Daniel F

Could you please submit a ticket, I'd like to take a look at the issue to see why it happened.

And for people which like 3rd party stuff, we have at least one file in the marketplace for this:

Here's some example code which should work

This was moved to the account settings

There’s a bug prevent that the member page pagination is shown. This was fixed for an upcoming release

There’s also at least one MP file allowing people to choose the group while registration.

Thx, this is related to a similar issue I'm working on right now.

Thanks, I have fixed this for an upcoming release.

Downloading the pending version update isn't logged as download. And if you take a look at the file, you'll see that he posted a new version while the file was waiting for approval

You can disable it global in your ACP => Community => Forums => "Topic Summary Settings"

Top Menu => Resources => Theme Differences , links to https://invisioncommunity.com/index.php?app=core&module=system&controller=plugins&do=diff

I guess that's an issue with the 3rd party app then 🙂 But to get back to your initial question, once the "Customers can submit reviews" setting is enabled, they'll see the review form on the product page!

Hi and welcome to our new series of updates for our contributors. We'll highlight the most common mistakes, ways to resolve them and also generic improvement suggestions once a month here:) As first, I want to apologies that some files took really long to get approved, but we really expected that new submissions and upgrades would have a better quality, but unfortunately >60% of the submissions ( 90% in the first week) were still not following the new marketplace guidelines, which resulted in a devils circle. Let's recap the last months issues resulting in rejections🙂 Core Database changes. Version details not changed. Usage of existing IPS error codes in your own code. Usage of \IPS\ROOT_PATH in your code. See 4.5 dev changes Upgrade steps trying to process too many data. Please try to process data from huge tables in batches instead of iterating over such a big datasource in one step. We're also seeing a huge trend in extra queries and extra joins, which are unnecessary most of the time, please don't be lazy and try to use your common sense and ask yourself what's the preferred solution in this case? A global join each time the object is initialized? A second query when the object is initialized? Lazy load the data when needed? Last but not least, please avoid altering the Groups database table! While we allowed this in the past, we see a big trend that many developers already use own tables and logic for this too, which works really great. Because of this we'll start to be more strict here, so starting tomorrow any new submissions will have to follow this rule too!

@Michael.J some clients aren't able to upgrade to the recent version because your last 2 releases had the same version. Please follow the guidelines and increase the version for each release. https://invisioncommunity.com/developers/submission-guidelines/

Absolutely not, except if we found some issues in the code, which the author needs to resolve before it gets approved. In this case, the submission was rejected because it wasn’t following the MP guidelines, and there were no further updates since then.

Do you have access to the server logs? Are there any errors logged?

We have an internal suggestion for this.

Via ticket ask for the deletion of the pending version.

Does this also happen with the English language ? I guess it’s an issue with your translation.

https://invisioncommunity.com/settings/account-security/

What didn't work? What's the used code? What's the code after submitting the post?

The recently joined badge is shown for members which joined in the last 30 days

That’s shown automatically for moderator accounts.

You shouldn’t see this error at all when clubs are disabled. Could you please clarify where exactly you’re seeing the error? Is probably better to submit a ticket so that we can investigate this better.

2C349/2 happens when clubs are disabled 2S100/2 means that the module permissions don't allow members and admins to access this page. Have you changed recently anything under Admin CP → System → Applications ?