derece Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Hi, How are u guys make IPB fast. Im enable all posible caches in IPB admin panel Im tune all Apache settings im use AddModule mod_gzip.c and it works mod_gzip_on Yes mod_gzip_can_negotiate Yes mod_gzip_static_suffix .gz AddEncoding gzip .gz mod_gzip_update_static No mod_gzip_command_version '/mod_gzip_status' mod_gzip_temp_dir /home/sites/gzip mod_gzip_keep_workfiles No mod_gzip_minimum_file_size 500 mod_gzip_maximum_file_size 5000000 mod_gzip_maximum_inmem_size 60000 mod_gzip_min_http 1000 mod_gzip_handle_methods GET POST mod_gzip_item_include file .php$ mod_gzip_item_include file .html$ mod_gzip_item_include file .js$ mod_gzip_item_include file .css$ mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/html mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/plain mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/css$ mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript$ mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/javascript$ mod_gzip_item_exclude file .gif$ mod_gzip_item_exclude file .png$ mod_gzip_item_exclude file .jpg$ mod_gzip_dechunk Yes LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%V %r\" % Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 put it on a good server and not a crappy host. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Campbell Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 What's your forum URL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derece Posted February 17, 2011 Author Share Posted February 17, 2011 put it on a good server and not a crappy host. Im use dedicated server: OS: FreeBSD 7.2Hardware: Intel Xeon 3230-Quad Core 2.6GHz/4GB DDR2 RAM/250GB SATA II hw.machine: i386hw.model: Intel® Xeon® CPU X3230 @ 2.66GHz hw.physmem: 3743772672 hw.realmem: 3756916736 What servers are u use guys? i think this server is ok, or not? and server load really low website address is surftime.ru Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robulosity2 Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 because you run a dedicated machine, you may want to post some configuration information in the Server Optimization area of the site so its seen by the group of members here who can best help you. If your MySQL is tuned badly or there's IO issues you may see a few bottle necks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derece Posted February 17, 2011 Author Share Posted February 17, 2011 because you run a dedicated machine, you may want to post some configuration information in the Server Optimization area of the site so its seen by the group of members here who can best help you. If your MySQL is tuned badly or there's IO issues you may see a few bottle necks cat /etc/my.cnf [mysqld] bind-address=127.0.0.1 ft_min_word_len=3 skip-locking skip-innodb skip-bdb query_cache_size =128M key_buffer_size =128M query_cache_limit = 2M thread_cache_size = 6 table_cache = 512 In apache im have default settings for MinSpareServers 5 MaxSpareServers 10 MaxClients 150 Im do AB benchmark and have this results bn33# ab -n 100 -c 10 http://surftime.ru/ Benchmarking surftime.ru (be patient).....done Server Software: Apache Server Hostname: surftime.ru Server Port: 80 Document Path: / Document Length: 230526 bytes Concurrency Level: 10 Time taken for tests: 142.470 seconds Complete requests: 100 Failed requests: 99 (Connect: 0, Receive: 0, Length: 99, Exceptions: 0) Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 23094753 bytes HTML transferred: 23068653 bytes Requests per second: 0.70 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 14246.966 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 1424.697 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 158.30 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 11 12 2.6 11 23 Processing: 6615 14146 1437.1 14167 21990 Waiting: 6397 13885 1427.4 13896 21702 Total: 6634 14159 1436.6 14178 22001 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 14178 66% 14421 75% 14594 80% 14732 90% 15237 95% 15504 98% 15569 99% 22001 100% 22001 (longest request) The results it terrible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 I can almost guarantee that this is nothing to do with IP.Board, or your server. This is much more likely to be a routing problem between users/Google and your server's data center. Unfortunately, routing between Russia (and Eastern Europe) and the rest of the world seems to have sporadic issues that can make your site look slow, even when it's blazing fast most of the time. For example, I've just run some tests from one of our servers and we get between 5% and 10% packet loss on the route to your server. In addition, ping response times vary from a normal 100-200ms, to 2000ms. This can have a huge impact on the "feel" of your site's speed, and the pagespeed tracking that Google records. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derece Posted February 18, 2011 Author Share Posted February 18, 2011 I can almost guarantee that this is nothing to do with IP.Board, or your server. This is much more likely to be a routing problem between users/Google and your server's data center. Unfortunately, routing between Russia (and Eastern Europe) and the rest of the world seems to have sporadic issues that can make your site look slow, even when it's blazing fast most of the time. For example, I've just run some tests from one of our servers and we get between 5% and 10% packet loss on the route to your server. In addition, ping response times vary from a normal 100-200ms, to 2000ms. This can have a huge impact on the "feel" of your site's speed, and the pagespeed tracking that Google records. If u check my server ip adrees u can see it located in Dallas USA, im use only USA dedicated servers for my projects. To check it its easy like:ping surftime.ru and the whois 174.36.244.76 OrgName: SoftLayer Technologies Inc. OrgId: SOFTL Address: 1950 N Stemmons Freeway City: DallasStateProv: TXPostalCode: 75207Country: US So at the moment IPB support have the most stupidest answer in all topic, thanks guys;) P.S: and yes im do all tests from my enother USA server, and of course google servers located in USA to. P.P.S:I've just run some tests from one of our servers and we get between 5% and 10% packet loss on the route to your server. Can u post here your test results please. This is my test from server 64.120.141.26 OrgName: Network Operations Center Inc. OrgId: NOCAddress: PO Box 591 City: Scranton and results looks very good 64 bytes from 174.36.244.76: icmp_seq=0 ttl=58 time=11.032 ms ....99 packets transmitted, 99 packets received, 0.0% packet lossround-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.816/11.172/11.531/0.168 ms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 I just went to your site and it loads very fast. But, the total time it took is 10+ seconds. Why? Because there was a bad gravatar requests that ate up 10 seconds on certain pages. The 2nd biggest bottleneck to loading time is facebook. It's eating about 2~3 seconds on average for your page to complete. After browser cache takes place, everything's loaded under 1.5 seconds. I'm not sure I see the problem except for some false measurements. Bottleneck of the time measured is not your server at all. Your graphs show that your server isn't having any problems as well from hardware wise (though, possibly the most troublesome, iostat isn't posted). From SSH, you can type "iostat" and paste it to show io stats. But, doubt it's the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 If u check my server ip adrees u can see it located in Dallas USA, im use only USA dedicated servers for my projects. So at the moment IPB support have the most stupidest answer in all topic, thanks guys;) Hey - There's no need to be rude, I'm only trying to help. The confusion stemmed from the last hop on traceroute: 10 174.36.244.76-static.reverse.reserver.ru (174.36.244.76) 145.382 ms 144.516 ms 144.973 ms but it seems that is your server, so fair enough. Today i'm getting no packet loss, yesterday I got 5-10% from our server. As for site speed, I'd agree with the above. Your site loads fast, but all of the (quite a lot of) additional resources make up the 10+ seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary. Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Your site load's fine, Only delay was serving the images and such other than that it responds well, Even a USA server, To the UK ping was 64ms to me and 0 packet loss, But the ping times are quick for me due to using fastpath. To me mysql is fine, I would say the apache would need tuning, If you want speed then mod_fcgi is your only option, And I would 100% use this with FCGI if your not managing other websites on the box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 I have a question for you... why are you hosting a server for Russians in the USA? your target audience is Russia and your server should be closest to your target. Just wondering.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derece Posted February 19, 2011 Author Share Posted February 19, 2011 I have a question for you... why are you hosting a server for Russians in the USA? your target audience is Russia and your server should be closest to your target. Just wondering.......... Thats easy bro, audience of the site is people who travel around the world and i think location in usa is good choice. For example, if u location vietnam or indonesia transfer data from USA much more faster then from europe. And from russia to usa internet channel is very fast. Thanks guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derece Posted February 19, 2011 Author Share Posted February 19, 2011 Your site load's fine, Only delay was serving the images and such other than that it responds well, Even a USA server, To the UK ping was 64ms to me and 0 packet loss, But the ping times are quick for me due to using fastpath. To me mysql is fine, I would say the apache would need tuning, If you want speed then mod_fcgi is your only option, And I would 100% use this with FCGI if your not managing other websites on the box. What do u think about some accelerators? like eAccelerator Alternative PHP Cache Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shamil Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 I prefer APC/XCache. You should locate your server where the majority or your target audience is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Thanks for the info, I prefer XCache and run it on every server, it works very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexJ Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * * Remove the following redirect chain if possible: * Basically www and without www issue, if I am correct. For me it's working fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derece Posted February 20, 2011 Author Share Posted February 20, 2011 Thanks guys, im fix some settings, and now it works not bad. block_cache_ttl value is really important things in IP.Content :whistle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexJ Posted February 20, 2011 Share Posted February 20, 2011 block_cache_ttl value is really important things in IP.Content :whistle: What you are using at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derece Posted February 22, 2011 Author Share Posted February 22, 2011 What you are using at? In my front page i use many of IP.Content blocks how result its many sql queries. U must setup cache lifetime to minimize it. With TTL i have around 24-25 queries per second to my site and mysql load is really slow Without TTL mysql load is 40% and i have 0.6-0.7 queries per second Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexJ Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 In my front page i use many of IP.Content blocks how result its many sql queries. U must setup cache lifetime to minimize it. With TTL i have around 24-25 queries per second to my site and mysql load is really slow Without TTL mysql load is 40% and i have 0.6-0.7 queries per second Isn't the load should increase with high QPS ? TTL On -> 25 QPS -> Load Slow ?? TTL Off -> 0.7 QPS -> Load 40% i.e. Higher or Lower then before? I am so confused with your explanation... Please elaborate. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derece Posted February 25, 2012 Author Share Posted February 25, 2012 TTL or its row name on BD block_cache_ttl, its a cache timeout option for IPContent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.72c24494603afd7a572d55d4a71e4af2.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.