shyest Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Currently there is a sales discount for a certain number of items sold and then the next item would be discounted. I am looking for a way to sell lets say 100 items and have the price of those all go down to xyz instead of regular price.
shyest Posted February 23, 2016 Author Posted February 23, 2016 So does no one else need this type of functionality or am I explaining it for no one to understand the request?
steve00 Posted February 23, 2016 Posted February 23, 2016 <Deleted> as just tested what I thought and didn't work
shyest Posted February 23, 2016 Author Posted February 23, 2016 The sales discount will only discount 1 of the whole lot so you'll got the 101st item at the discounted price not every single one. I appreciate the responce though.
shyest Posted March 1, 2016 Author Posted March 1, 2016 So no one knows even how to go about doing anything like this?
shyest Posted March 3, 2016 Author Posted March 3, 2016 This is what I'm looking for: I am wanting the exactl same like the Sales Discount section however it will discount the whole sale. For example if someone buys 1-4 of my items the price is $435 an item however if they buy 5-9 items the price per item drops to $400. So from the above an example... I have a customer wanting 3 items. they put in 3 and the total would come out to be $1,305. Now anther customer wanting 7 items their price would be $2,800. I am wanting it to look exactly like the "Sale Discounts" section but apply like I have described in the above paragraph example.
shyest Posted March 7, 2016 Author Posted March 7, 2016 No one looking for a similar type of discount setup?
Flitterkill Posted March 7, 2016 Posted March 7, 2016 Agree. Would be a nice addition. Note that although no IPS staff have responded this topic is now flagged for internal review (see tag) so they are giving it an official look.
shyest Posted March 7, 2016 Author Posted March 7, 2016 31 minutes ago, Flitterkill said: Agree. Would be a nice addition. Note that although no IPS staff have responded this topic is now flagged for internal review (see tag) so they are giving it an official look. I understand what the internal review means, I was just seeing if anyone else was looking or thinking this would be something they are looking for as well.
shyest Posted March 21, 2016 Author Posted March 21, 2016 If anyone sells like a wholeseller they will want this type of functionality.
shyest Posted April 6, 2016 Author Posted April 6, 2016 So how long can a topic stay in internal review status?
Tarquin Posted April 13, 2016 Posted April 13, 2016 I support and would like to see this feature also.
Management Lindy Posted April 14, 2016 Management Posted April 14, 2016 On April 6, 2016 at 0:47 AM, shyest said: So how long can a topic stay in internal review status? Until it moves to planned or not planned based on our assessment of feasibility and demand. There's no timeline on this, it depends on a number of different factors such as how and whether or not we can work it into a another feature or future plans, etc.
Joel R Posted April 15, 2016 Posted April 15, 2016 4 hours ago, Lindy said: Until it moves to planned or not planned based on our assessment of feasibility and demand. There's no timeline on this, it depends on a number of different factors such as how and whether or not we can work it into a another feature or future plans, etc. I'd like to respectfully request that IPS reconsiders the timelines (or lack thereof) on the "planned / not planned / internal review" tags. Their primary purpose is provide greater clarity to IPS' development intentions, right? (Maybe. It could also be to show off the tag feature? Maybe?) We don't necessarily need IPS to give definitive timeframes in the immediate, short-term, or even medium-term. But there comes an inflection point in the long-run when the tags' value becomes less and less useful. As an extreme example, which can realistically happen under the current framework: A tag is marked as Internal Review 4 years later it's still marked as Internal Review IPS has moved onto IPS 5 The value of your tags has decayed to nothing, because you're already working on the next version of IPS. The board becomes littered with useless tags. I'm certainly not saying clients need total transparency of exact timeframes in the near future, but I do think it would be reasonable for items marked in certain tag categories to be reviewed on a reasonable basis to ensure their validity. That's the only way these tags will stay relevant on a rolling basis.
Management Lindy Posted April 15, 2016 Management Posted April 15, 2016 I understand the concern. The purpose of the tags are to give an insight into whether or not a particular suggestion will be considered or implemented in the future. Eventually, we'd like to do a full categorized feature tracker. We're still vetting this out in terms of public expectations and the ability to incorporate it into our development process, but we are reviewing them regularly.
shyest Posted July 22, 2016 Author Posted July 22, 2016 Any update @Lindy on this internal review item?
IPCommerceFan Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 I needed this just the other day. It 'just makes sense' in my opinion to offer a discount this way. It is also my understanding, however, that IP.Commerce hasn't quite had its overhaul yet. It is largely still Nexus with a few tweaks. Perhaps Commerce will get its chance once the core functionality and more popular applications are completed, although I would argue that strengthening Commerce first would attract more customers who would be willing to pay more for the immense value it has the potential to deliver. (I've been using Nexus since ~2011, and have been holding out hope for such an overhaul all this time.. lol)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.