Wolfie

When a post is reported, the reported post is copied into the report, so making edits doesn't make a difference.

Working on the other groups, but should be fixed (to 20) for Active customers group.

So was my guess right, that 0 turns it off for a group now?

The way I was thinking was to specify users who could use the multimod in the same way you specify forums it's available in. The existing system can do almost the same thing, but this would give finer control (though again, it's not an urgent priority).

Ah so what you mean is...

MultiMod, control which forums each function is available in (as it is now)
Per forum, add a group/individual as a moderator, do a checklist of each multi-mod function they may use.

Yeah that could get messy.

Oh oh oh.. Maybe just maybe.. Oh oh oh...

Maybe they fixed the rep system so that 0 disables it for a member group? Just they haven't fixed the skins to reflect that yet and they haven't adjusted the member groups to allow us to give like 1440 reps per day..

I was thinking per multimod, not globally for all of them. That isn't essential though.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are looking for.

But as it is now, you can create a multi-mod function. Specify which forums/subforums it is available in. Then per forum you can add a member group (or a user) as a moderator and specify if they may or may not use the multi-mod functions.

As for global moderators, they will have access to it, but a global moderator is 'above' a regular moderator in a manner of speaking.

Are you SURE you don't see anything different between your original post (quoted above) and the quote I did of it (shown below)?

• Allow member groups (and maybe other things too) to be changed along with changing the topic. This was a feature that I used extensively when I was using ZetaBoards and going without it has made things a bit more complicated.
• To make sure that the above didn't get abused, allow admins to specify specific users or groups who can use the multi-moderation, instead of making it globally available to moderators.

These would be really helpful to me. I don't know how many other admins would make use of these improvements, but it might be worth looking at.

I think you're talking about whether or not a group can use multi-moderation.

If that's correct then it's already part of IPB.

You can control not only which forums a multi-mod function is available to, but you can specify (per group or per member) who can use multi-moderation functions, per forum.

I don't see any diiference

BTW Do you need to download those smilies to use them or can you link to them?

(I know you have dl them but can't find a terms of use on the site)

I download them and them upload them here. Way I see it, if the other site goes down or has trouble, then the images will stop working.

As for your post and my quoting of it, are you sure you can't spot any difference?

Because that smilie tears at your heart strings, I'll let you off

Oh that's nothing...


Oh and look at my quote of your post. Compare it to your actual post. :shifty:

Maybe it has!

Bad Wolfie, Bad

Oops...

aaah, Very nice. That is exactly what I wanted for something I'm working on if I'm honest. :P

Think you'll be able to make use of #show_applications# ?

They need to stop ph34ring things that make sense.

As for the discussion at hand, the top button serves no useful purpose at all. Not even a little. It lets you get to the top of the screen, that's it. Except there's about 10 different methods of accomplishing this, with or without a mouse button or keyboard, built into your operating system and browser already. It's clutter that serves no purpose, which we've avoided with 3.0 in an effort to streamline the user interface and make it easier for novices. Some users, when they see 15000 buttons on a row, tend to just ignore them all (guilty!). Now, you only have icons relevant to the data point (e.g. for posts, icons related to that post, of which "the top button" does not qualify).

Meh, this has been debated to death. Suffice it to say, Rikki has had no intentions of bringing it back, and I don't blame him. ;)

How about Next/Previous posts buttons? Very useful when you see a huge ass post and want to skip to the next one but don't want to spend all day scrolling the page looking for it. (w00t)

The higher you go, the greater the fall to the bottom. :)

When you make a setting to use in the ACP in the System Settings, for the Extra to show to the Admin, you put in #show_groups# or #show_forums#, etc, and then it gives you a list when you see the setting in use.

Like in Topis, Posts & Polls, the "Ignored Users: Protected Groups" setting, it shows a list of the different Member Groups. If you were to look at the data to make that setting possible, you would see #show_groups#


Make a new setting to play with:

Enjoy! :D

Am I the only one who's getting the pagination of this topic backwards on topic view?

Is it because of the browser of the person who created the thread?

No, it's the same for me too.

Huh?

Makes sense at the bottom. But so long as I can change it in the ACP (setting), then no biggie.

I like the bottom, you see the list of updates and then at the bottom you can change yours. Much like reading a topic, you don't have the quick reply at the top of the topic.

Place to enter text at top now? :blink:

I thought it was better at the bottom. Will this be configurable in the ACP (top/bottom)?

Anything that helps out those who make hooks and applications. :)

[quote name='tera

Could it be made (in 3.0.2) to only ask twice if it won't be going to the trashcan? The second warning having a big unavoidable note saying that it cannot be undone, ie, not going into the trashcan.

It could be used by board admins when they want to show someone new the different features of the ACP, but without risk of live data being messed up. Would also allow admins to test out functions as they teach themselves with an easy 'reset' button.

I know it might not be too feasible to make available (even if only to those with active IPB licenses) but figured it couldn't hurt to mention the idea.

TSIA.

Be able to do <#MEMBER_EMAIL#> and <#MEMBER_IP#> in the email sent to the admin, because sometimes it helps to determine right away if the person is legit or not before getting into the ACP. While going to log in, the admin could be doing a spam search for the email (or even modify the admin_newuser to make the email into a link) so it's easier to take action.

I'm not a skinner so I didn't know about the CSS part, but yeah the search isn't showing results from the CSS areas even though I searched a term that I know is in there.