Recommended Posts