Aiwa Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 My demo board... 1 user online, ME, no guests... 5 topics, 3 members and the stock IP.Content homepage with parse articles replaced with a topic feed block... My only guess here is that the server is overcrowded... This is a very regular occurance on both this board and another one hosted with a seperate company... So maybe it's an optimization issue on my part w/ the board, even though the optimation settings are STOCK... I'm having identical issues on two of my boards... Both on shared hosting... You click the logo, and it takes 10 seconds before the site even thinks about going to the home page... Then it takes another 10 to load the page so you can actually do something w/ it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcher Technologies Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 there is quite definitively something off at the server level... or a common mod maybe my localhost:Exec. Time: 0.5924 Load: -- Queries: 58 queries That exec time in screenshot is atrocious... my shared cheapazoid hosting never gets like that, and it is quite highly modded being my demo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sefket Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Shared hosting... that says it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcher Technologies Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Shared hosting... that says it all. Talking about me or Aiwa? depends on the host and the needs.... I've never needed more, again, for a demo.... but I have also never hit exec times like that on mine... eew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rimi Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Isn't IPS hosting shared hosting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterUK Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Isn't IPS hosting shared hosting? Yeah but it's their job to make sure IPS Suite runs suitably on it whereas a regular shared host is unlikely to give you any application-specific support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiwa Posted July 19, 2012 Author Share Posted July 19, 2012 The ACP is running like a dog also.. I'm leaning more and more toward a hosting issue here... I should probably disclaimer here... I am not using IPS hosting.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcher Technologies Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Shrug... just trying to state, I highly doubt it is any issue with ipc/ipb stock, or even sanely modified, without naming, I am not hosted on IPS, my demo is a veritable who's-who of stuff built atop the stock.... I would say eyeball the host. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sefket Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Talking about me or Aiwa? depends on the host and the needs.... I've never needed more, again, for a demo.... but I have also never hit exec times like that on mine... eew. Aiwa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiwa Posted July 19, 2012 Author Share Posted July 19, 2012 yeah... Host... Once in a blue moon I get this...Exec. Time: 0.3914 Load: -- Queries: 45 queries Average is in the high teens... Worst I've seen so far is 45... My other board may be exceeding the limits of shared hosting... So I may move both to a VPS sooner rather than later... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmacleo Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 I'd say host too. I got hit with 1424 guests few weeks back (not all crawlers, most actual guests) and my exec times were still .09 or so. may have 1.2 at one time but usually .08 with 25 or so online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcher Technologies Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 That 'once in a blue moon' should be more towards being a normal occurrence(or less exec time than that), not what it is doing... you may not strictly need a VPS depending on the activity you see, but you do need a new host... your current selections quite obviously overcrowd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donpetru Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Great Content IP problem is the large number of queries needed to run the code below:<h3>{$title}</h3> <if test="is_array( $records ) && count( $records )"> {parse striping="feed_striping" classes="row1,row2 altrow"} <foreach loop="$records as $r"> </foreach> </if> It's just an example. And the query execution time, depends really, and host settings. But even so, even if you have good host settings, I have not seen 80 queries to execute in one second or less. Only if you're only visitor to the site and you are in front of the server. But what good is that! Imagine you have 1,000 users online in 15 minutes and IP Content home page needs 85 queries, as the server will respond? I do not want to imagine it. Above, I spoke my humble experience. I tested my web site on three different hosts, one being a home server and behavior is the same. So let's not blame primarily on the host. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcher Technologies Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Great Content IP problem is the large number of queries needed to run the code below:<h3>{$title}</h3> <if test="is_array( $records ) && count( $records )"> {parse striping="feed_striping" classes="row1,row2 altrow"} <foreach loop="$records as $r"> </foreach> </if> It's just an example. And the query execution time, depends really, and host settings. But even so, even if you have good host settings, I have not seen 80 queries to execute in one second or less. Only if you're only visitor to the site and you are in front of the server. But what good is that! Imagine you have 1,000 users online in 15 minutes and IP Content home page needs 85 queries, as the server will respond? I do not want to imagine it. Above, I spoke my humble experience. I tested my web site on three different hosts, one being a home server and behavior is the same. So let's not blame primarily on the host. Donpetru, the factual posts in this topic kind of prove your statement moot. The number of queries has little relevance upon the execution time.... the Efficiency of those queries however does.... one badly written slow query can and will affect that more than 50 efficient ones. 45 queries, 33 seconds, 58 queries, about 1 half of a second. Apples and Oranges, a symptom not the cause.... it always boils down to the server, from a bad mysql tuning to plain bad hosting. At least, ala stock... badly written custom code I have seen do this.... including random php external files to do stuff in content as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiwa Posted July 19, 2012 Author Share Posted July 19, 2012 This is almost amusing now.... Even the board index is slowExec. Time: 5.5455 Load: -- Queries: 8 queriesExec. Time: 10.6634 Load: -- Queries: 8 queries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcher Technologies Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 ...yeah, um... If nothing else was a giveaway, that is... change hosts :tongue: >5 seconds for that? >_< Any hooks? does disabling them affect/help(I really really doubt that actually)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiwa Posted July 19, 2012 Author Share Posted July 19, 2012 Blue moon again... There are only 2 non-IPS hooks on here... Both of which have been disabled for this and the two above..... So 10 seconds to exec a STOCK board index... (recent topics included)Exec. Time: 0.1288 Load: -- Queries: 8 queries I guess i'm on the hunt for either another host or a better plan w/ my current host. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donpetru Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 MT: I understand what you said. What do you think my result below (detailed here see post no.29):Exec. Time: 10.6149 Queries: 88 queries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcher Technologies Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 MT: I understand what you said. What do you think my result below (detailed here see post no.29):Exec. Time: 10.6149 Queries: 88 queries In the index page where is it IPC application I found where result those 83 queries (now I have seen it 85 queries). Distribution of queries is the following: - 7 queries - header and footer; - 5 queries - IPC board statistics and active user(s); - 36 queries - IPC right side bar hooks; - 20 queries - IPC articles - 6 queries - IP Content Glceasytabs If I try to access the forum, the total number of queries is 9 (entire forum website). Now, even with the forum that has those 9 queries, when the number of visitors to the site rises above 50, then show overload problems and the site loads harder. Why? How do you think will improve site access, after I remove those or some queries? I think you need to have someone like .Gary(Rhett, I believe, also does this well) look over your VPS(I am not this guy), when you get an unmanaged VPS, you are looking at pretty much stock sql/php configs(literally a fresh install as you will), this is pre-tuned on shared hosting(non-VPS, VPS is still 'shared', and can be more oversold than normal 'shared' in certain cases, in which case it is your host, move away) to a varying extent, and stock leaves much to be desired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmacleo Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 its been said many times in other topics the MT: I understand what you said. What do you think my result below (detailed here see post no.29):Exec. Time: 10.6149 Queries: 88 queries been said in many places you have bad host. you can screw around trying to force it to work but you are wasting your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcher Technologies Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 its been said many times in other topics the been said in many places you have bad host. you can screw around trying to force it to work but you are wasting your time. ^ A bad host, is a bad host, the package(this means you Aiwa as well), or any tuning/fighting with it, will not help enough to matter when it is a bad host... overcrowded is plain overcrowded... they do it at one paid package level, they will usually do it at them all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmacleo Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 exactly. you can only overcome so much before you are wasting time and resources trying to adapt to crap setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyhoe Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Sorry to hijack this thread. I am concerned about how long my shared hosting will last me. If somebody could have a quick look at my site and its functions, would they be able to tell me how many users at one time i would be able to support before having to consider a VPS or dedicated hosting. Sorry if this is like asking "how long is a piece of string?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiwa Posted July 19, 2012 Author Share Posted July 19, 2012 Sorry to hijack this thread. I am concerned about how long my shared hosting will last me. If somebody could have a quick look at my site and its functions, would they be able to tell me how many users at one time i would be able to support before having to consider a VPS or dedicated hosting. Sorry if this is like asking "how long is a piece of string?" You've got a while.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyhoe Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Not sure if that was a serious answer or not.. Right now the site is not really fully launched so yes i will have a while. I was more wondering at what point most IPB communities have to make the switch from shared hosting. Im not sure how full the server is but it seems relatively fast for me so lets say its your average shared hosting plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.