Achievement In Motion

Wow these are cloud only? I literally paid close to 2k CAD for the full suite and I don't get the ability to utilize these features? 

How can I access Live Topics? Its not in the moderator control panel and I have the latest update.

I just saw that and I sent some feedback, I’m sure I’m not the only one who thinks this but you guys shouldn’t be taking that away as the main goal for any brand is an all in one platform that’s cohesive rather than forcing us to find alternative platforms which truly take away from productivity and overall hurts our usability.

Choose "Collaboration memberships" from the drop down menu that appears when you click your user name in top right.

I agree in some respects to the comments above although we have still seen a reasonable contribution rate but not to where it was before. It is a change that members just really need to become familiar with.
I think your comments fully support our view that it would be great to display GC categories as a category on the main board index and integrate better. It really needs the ability to see latest post inancollab on the board index. Currently they are set several layers deep within the suite. It works perfectly but @Kevin Carwile it would really be awesome for you to find a way to integrate the collab categories as categories on the board index which means it has the flexibility that GC brings but makes content easily found.

Hey,
i got a small request if that is possible.
When im adding collabs, many of the owners for the collabs want to have a great looking and easy domain to access the collab directly.
Is it possible to integrate a friendly url to single collabs, like it is done for blogs as example.
Regards

GC is an app management system. By fundamental design it does not manage content. In other words, it is an app that manages other apps (and those apps manage the content).
What Im trying to explain is that in order to get your roster management features "added on" to your site running GC, an application must first be built to manage that roster content. GC would then in turn manage that app in collaborative mode.
So when I say that it would be a separate app, it actually needs to be separate app by mere necessity, not just because I want to make more money from it.

Hm, I'm rather surprised there's no roster management. Social Groups has one, and it's fairly simple. You can invite people, remove people, adjust their forum rank, and add different ranks (beyond Guest, Member, Moderator, Admin). We used this to great effect: we added ranks for the hierarchy of our groups and used this to create forums within groups that were accessible by e.g. just the officers within the group. You also get the tabbed interface for a membership list. This is all doable from the GroupCP with no ACP access.
Within collaborations there's always some sort of hierarchy - you generally need to give certain people more or less responsibility than others. Attaching a simple label to that, and driving things like forum badges and access permissions from that makes perfect sense to me in a very abstractable sense.
I've attached 3 screenshots of how rsyvarth's Social Groups solves this problem.
I thought Group Collaboration was basically a superset of rsyvarth's code. Does Group Collaboration not provide these features?

I see that you purchased the app and gave it a review. Thanks so much for that, I really appreciate it!
But you docked me a star because it isnt a roster management app also? Man, thats harsh.
Ive never claimed that it is a roster management app nor is it supposed to be. It is a collaborative app that allows you to designate apps (such as a roster management app) for collaborative use.
Its outside the scope of what GC does, and it is just impractical to make it more than that.
You want to use it for teams, someone else wants to use it for client project management, yet another person wants to use it for school groups. Should the guy who wants to use GC to help facilitate his collaboration with clients expect GC to manage his timesheets also?